Ordinarius, a Brazilian A Cappella Group, Celebrates Carmen Miranda with First US Tour

    Ordinarius, a Brazilian a cappella group

    A cappella steadily continues to increase in popularity thanks to YouTube stars Walk Off the Earth and Pentatonix, and movies such as the multi-million-dollar grossing “Pitch Perfect” series are shining the spotlight on this unique vocal tradition.

    Using voice as a primary instrument, a cappella artists cover everything from classic rock songs to hip-hop hits and Top 40 tunes.

    In January 2019, mega-hot Brazilian vocal group Ordinarius will embark on its inaugural US tour. This band of six singers and a percussionist combine the novelty of a cappella with songs accompanied by cavaquinho (a small Portuguese string instrument), guitar, ukulele, and drums.

    Its repertoire includes everything from American pop (Stevie Wonder) to rock (The Beatles), and from Brazilian bossa nova to samba – and even the instrumental genre of “choro.”

    Made up of members Augusto Ordine (musical director), Maíra Martins, Mateus Xavier, Rebeca Vieira, Fabiano Salek, Matias Correa, and Beatriz Coimbra, Ordinarius has breathed new life into Brazil’s most beloved songs using vibrant harmonies, Brazilian rhythms, and a fun, engaging stage presence.

    The group’s cover of The Backstreet Boys’ “As Long As You Love Me” was recommended by BSB themselves on Twitter and Facebook, garnering new fans and listeners from all over the world.

    After winning first place in the National Vocal Group Competition in Rio de Janeiro in 2014, Ordinarius ended its year with a crowdfunding campaign to record a new album dedicated to the “choro” genre.

    The group has now toured Brazil and Europe, with fans worldwide and hundreds of thousands of views on its YouTube channel.

    Ordinarius has also participated in numerous educational events (several of its members are music instructors), including teaching Brazilian music workshops in Frankfurt where they were invited to perform at Brotfabrik.

    In 2017, the award-winning group was introduced to American audiences in New York City, instantly becoming a favorite, sold-out act at music festivals everywhere. The group also successfully raised funds for the recording of its latest album, Notável, dedicated to renowned Portuguese-Brazilian singer Carmen Miranda.

    Participating in the SESC São Paulo Circuit, the group performed in 9 different cities in the interior of São Paulo. Ordinarius also participated in the Asunción to Voices festival in Paraguay, and the Auvernier Jazz Festival in Switzerland.

    Ordinarius’ U.S. tour will include selections from Notável. One of the most outstanding artists in the 1930s in Brazil and the 1940s in the U.S., Carmen Miranda was famous worldwide for her comedic cameos speaking and singing in accented English in Hollywood films.

    Ordinarius will present original arrangements of her classics such as “Tico-tico no fubá,” “Na Baixa do Sapateiro,” “Disseram que eu voltei americanizada,” and “O que é que a baiana tem.”

    This musical journey through Miranda’s repertoire is accompanied by the aesthetic reimagining of Miranda’s famed visual concept; the colorful costumes and fruit-inspired props she drew up herself as a way of sharing Brazilian culture with the world.

    In addition to Ordine’s musical direction, scenic supervision by Flávio Paiva, scenography by Ana Rezende, and lighting by Fernanda Montavani will create a fabulously bright, compelling, and unbelievable atmosphere that celebrates not only the legacy of Carmen Miranda, but Brazilian culture as a whole.

    Ordinarius will perform live at the Oshman Family JCC in Palo Alto at 8:00pm on Thursday, January 17, 2019. Tickets are now available at paloaltojcc.org/ordinarius. The group will also visit various locations in Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa, and California during its U.S. tour in 2019. For more information, please visit https://www.eng.ordinarius.com.br/

    Steph Keay is a Canadian blogger currently living in the Bay Area. As an arts and lifestyle writer, there is never a shortage of fantastic performances and cultural events to attend between San Francisco and San Jose! She can be reached at thekeayblog@gmail.com

    Tags:

    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    United States' president, Donald J. Trump

    Rousseff, Brazil’s Ex-president, Calls Trump’s Meddling in Venezuela Irresponsible and Criminal

    Washington’s attempts to interfere in politics in South America, including in Venezuela, are “extremely ...

    US vice president Joe Biden meets Michel Temer in New York - Beto Barata/PR

    How the Washington Regime Change Machine Was Able to Oust Brazil’s President Rousseff

    Washington’s regime change machinery has for the time being succeeded in removing an important ...

    A policeman in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Speaking Out or Complaining Is a Sure Way to Jail for Brazilian Policemen

    Brazilian authorities should reform laws that have been used to impose disproportionate punishments on ...

    It seems the future never arrives in Brazil What Lies Ahead in Brazil? Brazil Has No Exemplary Past or Present. But What Lies Ahead for the Country? Europeans, US, developed country, developing country. Bolsonaro, future B. Michael Rubin For years, experts have debated what separates a developing country from a developed one. The GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of a country is one simple way to measure its economic development. Another way to measure a country's progress is the extent of public education, e.g. how many citizens complete high school. A country's health may be measured by the effectiveness of its healthcare system, for example, life expectancy and infant mortality. With these measurement tools, it's easier to gauge the difference between a country like Brazil and one like the U.S. What's not easy to gauge is how these two countries developed so differently when they were both "discovered" at the same time. In 1492 and 1500 respectively, the U.S. and Brazil fell under the spell of white Europeans for the first time. While the British and Portuguese had the same modus operandi, namely, to exploit their discoveries for whatever they had to offer, not to mention extinguishing the native Americans already living there if they got in the way, the end result turned out significantly different in the U.S. than in Brazil. There are several theories on how/why the U.S. developed at a faster pace than Brazil. The theories originate via contrasting perspectives – from psychology to economics to geography. One of the most popular theories suggests the divergence between the two countries is linked to politics, i.e. the U.S. established a democratic government in 1776, while Brazil's democracy it could be said began only in earnest in the 1980s. This theory states that the Portuguese monarchy, as well as the 19th and 20th century oligarchies that followed it, had no motivation to invest in industrial development or education of the masses. Rather, Brazil was prized for its cheap and plentiful labor to mine the rich soil of its vast land. There is another theory based on collective psychology that says the first U.S. colonizers from England were workaholic Puritans, who avoided dancing and music in place of work and religious devotion. They labored six days a week then spent all of Sunday in church. Meanwhile, the white settlers in Brazil were unambitious criminals who had been freed from prison in Portugal in exchange for settling in Brazil. The Marxist interpretation of why Brazil lags behind the U.S. was best summarized by Eduardo Galeano, the Uruguayan writer, in 1970. Galeano said five hundred years ago the U.S. had the good fortune of bad fortune. What he meant was the natural riches of Brazil – gold, silver, and diamonds – made it ripe for exploitation by western Europe. Whereas in the U.S., lacking such riches, the thirteen colonies were economically insignificant to the British. Instead, U.S. industrialization had official encouragement from England, resulting in early diversification of its exports and rapid development of manufacturing. II Leaving this debate to the historians, let us turn our focus to the future. According to global projections by several economic strategists, what lies ahead for Brazil, the U.S., and the rest of the world is startling. Projections forecast that based on GDP growth, in 2050 the world's largest economy will be China, not the U.S. In third place will be India, and in fourth – Brazil. With the ascendency of three-fourths of the BRIC countries over the next decades, it will be important to reevaluate the terms developed and developing. In thirty years, it may no longer be necessary to accept the label characterized by Nelson Rodrigues's famous phrase "complexo de vira-lata," for Brazil's national inferiority complex. For Brazilians, this future scenario presents glistening hope. A country with stronger economic power would mean the government has greater wealth to expend on infrastructure, crime control, education, healthcare, etc. What many Brazilians are not cognizant of are the pitfalls of economic prosperity. While Brazilians today may be envious of their wealthier northern neighbors, there are some aspects of a developed country's profile that are not worth envying. For example, the U.S. today far exceeds Brazil in the number of suicides, prescription drug overdoses, and mass shootings. GDP growth and economic projections depend on multiple variables, chief among them the global economic situation and worldwide political stability. A war in the Middle East, for example, can affect oil production and have global ramifications. Political stability within a country is also essential to its economic health. Elected presidents play a crucial role in a country's progress, especially as presidents may differ radically in their worldview. The political paths of the U.S. and Brazil are parallel today. In both countries, we've seen a left-wing regime (Obama/PT) followed by a far-right populist one (Trump/Bolsonaro), surprising many outside observers, and in the U.S. contradicting every political pollster, all of whom predicted a Trump loss to Hillary Clinton in 2016. In Brazil, although Bolsonaro was elected by a clear majority, his triumph has created a powerful emotional polarization in the country similar to what is happening in the U.S. Families, friends, and colleagues have split in a love/hate relationship toward the current presidents in the U.S. and Brazil, leaving broken friendships and family ties. Both presidents face enormous challenges to keep their campaign promises. In Brazil, a sluggish economy just recovering from a recession shows no signs of robust GDP growth for at least the next two years. High unemployment continues to devastate the consumer confidence index in Brazil, and Bolsonaro is suffering under his campaign boasts that his Economy Minister, Paulo Guedes, has all the answers to fix Brazil's slump. Additionally, there is no end to the destruction caused by corruption in Brazil. Some experts believe corruption to be the main reason why Brazil has one of the world's largest wealth inequality gaps. Political corruption robs government coffers of desperately needed funds for education and infrastructure, in addition to creating an atmosphere that encourages everyday citizens to underreport income and engage in the shadow economy, thereby sidestepping tax collectors and regulators. "Why should I be honest about reporting my income when nobody else is? The politicians are only going to steal the tax money anyway," one Brazilian doctor told me. While Bolsonaro has promised a housecleaning of corrupt officials, this is a cry Brazilians have heard from every previous administration. In only the first half-year of his presidency, he has made several missteps, such as nominating one of his sons to be the new ambassador to the U.S., despite the congressman's lack of diplomatic credentials. A June poll found that 51 percent of Brazilians now lack confidence in Bolsonaro's leadership. Just this week, Brazil issued regulations that open a fast-track to deport foreigners who are dangerous or have violated the constitution. The rules published on July 26 by Justice Minister Sérgio Moro define a dangerous person as anyone associated with terrorism or organized crime, in addition to football fans with a violent history. Journalists noted that this new regulation had coincidental timing for an American journalist who has come under fire from Moro for publishing private communications of Moro's. Nevertheless, despite overselling his leadership skills, Bolsonaro has made some economic progress. With the help of congressional leader Rodrigo Maia, a bill is moving forward in congress for the restructuring of Brazil's generous pension system. Most Brazilians recognize the long-term value of such a change, which can save the government billions of dollars over the next decade. At merely the possibility of pension reform, outside investors have responded positively, and the São Paulo stock exchange has performed brilliantly, reaching an all-time high earlier this month. In efforts to boost the economy, Bolsonaro and Paulo Guedes have taken the short-term approach advocated by the Chicago school of economics championed by Milton Friedman, who claimed the key to boosting a slugging economy was to cut government spending. Unfortunately many economists, such as Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman, disagree with this approach. They believe the most effective way to revive a slow economy is exactly the opposite, to spend more money not less. They say the government should be investing money in education and infrastructure projects, which can help put people back to work. Bolsonaro/Guedes have also talked about reducing business bureaucracy and revising the absurdly complex Brazilian tax system, which inhibits foreign and domestic business investment. It remains to be seen whether Bolsonaro has the political acumen to tackle this Godzilla-sized issue. Should Bolsonaro find a way to reform the tax system, the pension system, and curb the most egregious villains of political bribery and kickbacks – a tall order – his efforts could indeed show strong economic results in time for the next election in 2022. Meanwhile, some prominent leaders have already lost faith in Bolsonaro's efforts. The veteran of political/economic affairs, Joaquim Levy, has parted company with the president after being appointed head of the government's powerful development bank, BNDES. Levy and Bolsonaro butted heads over an appointment Levy made of a former employee of Lula's. When neither man refused to back down, Levy resigned his position at BNDES. Many observers believe Bolsonaro's biggest misstep has been his short-term approach to fixing the economy by loosening the laws protecting the Amazon rainforest. He and Guedes believe that by opening up more of the Amazon to logging, mining, and farming, we will see immediate economic stimulation. On July 28, the lead article of The New York Times detailed the vastly increased deforestation in the Amazon taking place under Bolsonaro's leadership. Environmental experts argue that the economic benefits of increased logging and mining in the Amazon are microscopic compared to the long-term damage to the environment. After pressure from European leaders at the recent G-20 meeting to do more to protect the world's largest rainforest, Bolsonaro echoed a patriotic response demanding that no one has the right to an opinion about the Amazon except Brazilians. In retaliation to worldwide criticism, Bolsonaro threatened to follow Trump's example and pull out of the Paris climate accord; however, Bolsonaro was persuaded by cooler heads to retract his threat. To prove who was in control of Brazil's Amazon region, he appointed a federal police officer with strong ties to agribusiness as head of FUNAI, the country's indigenous agency. In a further insult to the world's environmental leaders, not to mention common sense, Paulo Guedes held a news conference on July 25 in Manaus, the largest city in the rainforest, where he declared that since the Amazon forest is known for being the "lungs" of the world, Brazil should charge other countries for all the oxygen the forest produces. Bolsonaro/Guedes also have promised to finish paving BR-319, a controversial highway that cuts through the Amazon forest, linking Manaus to the state of Rondônia and the rest of the country. Inaugurated in 1976, BR-319 was abandoned by federal governments in the 1980s and again in the 1990s as far too costly and risky. Environmentalists believe the highway's completion will seal a death knoll on many indigenous populations by vastly facilitating the growth of the logging and mining industries. Several dozen heavily armed miners dressed in military fatigues invaded a Wajãpi village recently in the state of Amapá near the border of French Guiana and fatally stabbed one of the community's leaders. While Brazil's environmental protection policies are desperately lacking these days, not all the news here was bad. On the opening day of the 2019 Pan America Games in Lima, Peru, Brazilian Luisa Baptista, swam, biked, and ran her way to the gold medal in the women's triathlon. The silver medal went to Vittoria Lopes, another Brazilian. B. Michael Rubin is an American writer living in Brazil.

    Brazil Has No Exemplary Past or Present. But What Lies Ahead for the Country?

    For years, experts have debated what separates a developing country from a developed one. ...

    Mother and children asking for refuge in the US.

    Brazil Should Press Trump to Stop Cruel Treatment of Immigrant Children

    The Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reports that 55 Brazilian children are among the ...

    Rio's samba school Unidos da Tijuca - Tomaz Silva/ABr

    Rio’s Carnaval Celebrates Life and Blasts New President

    Rio de Janeiro’s world-famous Carnaval celebrations officially began on Friday in the first festival ...

    Terreirada Cearense Carnaval Block in Rio - Fernando Frazão/ABr

    Brazilian Justice Bans Carnaval Group for Celebrating Dictatorship and Torture

    Dubbed “the world’s biggest party,” Brazil’s Carnaval is officially underway and this year’s festivities ...