Brazil Calls EU Trade Commissioner Explanations in Hong Kong a Sham

The third day of negotiations at the 6th Ministerial Meeting of the World Trade Organization (WTO) began under a cloud of tension. After vetoing, Wednesday, December 14,  a proposal to set a date for the end of export subsidies, the European trade commissioner, Peter Mandelson, decided to provide an explanation.

He said that Europe would accept such a deadline, provided the decision also included the end of the so-called indirect subsidies, such as export credits and food assistance, conceded by the United States and other countries.

His justification irritated the members of the G20, the group of 21 developing countries led by Brazil and India. "This justification is a total falsehood. It’s a sham," remarked the Brazilian minister of Foreign Relations, Celso Amorim.

"They say they can’t reduce the subsidies, because that would omit alternative forms of distortion employed by other countries. That is not true. Either it [the deadline] applies to everyone or to no one at all," Amorim affirmed.

The agreement over ending export subsidies, concluded in July, 2004, enumerates all the forms of trade distortion that should be eliminated, but it doesn’t fix a date.

Faced with the impasse in negotiations in Hong Kong, the developing countries decided to focus their efforts on areas in which progress could effectively be made, such as the determination of this deadline.

"It is not that export subsidies are more important than other matters, but, in this case, the ball is sitting right in front of the goal and just needs to be kicked, unlike the other matters," Amorim argued.

In the Brazilian minister’s view, if the European Union accepted setting a date – probably 2010, as various countries have suggested – it would denote a willingness to continue the negotiations involving other areas in 2006.

"Unfortunately, they are using arguments that are so absurd and implausible that we can only believe that political desire is lacking,"

Amorim complained, a few minutes before the start of a meeting between the G20 and Mandelson. "I view all this, I confess, with a bit more pessimism. I try to maintain my optimism until the last possible moment, but I interpret these arguments as an excuse for not doing the homework they must do," the Brazilian Minister said.

Agência Brasil

Tags:

You May Also Like

Tangled Law

Brazil loves constitutions. Since the first one in 1824, the country has had six ...

A Boom Year for Brazil’s Agroexports to the Arabs

Brazilian agribusiness exports to the Arabs yielded US$ 337.5 million in July, an increase ...

LETTERS

Ten years ago Brazil had no public policy towards its youth. This July the ...

Brazil Has Already Law to Bar Invasion of Chinese Products

Brazil’s Foreign Trade Chamber (Camex) of the Ministry of Development, Industry, and Foreign Trade ...

A peasant from Petrolina, Pernambuco, in the Brazilian Northeast

The US-Brazil Accord on Ethanol Is Good for GDP But Very Bad for Rural Poor

During Bush’s visit to Brazil thousands of poor, rural members of the international Via ...

Brazil Ready to Sell Venezuela Electricity But Needs Link to Country’s Grid

Energy sector authorities from Brazil were in Venezuela recently observing that country’s problems with ...

The Brazilian invasion of Atlanta

Gold rush In 100 years of participation in the Olympics Brazil never had it ...

Can Brazil’s World Cup Leave More than White Elephants as Legacy?

A little over a year before the opening, 2014 FIFA World Cup projects are ...

Brazil Outlaws Nets for Catching Lobster

To put an end to predatory lobstering in Northeast Brazil, the government prohibited the ...

Brazilian Aircraft Maker Embraer Closes US$ 200 Million in Middle East Deals

Embraer, Brazil's aircraft maker, closed contracts for over US$ 200 million with companies in ...

WordPress database error: [Table './brazzil3_live/wp_wfHits' is marked as crashed and last (automatic?) repair failed]
SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_wfHits`