• Categories
  • Archives

Courts Often Restrict Press Freedom in Brazil

Folha de S. Paulo front page Folha de S. Paulo front page

Folha de S. Paulo front page During a recent public hearing of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights at the Organization of American States (OAS), in Washington, DC, the Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism (ABRAJI) called on the commission to consider the laws and judicial practices that violate freedom of expression in Brazil.

ABRAJI was joined in the effort by the freedom of expression international organization Article 19 and the Center for Justice and International Law (Cejil). They criticized particularly the abusive use of judicial lawsuits against the media, journalists and human rights defenders.

"Article 19, Cejil and ABRAJI are deeply preoccupied with the use of judicial measures that cause illegitimate restrictions to freedom of expression and inhibit the free flow of information and open debate on public interest issues. We call on the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to conduct a review of all issues presented during the hearing to assess their effects on human rights defenders and social communicators," said Article 19's Executive Director, Agnès Callamard.

Some of the problems include a weak legal framework; the excessive and coordinated use of civil defamation lawsuits; the high amount of lawsuits presented by public agents; the disproportional value of the indemnifications; the use of provisional injunctions preventing the publication of information prior to any publication, which may amount to prior censorship; and other indirect restrictions to freedom of expression.

There were reported specific cases and statistics were presented on the abusive use of lawsuits against journalists and human rights defenders in Brazil.

From 2005 to 2007, 53 cases of civil defamation lawsuits against the media reached the Superior Court of Justice. In 37.6% of these cases, the plaintiffs were public officials.

At the São Paulo State Court of Justice, 93 cases were presented between October and December 2007, and 47.4% of the lawsuits were filed by state agents.

The organizations also highlighted a strategy used by members of some groups in Brazil which consists of filing a wave of coordinated lawsuits in various parts of the country against one single journalist or media outlet, with the clear intention of silencing and intimidating these professionals with the excessive volume of cases. The Universal Church of the Kingdom of God has just done that against Brazil's largest newspaper, the Folha de S. Paulo.

Representatives of the Brazilian State and the National Federation of Journalists (Fenaj) participated in the hearing. They supported the current system of reparation for moral damages and the criminal treatment regarding defamatory statements.

According to them, the abuses mentioned in the document are exceptions, and not the rule. They also stated that the preoccupations expressed by Article 19, Cejil and ABRAJI do not result in intimidation or self-censorship.

The Inter-American Commission expressed preoccupation with the possibility of prior censorship through provisional injunctions, and asked the Brazilian State for more information regarding their use, as well as procedures and deadlines for review.

Commissioner Florentin Melendez mentioned that States should find a "rational balance" when there is a conflict between fundamental rights, and requested that the Brazilian State provide information on the measures taken to guarantee that this balance is reached within specific cases.

In their report, ABRAJI, Article 19 and Cejil recommended to the Brazilian State:

– A review of the legislation on freedom of expression with the purpose of aligning it to international patterns in the area;

– The adoption of clear, objective patterns for measuring the damages and deciding on the value of indemnifications; and

– The adoption of reparation measures which do not result in illegitimate restrictions on freedom of expression.

– Regarding the waves of lawsuits against journalists, the three organizations fully recognize the right of citizens to judicial reparations in cases where they have been defamed. However, the wave of coordinated lawsuits against one individual is not acceptable. The organizations recommend that the Brazilian State considers the adoption of such measures as allowing a unique centralized judgment when several lawsuits are filed by members of a given group.

The organizations also recommended to the Inter-American Commission that it conducts a review of all issues presented during the hearing to assess whether the current practices are in accordance with international human rights principles, and evaluate the effects that the mentioned practices may exert on human rights defenders and social communicators.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (2)

  • dito

    whashington should mention also that the government dont let the TVS show everything in the USA.
    I think Brazil should restrict its TVs of showing things. The violence, for instance , became like a disease that contaminated the country. But, who is the best professor of all in Brazil? TVs. I have analyzed that TV can be a good thing, but also a bad thing. Good thing in terms of educate people how to prevent from diseases ( aids, dengues and others) . On the other hand, TV’s become a good tutor of bad actions. Today in Brazil, the bandits see what other bandits do in Rio and Sao Paulo, and then apply other they see through TV. It is just a little example that TV has being doing in Brazil. I never put Globo in my home in the USA because this TV shows just bad things. I never see something good being showed in that channel. Let’s criticize the country. However, we to do our part to make our country a better place.

  • forrest allen brown

    let it be law
    that the truth can be printed

    right to burn the flag

    tell a goverment offical they are a bunch of crooks

    insult the country of brasil

    with out fear fine or going to jail when printed

    THEY DO IT HERE IN THE US EVEN WHEN THER ARE HERE ILLEGAL

    so what is rong with the truth

    LULA

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

Sahara Inspires Brazil’s Summer Collection

After serving as the scenery for books and films like The English Patient and ...

Brazilian President to Bring WTO Impasse to Meeting with Blair

The agenda of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s state visit to the ...

Petrobras and Braskem Team Up in Brazil in US$ 240 Million Project

Braskem and Petrobras Quimica, two giant Brazilian companies, announced, yesterday, their decision to invest ...

Tool to Protect Argentina from Brazilian Invasion Pleases Lula and Kirchner

Despite complaints of Brazilian entrepreneurs, the Presidents of Brazil, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, ...

Rio Claro, an Amazon tributary

Brazil’s Gift to the World in 2009: Lowest Amazon Deforestation in 20 Years

According to Brazil's first National Inventory of Greenhouse Gases, up to 75% of Brazil's ...

Brazil Has Already Exported More Than the Whole of 2003

Brazilian exports reached US$ 73.338 billion up until the second week of October, according ...

Brazil Wants to Sell More than Gems on the Rough

Entrepreneurs from the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul want to sell ...

Self-sufficient in Milk, Brazil Boosts Exports

Last year Brazil produced 22.2 billion liters of milk and reached self sufficiency.The country’s ...

Brazilian senator Heráclito Fortes

Brazilian Politicians Go to Court Against Clean Criminal Record Law

Despite having been found guilty of a crime by the Brazilian justice, thanks to ...

Who’s Left to Cheer Brazil’s Lula? Banks and Speculators.

Later, as always, palatian aulics gather around the Nation’s President to comment on the ...