New York Times Calls Bush Visit to Brazil and Argentina a Disaster

United States President George Bush visit to Latinamerica, which included Argentina, Brazil and Panama, was described as a "disaster" in a New York Times editorial accusing the US government of having completely failed in the recent Americas Summit held in Mar del Plata, Argentina.

"He and his delegation failed to get even a minimally face-saving outcome at the collapsed trade talks and allowed a loudmouthed opportunist like the president of Venezuela to steal the show", points out the NYT.

"In Argentina, Mr. Bush, who prides himself on his ability to relate to world leaders face to face, could barely summon the energy to chat with the 33 other leaders there, almost all of whom would be considered friendly to the United States under normal circumstances".

In Mar del Plata the US and 28 of the 34 participant countries tried unsuccessfully to re-launch the Free Trade Area of the Americas, FTAA, negotiations which have been frozen for over two years because of disagreements on US farm subsidies.

The controversial final Americas Summit declaration had to include a core paragraph outlining the differences which split the meeting.

"After President Bush’s disastrous visit to Latin America, it’s unnerving to realize that his presidency still has more than three years to run. An administration with no agenda and no competence would be hard enough to live with on the domestic front. But the rest of the world simply can’t afford an American government this bad for that long".

The NYT points out that the White House is in an uproar over the future of some of the president’s political advisers and cabinet members, "but the central problem is not Karl Rove or Treasury Secretary John Snow or even Donald Rumsfeld, the defense secretary. It is President Bush himself".

Finally the editorial suggests Mr. Bush should at least send a signal to the nation and the world that he was in charge and so "the next three years might not be as dreadful as they threaten to be right now".

This article appeared originally in Mercopress – www.mercopress.com.

Tags:

You May Also Like

Brazil: Which Part of Poor You Didn’t Understand?

The current minimum salary in Brazil is R$ 240 (US$ 80). Official unemployment is ...

It’s Brazilian Hélio’s day! A Cinderella Story at the Indy 500

On a day that could never have been imagined the very foundation of Brazilian ...

European Painters Worth US$ 50 Million Stolen During Brazil’s Carnaval

A spectacular robbery of art works by Picasso, Matisse, Monet and Dali marred the ...

Bush Administration Loses Case Against Brazilian Church in the Supreme Court

Americans United for Separation of Church and State lauded Tuesday’s, February 21, U.S. Supreme ...

When marijuana is a sacrament

There are signs that the Brazilian government might intervene in a cultural-religious practice in ...

Mergers and Acquisitions Fall 21% in Brazil

There were a total of 66 mergers and acquisitions in Brazil, in July, according ...

Brazilian Amazon Loggers Let Greenpeace Activists Go After 2-Day Siege

Eight Greenpeace activists who were prevented from leaving an Amazon town after having been ...

Brazilian Police Ordered to Release Names of the 100 Plus They Killed in Sí£o Paulo

Government prosecutors and public defenders (Ministério Público) in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, ...

Nothing Changes Says Brazil’s New Finance Minister

In his first press conference as Brazil’s new minister of finance, the president of ...

How to Marry a Brazilian

For an American citizen the road to marry a Brazilian can be rugged and ...

WordPress database error: [Table './brazzil3_live/wp_wfHits' is marked as crashed and last (automatic?) repair failed]
SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_wfHits`