US Sends Troops to Paraguay Just a Stone’s Throw from Brazil’s Frontier

    On June 1st, the Paraguayan National Congress entered into an agreement with Washington that allows U.S. troops to enter into Paraguay for an 18-month period.

    The troops will help train Paraguayan officials to deal with narcotrafficking, terrorism, government corruption and domestic health issues.


    The agreement grants the U.S. troops legal immunity from possible offenses committed during their stay.


    Washington has long sought similar immunity for its troops in the Southern Cone, but Argentina and Brazil have firmly restricted granting such judicial liberty to U.S. troops.


    Bolivian officials and its press are also speaking out against the agreement, fearing the U.S. presence as a means to control the petroleum and natural gas sources in their country.


    Though Asunción and Washington claim that the U.S. has no intentions of establishing a permanent base in Paraguay, history shows a strange resemblance between the current situation in Paraguay and the development of the Manta base in Ecuador from a “temporary” facility into a major base.


    Paraguay and the United States recently entered into an agreement that allows U.S. military personnel to enter Paraguay to train officials in counter-terrorism and anti-narcotrafficking measures.


    According to the Head of Social Communication of the Paraguayan Armed Forces, Col. Elio Flores, these U.S. Special Forces units will be working with the National AntiDrugs Secretariat, the Presidential Escort Regiment and the Air Transport Brigade.


    The U.S. will also provide financial assistance to help stabilize Paraguayan agencies which will be collaborating with U.S. authorities and institute a military-led initiative to provide health care services to the country’s poor in the northeast region of Canindeyu.


    Jose Ruiz, Public Affairs officer for the U.S. Armed Forces Southern Command office, informed that “some military training will be operational in nature,” and the goal is to better equip Paraguayans to deal with the threats of narcotrafficking, terrorism, government corruption and poverty.


    A contingent of 500 U.S. troops headed by seven officials arrived in Paraguay on July 1 with planes, weapons, equipment and ammunition. This group is the first of at least 13 U.S. units set to enter Paraguay until the agreement expires December 31, 2006.


    This agreement grants U.S. soldiers complete legal immunity from some of their actions while they are in the country, affording them the same privileges as diplomats as well as leaving them free from prosecution for any damages inflicted on the public health, the environment or the country’s resources.


    According to Servicio Paz y Justicia (SERPAJ) Paraguay, the Paraguayan National Congress passed this resolution allowing for the entry of U.S. forces with no debate, behind closed doors and with the public largely unaware of the entire transaction.


    Joining with SERPAJ, other human rights groups also have voiced their concern, with U.S. military instructors being criticized by human rights activists for having a history of teaching torture tactics to thousands of Latin American mid-level military officers at the U.S.-based School of the Americas since shortly after World War II.


    A sense of outrage and concern has flared up from neighboring countries. The U.S. forces are using the Mariscal Estigarribia airport base, which underwent construction by the U.S. in 2000 to allow for the reception of large numbers of troops and weapons and to also facilitate the landing of B-52 and Galaxy planes.


    With the facility having a capacity to hold 16,000 troops and its proximity to the borders of Argentina, Brazil and Bolivia, Paraguay’s South American neighbors are questioning Washington’s intentions at Mariscal Estigarribia, fearing that they may include more than just drugs and terrorism.


    Asunción’s initiative with the U.S. is cloudy enough to put the reputation of President Nicanor Duarte at serious risk. Presenting himself as a new force in Latin America, Duarte had appeared to be dedicated to close cooperation with the South American countries pursuing a policy of autonomy from the U.S.


    Now, Duarte’s critics are questioning his willingness to accommodate Uncle Sam, picturing him as the South American equivalent of El Salvador’s President Antonio Saca.


    Immunity Concession


    The decision by the Paraguayan legislature to proceed with the agreement came as a shock to Paraguay’s more powerful neighbors Argentina and Brazil, who repeatedly have refused granting comparable immunity to U.S. military officials.


    According to the Buenos Aires daily, El Clarí­n, the inability of Paraguay to hold U.S. forces accountable for their actions while in the region greatly undermines the power of the International Criminal Court and the Paraguayan judicial system.


    Particularly unnerving is the proximity of the Paraguayan base to the highly controversial Triple Border Area, where the three countries meet.


    Notorious for accusations brought against it for being a staging ground for terrorist plots, this new arrangement is meant to give the U.S. military a more justified presence in the eyes of many would-be critics, and also could someday provide for a greater ease of entry of U.S. forces into Argentina and Brazil.


    U.S. military presence in Latin America has been a given since the early twentieth century. It has come in many forms: covert and overt military aid, installation and support of a number of military dictatorships, training of military leaders who later were infamous for their cruelty, economic bribes and a number of other atrocities.


    U.S. influence throughout Latin America over the past century has led to the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent civilians and the violent militarization of many towns, cities and countries.


    Latin Americans are now extremely wary of Paraguay’s unprecedented agreement to provide the U.S. with legitimate, almost unquestioned authority so close to their own countries.


    Bolivia’s Raging Fears


    Paraguay’s entente with Washington has also caused alarm in Bolivia, whose border lies less than 250 km from the base at Mariscal Estigarribia. La Paz fears that the U.S. will use the base to transport large amounts of American-supplied weapons and personnel to Paraguay.


    The Bolivian media investigating the U.S.’ burgeoning presence in the region contends that Washington’s intentions are less directed to a military mission than that of influencing access to its neighbor’s natural resources.


    The Transnational Institute, an Amsterdam-based scholar-activist organization, observed that the response of the Bolivian press is understandable because there have been previous suspicions of outside forces wanting to exercise military control over the natural resources of the Chaco (Tarija) region.


    Suspicion of the U.S. military in Latin America is nothing new. The U.S. Army already has four Cooperative Security Locations (CSL), or permanent military bases (formerly called Forward Operating Locations (FOL), the Pentagon recently changed the terminology to imply a more “cooperative” effort), located in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba; Atuba-Curaçao; Manta, Ecuador; and Comalapa, El Salvador.


    Rumors have started that the Paraguayan base at Mariscal Estigarribia could become the next U.S. CSL. Despite Ruiz’s claims that the U.S. has “no plans of any kind” to remain in the region permanently and create another CSL, regional observers remain uneasy, recalling that the Pentagon initially used this same rhetoric to describe its presence at Manta, Ecuador when it at first minimized the facility as simply a “dirt strip,” only to later acknowledge its development into a major facility.


    Alejandro Valázquez, the agreeable “no problema” President of the Paraguayan senate’s Foreign Relations Committee stated in El Clarí­n on June 13 that “people fantasize a lot” about the possible negative effects of having the U.S. using the airport base.


    He then proceeded with attempts to assuage fears of a permanent U.S. military base by reminding the public that the U.S. and Paraguay are allies that need to defend each other.


    Representative William Cardozo, a Bolivian Social Democrat from the Department of Tarija, urged Bolivia’s interim president Eduardo Rodriguez to launch an investigation regarding the U.S. presence in the region.


    Tarija, located near the border with Paraguay, contains one of the two largest petroleum and natural gas reserves in Bolivia.


    An even more critical stance comes from Luis Chaquetilla, a member of the Unitaria Central Obrera Boliviana (COB), a powerful labor group in Bolivia, who commented that Washington has launched a military intervention through neighboring countries with the specific goal of controlling the gas reserves.


    Another Manta?


    Over US$ 80 million has been invested in the base in Manta, Ecuador which is now one of the best-equipped airports in Latin America. Yet much controversy has arisen over the influence U.S. military officials have in the region.


    At first, the Pentagon presented Manta as a dusty, archaic facility which it would operate solely for anti-drug and weather monitoring functions. Washington asserted that the base would function only for daytime use and would not permanently house U.S. personnel.


    Only a few days later the Pentagon clarified its original statement and outlined its full mission for Manta, which was to serve as a major U.S. military base tasked with a variety of security-related missions.


    Indigenous, religious and human rights groups protested the arrival of U.S. personnel in 1999, alleging that the presence of the U.S. facility would strongly infringe upon the autonomy of the Ecuadorian state.


    These groups worry that the Paraguayan agreement is similar to the one concerning Manta because of its focus on counter-narcotics surveillance.


    Yet since the arrival of U.S. armed forces in Ecuador, human rights workers have observed U.S. personnel engaged in anti-immigration efforts and even played a liaison role in the 2002 coup against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.


    After September 11. the United States government put pressure on Ecuador to allow expanded use of the Manta base to help fight the War on Terror, but no official agreement has been reached.


    While a CSL has yet to be established in Paraguay, the country will be more directly engaged in the War on Terror because at least some training of Paraguayan soldiers will be provided along with counter-terrorism tactics.


    Thus, while the U.S. military may not be using the Paraguayan base for offensive strategies, Asuncion’s forces are involved, assisted by those from Washington.


    The community of Mariscal Estigarribia, like Manta’s neighboring community Eloy Alfaro in Ecuador is a small and isolated area. While it remains unknown whether or not the U.S. will eventually turn the base into a CSL, it will no doubt become an important location involving substantial transportation of personnel, weapons, and training tools that will greatly affect the surrounding community.


    The Transnational Institute, which has done considerable research on the Manta CSL, acknowledges the validity of the longstanding rumors concerning the possible establishment of another CSL in the Southern Cone region.


    South America, and notably Bolivia, has become increasingly critical of the U.S. role in economic development in the region. Evo Morales, the Movement toward Socialism (MAS) party candidate for the upcoming presidential elections, continues to gain popularity amongst the different indigenous groups and has aimed a strong anti-imperialist message at the United States.


    Morales is one of the key leaders of the Bolivian coco growers’ movement and has been episodically critical of Washington’s militarizing anti-drug efforts in South America.


    The U.S. troops training Paraguayans in anti-drug efforts will only add fuel to Morales’ fire and that of like-minded Bolivian critics of U.S. expansion activities in the area.


    While it is clear that direct U.S. interests in the region subsided after the Cold War, and even came to a staggering halt after September 11, the United States is once again at work trying to build a quasi-military grid in Latin America.


    By entering into an agreement with Paraguayan officials, the U.S. will be able to successfully keep an eye out for the political unrest in Bolivia, maintain an influence in the highly sensitive Triple Border region and monitor activities of the de-facto left leaning alliance.


    Up to now Washington has expressed concern for the leftist regimes in Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina and Venezuela, with the likelihood that Bolivia, Ecuador and Mexico (if Lopez Obrador triumphs in that country’s 2006 elections) might join.


    While Paraguay alone exclusively has made an agreement that could very well infringe on its judicial power and ultimate sovereignty, the entire South American region could soon feel the after-effects of its domestic decision.


    Argentina and Brazil have successfully held off the U.S. military forces from gaining immunity in the area, but after several failed attempts to acquire a South American base of power, the U.S. now has a road paved for them by Paraguay’s 18-month agreement.


    For More Information:


    “Base militar de EEUU en Paraguay despierta inquieta en Bolivia.” ABC Color (Asuncion). 6 July 2005. http://www.abc.com.py/seccion.php?sec=7&fec=2005-07-06.


    “Bolivia Concerned about US Base in Paraguay.” Prensa Latina. 11 July 2005.
    http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID={AB7A170D-94F1-4CCA-BCEC-E76AE3B8E1AD}&language=EN


    “Contingente Militar de EEUU Llega a Paraguay.” 2 July 2005. http://bolivia.indymedia.org/gn/2005/07/20520.shtml.


    “Enrique Bolaí±os, Hugo Chavez : a tale of two Presidents.” ZNet Latin America. 4 July 2005. http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=20&ItemID=8222.


    “EUA no Paraguai.” 4 July 2005. http://agenciacartamaior.uol.com.br/agencia.asp?coluna=boletim&id=1351.


    Flynn, Michael “Ecuador: What’s the deal at Manta?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. January/February 2005.


    “Paraguay concedió inmunidad a las tropas de Estados Unidos.” El Clarí­n. 13 June 2005.
    http://www.clarin.com/diario/2005/06/13/elmundo/i-02015.htm.


    “Questionable Paraguay-US Military Exercises Commence.” Prensa Latina. 11 July
    2005.
    http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID={42AD11D9-A013-4A48-8E00-F0E9A55879AA}&language=EN


    Rubens Barbosa and Jessica Stern. “Triborder Dispute.” Foreign Affairs. January/February 2004. http://dev.foreignaffairs.org/20040101faletter83165/rubens-barbosa-jessica-stern/triborder-dispute.html.


    “U.S. Troops Set Up Shop.” Amerias.org. 3 June 2005.
    http://americas.org/item_19757.


    “Zero Hour in Bolivia: What to Watch for Today.” Narcosphere. 9 June 2005. http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2005/6/9/84257/46598.


    This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associates Mary Donohue and Melissa Nepomiachi.


    The Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA) – www.coha.org – is a think tank established in 1975 to discuss and promote inter-American relationship. Email: coha@coha.org.

    Tags:

    • Show Comments (9)

    • David Mitkos

      son,school,
      i agree with mandy!!!!! 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 :- :-* 😮 🙁 🙁 😉 😀 😉 🙂

    • Mandy

      BOOO THIS WEB SITE SUCKS!!!!!!! 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁 🙁

    • Guest

      get an idea,take charge,u ruin everthing
      everyone has there own opion about everything.no one has the right or wrong answer i mean why fight instead of helping one or the other.out of it all someone always comes up with the bright idea of”whos gunna be on top.”but if leaders and everyone would look out for the problems in there own countrys instead of whats going on in others something could change.like america.Bush is so wraped up in this war he doesnt see the things in his own country.Its the same around the world.people will be people.but lives are at stake when u fool around.get an idea take charge u ruin everything and start a war.thats what happenes

    • Guest

      guest
      THE USA IS A CORUPTED ENTITY–IN THE USA THEY PERMIT HOMOSEXUALS TO GET “MARRIED” WALK DOWN THE STREET NAKED AND ADOPT CHILDEN. IN THE USA–WOMEN GET ABORTIONS DAILY AS BIRTH CONTROL AND HAVE NO SADNESS ABOUT KILLING THE BABY. THE USA WOMEN ARE COLD HEARTED FEMININSTS WHO ARE SELFISH AND HATE MEN— ARE THESE THE THINGS PARAGUAY WANTS?? WILL THE USA ARMY FORCE THESE THINGS ON PARAGUAY??? WILL THE USA QUIETLY CHANGE THE MORAL FABRIC OF PARAGUAY?? PARAGUAY–IS THIS WHAT YOU WANT FOR YOUR CHILDREN??

    • Guest

      I don’t remember the War of the Triple Alliance because it happened long time ago, in a time where South America had not yet defined its borders and identities. It happened at the same time as the Civil War in the US just to give an idea of how long ago this was. Nobody in Argentina Brazil or Paraguay talks about that war, except in History books. Paraguay holds no grudge or claims any land that resulted from that war, so it is pointless to mention that. The three countries have had close ties, economically , politically and socially for a long time. I wonder what the US’ intentions really are…..Let’s hope they trully leave on December 2006.

    • Guest

      I am very concerned about these troops in Paraguay. Eventhough the US is saying that it won’t be there permanently, I don’t think they are saying the whole truth. I don’t believe the US government when they say things like that, especially coming from the current Administration. They just say things to calm people’s fears and concerns and then turn around and do something totally different. In other words, they are liars and manipulartors. They force our countries to do things which are against our national interest. They don’t care what happens to us. They just care about their own interest without regard for the consequences it brings to other countries. They don’t want to spread democary, they want to impose their life style and traditions upon the world. They want the American Empire.

    • Guest

      Priscila
      So what? Is that a reason for give immunity to American soldiers out of the blue. It’s not who is who, or who did what. Brazil was as wrong then, as US is now invading Iraq. And more, even after all of what we saw, the torture, humiliation, lack of professionalism by the American soldiers in Afeganistan, Iraq, do Paraguayans still want to learn from them? Moreover, what can US teach about curtailing corruption, they are no example for any of us in Latin America. Traying to get way with trade exploitation in the dispute settlement cases on WTO… US should mind their own business. The more they spread the worse the world gets. They should take care of there decaying economy and society values… I wish the best for PARAGUAY, and hopefully they will not be used once again by foreigners… be them Brazilians, Argentinians, Americans… All these countries want to play big. Who is gonna look after Paraguay’s interests? Are the people aware of their own choices? I don’t think so. Good luck, P.

    • Guest

      MN
      Brazil and Argentina have not been good neighbors to Paraguay in the past. Remember the war of the Triple Alliance? Many Paraguayans killed by Brazil, and the survivors put into slave labor camps.

    • Guest

      MN
      Brazil and Argentina have not been good neighbors to Paraguay in the past. Remember the war of the Triple Alliance? Many Paraguayans killed by Brazil, and the survivors put into slave labor camps.

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Mulata Azul (Blue Mulatto Lady) by Di Cavalcanti painted in the 1940s

    Brazil’s Own One Drop Rule

    Since I first began my travels to Brazil in September of 2000, my views ...

    Lula at Economist conference in 2008

    The Economist to Discuss Role of Brazil in New World Order

    The Economist. the British group who publishes a business magazine of the same name, ...

    Brazilian Marcelo with son Jeremy in Dubai

    This Brazilian’s Mission: Sell Dubai as Land of Opportunity

    When his ex-wife, Yasmin, moved to Dubai with the small Jeremy, in 2005, Marcelo ...

    Lula Pleased with Brazil’s Disarmament Operation

    A survey by Brazil’s Ministry of Health has found that there was a reduction ...

    UN Joins Brazil in Brazil for Meeting on World’s Rural Poverty

    The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)  announced plans to join forces with ...

    Bring the Brains Back

    The strength of the real, and lower tariffs among other things, are making Brazil ...

    Brazil Follows U.S. and Gets Back to Black

    Latin America took part in U.S. market enthusiasm, led by Brazil. Latin American receipts ...

    In Brazil, Inequality Is a Heirloom Passed from One Generation to the Next

    Why are there rich and poor countries? Why are there rich and poor continents? ...

    Brazilian imports

    Brazil’s Trade Surplus Keeps Shrinking Due to Growing Imports

    The Brazilian balance of trade is running a surplus (exports minus imports) of US$ ...