How Is Brazil Racist? Let Me Count the Ways.

     How 
Is Brazil Racist? 
Let Me Count the Ways.

    Brazil’s
    elite has been ashamed of its huge African descent population
    for centuries and as Brazilian doctor and sociologist Raimundo
    Nina Rodrigues himself once said, "the black race of Brazil…
    will always constitute one of the factors of our inferiority as a people."

    by: Mark
    Wells

     

    Since
    I discovered the beauty and complexities of the Brazilian people at
    the tail end of 1999, I’ve done all that I could to learn as much as
    I could about the largest country in Latin America. I have written three
    articles for this magazine and appreciate the various contributions
    of others in helping to make Brazzil the informative magazine
    that it is. I, as an American of African descent, do not know everything
    and do not claim to know everything about this Portuguese speaking country
    that I adore so much, and in the same manner, I don’t expect everyone
    else to know everything about it.

    Honestly
    there are a lot of things about my own country’s history that I still
    need to learn about! But every now and then an article will catch my
    eye that totally infuriates me. Every now and then when the issue of
    race comes up someone will say something that will make me lose my composure.
    It should come as no surprise because I will never forget when a well
    respected anthropology professor at my school could not understand the
    benefits that his father may have gained simply because of his whiteness
    at the expense of my grandfather’s blackness.

    In
    the past two weeks, two articles, "Blacks and Whites. We’re All
    Brazilians" & "A Trap for Blacks," both
    written by Janer Cristaldo, have succeeded in demanding that I compose
    a reply. Everyone has a right to voice their opinions and after I contemplated
    ignoring Mr.Cristaldo’s articles, I felt it necessary that I MUST voice
    my opinion also.

    Although
    the majority of this article is a direct response to Mr. Cristaldo’s
    comments, I hope that this article can stand alone as an informative
    piece for all. In the past month or so since my last article appeared
    in Brazzil, I have received many e-mails from all over the world.
    I can always tell whether the person writing to me is Brazilian or not
    from the tone of their letters. It seems that the vast majority of Brazilians
    who write to me continue to hold on to the outdated and defeated claim
    of a Brazilian "Racial Democracy" or like Cristaldo, "we’re
    all Brazilians" and treated equal.

    Take
    a paragraph from one particular e-mail I recently received in reference
    to my article "Where Did All the Blacks Go?" (March 2003):

     

    "I
    read your article and thought it was very interesting. I’m from Brazil
    and I live in America for about five years. I’m from Paraná,
    south of Brazil, even though I have dark brown hair—which for
    you Americans could be a reason for not considering me a white person,
    since here if you are not blonde with blue or green eyes you are not
    white—I see myself as a white. I think the problem is that you
    Americans give a lot of importance to race and we Brazilians do not
    care about it. For us it’s all about money. If there are two guys,
    one black but rich, and other white and poor, the black and rich will
    have much more dates than the white and poor. This is Brazil, this
    is so normal that many kids don’t know what race means. Why don’t
    they know? Because we do not hear a lot about race in Brazil, we don’t
    care about it and this is something you Americans cannot understand."

    This
    is an example of what I find difficult to grasp in the Brazilian attitude
    toward race and racism. How can this person say that she sees herself
    as white, an obvious choice, but then turn around and say that Brazilians
    do not hear a lot about race and that this is so normal that
    many kids don’t know what race means. If this person is really as
    color blind as she thinks she is, why does she see herself as white?

    If
    Brazilians don’t see race as much as Americans do, why do 54 percent
    of the Brazilian population see themselves as white? Why is it that
    so many Brazilians who claimed that they were white in the Brazilian
    census seem to have a problem with black Brazilian activists persuading
    gente de cor to affirm their African ancestry? It would be interesting
    to see how many Brazilians who continue to claim that we Brazilians
    are all mixed checked the branco/branca category when faced
    with the question of race in the last Brazilian census.

    Not
    Black, Not White

    If
    you truly see Brazil as a nation of mixed people, then you would reply
    to questions pertaining to race in a way that I once read singer Caetano
    Veloso respond: "I am neither white nor black". And finally,
    in analyzing the worn out "if you’ve got money you’re treated well"
    argument, how is it that this person doesn’t seem to realize that for
    every twenty white Brazilians she meets who have attained a moderate
    amount of wealth, she will encounter perhaps one black Brazilian with
    similar financial status?

    Here
    is another portion of the e-mail from the same person:

     

    "You
    say you were very surprised in my country, the same is happening to
    me here. When people look at me they see me as white, but when I start
    to talk they notice that I have an accent, that I’m from Brazil. Then
    I’m not white anymore, I become a Latina or Hispanic, since 99 percent
    of Americans think we speak Spanish and see Latino or Hispanic as
    race. They should learn more about race because there’s no such thing
    as Hispanic or Latino as race."

    As
    an African-American, I can speak in depth about the disease of racism
    that is rampant in the world today. While I don’t wish anyone to be
    subjected to racist attitudes, in some ways, I hope this Brazilian can
    learn from her American experience. In the same manner that she thought
    that she was white in America (only to be rudely awakened), millions
    of Afro-Brazilians think that Brazilian society sees them as equals
    until they experience racially motivated discrimination.

    First
    of all, let me say that Brazil and America are indeed two different
    countries, with two different histories and holding two different positions
    on the world stage today. But while there are several differences, there
    are also several similarities. My adoration of Brazil began when I learned
    that there were so many faces there that looked like mine and those
    of millions of others who in this country would be labeled as black
    or African-American.

    Since
    then, other facets of Brazilian history and culture have fascinated
    me also. Brazilian music, food, the obsession with futebol, Carnaval
    and the Portuguese language itself are but a few of the things that
    I have learned via the study of Brazil. I have also been introduced
    to the idea of racial identity and Brazilian style racism since I began
    my study of "all things Brazilian". As I said before, in this
    area, there are differences but also several similarities with American
    style racism. Perhaps more than the average Brazilian cares to recognize.

    Let’s
    take a look at a few of Mr. Cristaldo’s comments:

     

    1.
    "The country is discovering the mestiço. While
    the U.S. begins to recognize multi-raciality, some black groups in
    Brazil wanted even mulatos to declare themselves black on the
    last census. The purpose is obvious, which is to put pressure on the
    legislative power. Black Brazilians represented only 5.4 percent of
    the general population in 1999."

    2.
    "Bahia, (is) a state with a definite black majority…"

    The
    first point I must make is that although it is true that mulatos
    in the US are considered black, the mulato/mixed category is
    actually not new to the American census. In the late 19th century and
    early 20th century, there actually was a mulato category in official
    US census reports. The point here is that whether that person is considered
    mulato or black, in the majority of countries around the world,
    they are considered to be non-white but not non-black. As a matter of
    fact, the creation of the term pardo was developed as a way for
    the Brazilian government to hide the fact that it had such a high proportion
    of African descent people. (see this article: http://www.fapesp.br/livro59.htm)

    Now,
    the problem with Mr. Cristaldo’s reference to Bahia as a "state
    with a definite black majority" is the fact that he has already
    made it clear that he believes that the mulato category and the
    black category should remain separate. According to Brazilian Census
    reports, the state of Bahia is approximately 25 percent white, 20 percent
    black and 55 percent mulato. Now if mulatos/pardos are
    to be recognized as separate from pretos/negros, how can Bahia
    be a "state with a definite black majority"?

    The
    answer would seem to be simple for even someone like Mr. Cristaldo.
    Pretos and pardos together ARE Bahia’s "black majority."
    Statistically, it is impossible to separate the two categories and then
    claim that Bahia is a "state with a definite black majority."
    As blackness has always been looked upon as something to be ashamed
    of in Brazil, it is quite obvious that millions of Brazilians do not
    refer to themselves in this manner.

    Shame
    of Being Black

    In
    Frances Twine’s book Racism in a Racial Democracy: The Maintenance
    of White Supremacy in Brazil, we learn that it has been a custom
    for many years for Brazilian gente de cor (people of color) to
    list their children in a lighter racial category. Thus, pretos
    can become pardos and pardos can become brancos (white).
    In my second essay for this magazine, I wrote of my experiences with
    "Danielle" and her family, all of whom were dark-skinned black
    people but were all listed as pardos on their birth certificates.

    Now
    if dark skinned black people can be counted as mulatos, and the
    average Brazilian who looks like actress Camila Pitanga (who considers
    herself black) lists themselves as white, what does this tell us about
    the Brazilian census? It tells us that it hardly reflects the reality
    of the Brazilian population.

    In
    reality, Brazil’s elite has been ashamed of its huge African descent
    population for centuries and as Brazilian doctor and sociologist Raimundo
    Nina Rodrigues himself once said, "the black race of Brazil…will
    always constitute one of the factors of our inferiority as a people".

    Hmmm…Statements
    like that remind me of American-style racism.

    While
    racial characteristics can be seen, they can also be seen as a social
    construct. Thus, if we consider statistics such as income, education,
    illiteracy, life expectancy, and high blood pressure, which are influenced
    by a person’s position in society, we could indeed come to the conclusion
    that the differences between pardos and pretos in Brazil
    are indeed negligible. In simple terms, Mr. Cristaldo, this means that
    whether a Brazilian looks like Milton Nascimento, Dorival Caymmi or
    Clara Nunes, they will most likely be treated the same and have the
    same prospects for succeeding in Brazil.

    Mr.Cristaldo
    and millions of other Brazilians continue to point to the United States
    example as their justification for believing racism isn’t as prevalent
    in Brazil. True, in America, people generally label one as black or
    white, but the simple fact that so many Brazilians consistently label
    each other with so many different racial terms could be adequate reason
    to believe that Brazilians are perhaps MORE race conscious or perhaps
    more racist than Americans!

    There
    is yet another way to look at this perplexing issue of race. In my view,
    Brazil should either be broken into two racial categories (negro
    or branco) or four. I say four because if some black Brazilians
    are to be seen as being mixed, then white Brazilians must also be seen
    as mixed. Sure many Brazilian pretos or pardos look as
    if they may have some Native Brazilian or European ancestry, but similarly,
    the so-called "white" Brazilian often times has traces (sometimes
    more) of Native and African blood also.

    If
    racism in Brazil didn’t exist, there wouldn’t be so many people attempting
    to whiten their identity by any and every means, including Mr. Cristaldo.
    Here is an interesting story that I remember from a few years ago. There
    was this guy with whom I used to work a few years ago who I didn’t really
    remember until he told me who he was. He seemed to be a white guy, but
    he had shaven his head since last I had seen him. As the issue of race
    and national origin is fascinating to me, I couldn’t help but stare
    into this guy’s face. There was different about the way this white guy
    looked.

    If
    I didn’t know better I would have thought he had some strains of African
    blood flowing through his veins. Then he told me that he was Italian,
    which made all the sense in the world. Historians such as JA Rogers
    have long written about the extensive race mixing that has occurred
    between Africans, Italians, Spaniards and the Portuguese. In Luigi Luca
    Cavalli-Sforza’s massive study of human genes, The History and Geography
    of Human Genes, we learn that the DNA of certain populations of
    Europeans, particularly Italians and Spaniards, are much closer to that
    of Sub-Saharan Africans than those of other European nations.

    Because
    of the obvious African influence in the Spanish population, Rogers thought
    of Spain as an African nation in Europe. In his book Salazar and
    Modern Portugal, Hugh Kay calls the Portuguese a "mixed people"
    due to centuries of mixing with black Africans as well as Arabs. Now,
    my question is this: If Spanish, Portuguese and Italian people are said
    to have the blood of Africa flowing through their veins and yet remain
    white, why is it that a person of obvious African descent must be labeled
    as "mixed" because he/she has some non-African blood?

    This
    is the development of a racial hierarchy that values whiteness while
    denigrating blackness.

    While
    on the subject of DNA and phenotypes, let me also take the time to mention
    the recent work of anthropological geneticist, Spencer Wells. In Wells’
    work entitled The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey, Wells states
    his theory that the aboriginal peoples of Australia were among the first
    people to migrate out of Africa, through India and eventually landing
    in Australia.

    For
    many years, scientists have written that the DNA of Australian Aborigines
    is totally different than that of Africans even though in many ways,
    they, like other peoples of the southern Pacific islands, look like
    Africans. What does this have to do with Brazil? Well, I look at it
    this way. If anyone has seen photos of Australian Aborigines, they know
    that they have a very diverse phenotype. Most Aborigines have a dark
    brown skin color and hair that ranges from nearly straight, to wavy,
    curly with at times, blond coloring.

    Some
    photos of Aborigines remind of some of the diverse looks I have seen
    when walking the streets of Bahia. Anthropological research has also
    proven that the peoples of the African continent have the most diverse
    pool of genetics and phenotypes in the world. This destroys the myth
    that all Africans look alike. In reality, Africans have more physical
    diversity than any other people on the planet! My point is, if Wells’
    theory is to be accepted, then we must add the Australian phenotype
    to the already diverse African pool.

    Research
    has also proven that the phenotype that we refer to as Caucasoid is
    actually the youngest physical type to develop on the planet. This being
    said, no matter what racial mix a person is born of, if an African phenotype
    can range from the dark-skinned peoples of the Sudan, the "pepper
    corn" coiled hair of southern Africans, all the way to an Australian
    phenotype, then no matter what mix it took to come to that phenotype,
    it is still African. The British certainly didn’t ask to analyze the
    DNA of the Australian Aborigine before annihilating him! In their view,
    they were like any other non-white people.

    Italian
    Niggers

    To
    prove my argument even further, it is a known fact that white people
    DO discriminate among themselves according to skin tone, eye and hair
    color. Italians have long been referred to as "niggers" and
    faced great discrimination along the roads to their acquired whiteness
    in America because of their dark hair, features and certain African
    facial characteristics. Caucasians who have blond hair, pale skin and
    blue eyes are considered by most to "whiter" than their darker
    brunette counterparts.

    In
    her article, "Pale Perfection: White Women in Pursuit of an Aryan
    Ideal", M. Wilson analyzes what she calls the "hierarchy of
    feature preferences among Whites". Yet and still, brunettes with
    brown eyes and somewhat swarthy skin are still, for all intents
    and purposes, considered white. Why is it that black Brazilians who
    may not have skin complexions that are dark as oil or extremely pixaim
    (kinky) hair should not be considered black when this same standard
    is not applied to dark brunettes who claim to be white? Whether one
    realizes it or not, racial mixing between blacks, whites, and peoples
    of the Asian continent has been going on for much longer than the 16th
    century arrival of Europeans in the Americas!

     

    3.
    "However, while a negro is obviously afrodescendant, brown people
    are both afro and eurodescendant. If we adopt the new nomenclature,
    I will be forced to declare myself eurodescendant. No tarnish there,
    as far as I’m concerned."

    This
    argument has always been flawed to me. First of all, the vast majority
    of black people have varying degrees of brown skin! If a person’s skin
    is brown because of his/her African ancestry, and they have certain
    African facial features, most societies will label that person according
    to their African ancestry. It is this African and/or Native ancestry
    and somewhat dark skin that denies most "white" Brazilians
    official white status when and if they come to the US.

    And
    from your statements in these articles, Mr. Cristaldo, you don’t have
    to tell us that you "will be forced to declare" yourself
    a "eurodescendant" because it is quite obvious from your views
    how much you value your whiteness! If you ever come to the States though,
    don’t tell anyone if you have a pé na cozinha ("foot
    in the kitchen")!

     

    4.
    "In some of the email messages I received, I am accused of defending
    the argument that there is no racism in Brazil. In a certain way,
    I do defend it. Some form of racism we all have, or we would not be
    human. But never at the level of the U.S. or European countries. A
    black person, if rich or successful, is esteemed and even envied in
    Brazil. Millions of Brazilian whites would feel extremely honored
    to be photographed next to a Pelé."

    5.
    "During my Porto Alegre years, I was a regular at the table of
    Lupicínio Rodrigues, whom I much admired, at the Adelaide bar.
    Lupicínio—who wrote the most beautiful samba lyrics in
    Brazil—was universally loved by all gaúchos."

    6.
    "Although our population has an expressive white majority, it
    was the first state in the country to elect a black governor, Alceu
    Collares."

    It
    is truly a shame that in the year 2003 people continue to use Brazilian
    entertainers and athletes such as Pelé to try and down play the
    effects of racism in society. Many people use this same logic in the
    US. Just because you allow a black person to entertain you doesn’t necessarily
    mean you would like for a person who looks like them to be your neighbor,
    marry your daughter or be president of your country.

    The
    success of a few black people in Brazil does not stop the daily bouts
    of racism that the average black Brazilian must endure. Also, when it
    comes to wealth and success, it still doesn’t mean that a racist white
    person will accept a black person as their social equal. It is only
    when that wealth and success is RECOGNIZED that that person of color
    MAY get the respect they should have received in the beginning.

    Governor
    Benedita da Silva and the late great geographer Milton Santos have spoken
    in interviews about being stopped when entering important political
    or academic meetings by people who assumed that they didn’t belong there
    because they were black. It’s also funny that you should mention Alceu
    Collares being elected governor. In 1993, in Vitória, state of
    Espírito Santo, a 19-year old black female college student named
    Ana Flávia Peçanha de Azeredo was assaulted and punched
    in the face by a 40-year old white woman and her 18-year old son over
    the use of an elevator in an apartment complex.

    Know
    Your Place!

    In
    Brazil, still today, maids must use the back service elevator while
    residents use public elevators. These two people were infuriated by
    the fact that this black girl didn’t "know her place" and
    insisted on teaching her a lesson. This matter of extreme hostility
    probably would have never been published in newspapers had the girl
    not been the daughter of Espírito Santo governor Albuino Azeredo,
    a black man.

    A similar
    incident happened to the family of futebol superstar Ronaldo.
    According to reports, when Ronaldo’s mother Sônia, aunt Dirce
    and sister Ione tried to enter a R$1.5 million (US$ 500,000) condominium,
    their entrance was blocked as they were told by a neighbor that he didn’t
    want to see the building frequented by "people of the lower level"
    and "favelados" (shanty town dwellers). This incident
    must be analyzed for several reasons:

    One,
    Ronaldo is one of the highest paid soccer players in the world, thus
    his family is obviously well taken care of. But because they were Ronaldo’s
    family and not Ronaldo himself, their social and economic level was
    judged by their appearance (i.e. their color). This demonstrates my
    point. They obviously have money but the color of their skin is associated
    with poverty, criminal activity and other negative connotations.

    Once
    again, this has nothing to do with social class!

    Two,
    most Brazilians know that Ronaldo’s mother is not very dark-skinned.
    She would be considered a mulata or morena by Brazilian
    standards. Yet and still, she was treated like a common criminal. In
    this situation, it is clear that whether an Afro-Brazilian has clearly
    definable African physical characteristics or a more racially mixed
    appearance, in the end, they are treated as black people.

    Was
    this a matter of social class? I think the point has been well
    established.

    While
    Brazil may have a few successful black politicians, it is only because
    they are considered "safe" by the majority of the population.
    In the same way that so many Americans claim that they admire Colin
    Powell, what would happen if he were to start talking more about reparations
    for African-Americans? The majority of his white admirers would probably
    leave him faster than David Duke at a Black Panther rally!

    Mr.
    Cristaldo, I ask you to read your own words: "A black person, if
    rich or successful is esteemed and even envied in Brazil."

    In
    other words, if he is a regular person earning two to three minimum
    salaries like the majority of black Brazilians, he is NOT esteemed or
    envied. Athletics and entertainment are never accurate curriculums in
    order to study the level of equality in a country. Let’s take the US
    for example. Between the three major sports leagues, NBA (basketball),
    NFL (football) and MLB (baseball), there are less than 3,000 openings
    for an athlete to fill in any one of the more than 90 teams. At last
    count, the American population stood at some 280 million people. Even
    if we assumed that only 30 million were men who were of professional
    sport playing age, it is obvious the astronomical odds against him earning
    one of those coveted positions.

    In
    Brazil, let me remind you that the majority of the futebol players
    earn maybe a few minimum salaries and it has also been discovered that
    white players earn more than black players. Brazilian soccer has been
    traditionally one of the few occupations that Afro-Brazilians have been
    allowed to excel in. (Below is an excerpt from a doctoral thesis in
    sociology)

     

    "Studies
    with 327 players of 17 clubs from Rio show that while 26.6 percent
    of white athletes earn up to a minimum salary, among blacks the proportion
    is 48.1 percent. The percentage is 34.9 among all players. At the
    top of the salary pyramid, 24.8 percent of whites earn more than 20
    minimum salaries; among blacks, the percentage is 14.8, below the
    average among all players (17.1 percent earning more than 20 minimum
    salaries)."[Minimum wage in Brazil is 240 reais a month or around
    80 dollars.]

    Like
    in the US, black people are thought to be good in sports and entertainment,
    but what many Brazilians don’t seem to realize is that when Brazilian
    futebol was first beginning to organize leagues, Afro-Brazilians
    were not allowed to play because the game was só para brancos
    (only for whites). As a matter of fact, when the first black Brazilian
    players were allowed to play for the famous Fluminense soccer club,
    they were forced to wear rice powder on their faces in order to appear
    lighter and also straighten their hair. The nickname of the team’s cheer
    even today is known as pó-de-arroz (rice powder) because
    of this racist practice.

    I suppose
    this was because of social class, right?

    Numbers
    Show Inequality

    The
    situation becomes worse when we consider the lack of Afro-Brazilians
    in the Brazilian Congress, the number of black businessmen and women
    and the number of black Brazilians in college. The rate of illiteracy
    was reported to be 26 percent for Afro-Brazilians while it is 10 percent
    for whites. Of the 513 members of Congress, only 12 are of African descent
    while only two of the 81 senators are of African ancestry. Afro-Brazilians
    are 63 percent of the Brazil’s poor and less than 16 percent of the
    students graduating from a university (in 1998), according to government
    figures.

    I will
    not go on with statistics because these inequalities have been prominently
    featured in past issues of this magazine. The point that I am trying
    to prove is that these are statistics with which to judge quality of
    life in a particular social environment. In Brazil, it has never been
    the intention of the government to allow Afro-Brazilians the same opportunities
    as white Brazilians. The republic, like in the US, was built on racism.
    After abolition of slavery, the Brazilian elite financed the immigration
    of millions of Europeans to Brazil to replace African slave labor while
    banning immigration from Africa.

    Brazil
    had millions of both free people of color and recently freed slaves
    in which to fill employment opportunities. They chose not to. There
    is no way to blame social class on this choice for race is the
    ONLY factor! The Brazilian elite didn’t care if the slaves who built
    their country rotted and died in the streets, and for those who DID
    manage to survive, they promoted widespread miscegenation with white
    Brazilians in order to eventually erase all traces of African ancestry
    in the population.

    Don’t
    believe it? In 1911, João Batista de Lacerda represented Brazil
    in the first Universal Congress of the Races in London and proudly proclaimed
    that within a century of miscegenation, black people would ultimately
    disappear from Brazilian society. While the Americans were violently
    slaughtering black people, Brazil’s leaders chose to try and mix the
    African blood right out of the country. As a matter of fact, folklorist
    and literary critic Silvio Romero, in his haste to whiten the Brazilian
    population, criticized recent German immigrants because they resisted
    mixing with Brazil’s large colored population. Again, these ideals have
    nothing to do with one’s social class.

    While
    it is possible for one person to have a different interpretation of
    why social classes in Brazil seem to be divided by race, these are the
    facts! Do the research!

    Now
    in my response to point number 6, I mentioned that when Afro-Brazilians
    were finally allowed to join futebol clubs, they were forced
    to wear rice-powder on their faces in order to mask their dark-skinned
    faces. Another fact that the average Brazilian who doesn’t believe racism
    exists in Brazil (or that it is at least not as strong as American racism)
    doesn’t seem to know is that in the history of Brazilian stage and film,
    Brazilian Indians were not permitted to become actors, thus, Afro-Brazilian
    actors were hired to play Indian roles with their faces painted red!

    At
    the same time, when roles in plays were to depict black people as major
    characters, white actors were hired to play these roles with their faces
    painted black! Many African-Americans are familiar with the racist American
    film era in which white actors such as Al Jolson wore blackface
    to depict stereotypes of black people and this is yet another example
    of the extreme level of racism that is an intimate part of America’s
    cultural and racial past.

    These
    racist images of African-Americans is another subject that infuriates
    the average black American who is familiar with American history. So,
    again, we have another example of Brazilian racist practices that were
    identical to American racist practices. So I would like to know how
    you, Mr.Cristaldo, would deny this overt form of racism in Brazil’s
    past, the very foundation of the racism that exists in Brazil today.

    Is
    It All True?

    If
    you would like to read a little about the blackface/redface era
    in Brazilian film and theatre, check out Robert Stam’s book Tropical
    Mulitculturalism. Also in the book Bossa Nova by Ruy Castro,
    we learn that in the 1950s, actor/activist Abdias do Nascimento was
    once fired from the play Orfeu that was directed by white singer/songwriter/poet
    Vinicius de Moraes and replaced by a white actor who played the part
    in blackface. In the Stam book, we also learn that the Brazilian
    elite were infuriated when they learned that famed American film director
    Orson Welles planned to use a majority Afro-Brazilian cast for his film
    It’s All True.

    Mr.
    Welles was constantly harassed by "government thugs" and the
    Brazilian media who didn’t want Welles to relay to the world images
    of Brazilian favelas, "no-good half-breeds" and "dances
    of negros covered with maracatu feathers, reminiscent of the
    temples of the African wilds". The Brazilian media blasted Welles
    for his insistence on using black actors and composers and presenting
    Rio as if it were "another Harlem". The It’s All True
    controversy was a mark on Welles’s career that eventually led to the
    demise of his career. For your information, Mr.Cristaldo, using blackface
    or redface so that people of certain "undesirable"
    races are excluded from a situation has NOTHING to do with social
    class!

    Let
    us also not underestimate the role that the entertainment industry and
    media play in influencing our opinions of certain issues. With this
    in mind, let us also remember this when we walk the streets of Bahia
    (a 75 percent black state) and never see a black face on the cover of
    a magazine (except for Raça Brasil) or rarely see a black
    face on Brazilian television (except as criminals, maids, pagodeiros,
    futebol players).

    I have
    spent a total of 11 weeks in Bahia and I’ve seen it! Let us also remember
    that in all the years of Brazilian beauty competitions, only once has
    a black woman been crowned Miss Brasil (Deise Nunes de Souza in 1986).
    In this sense, even a country like America, that many Brazilians deem
    to be extremely racist, have made more progress in this area as there
    have been at least five black Miss Americas, including Vanessa Williams
    in 1984, Suzette Charles (who completed Williams’ reign after a scandal),
    Debbye Turner in 1990, Marjorie Vincent in 1991 and recently Erika Harold.

    As
    physical beauty is said to be in the eye of the beholder, this also
    has nothing to do with social class. What is your argument here,
    Mr.Cristaldo?

    Oh,
    and Mr.Cristaldo, while you ponder that question, take some time and
    study some of those old Carnaval Samba lyrics that you have probably
    sung over and over and tell me how they depict Afro-Brazilian women?

    Ultimately,
    my question to Brazilians who consider themselves to be white is:

    If
    you do indeed look and are accepted as white, how are you in any position
    to speak on whether racism exists in Brazil or not?

    Let’s
    consider a comparable condition. Is a man in any position to dismiss
    the discomfort that a woman may complain about during her menstrual
    cycle?

    The
    point is, while it is indeed possible that you may have never heard
    any subtle or blatantly racist comments or witnessed racist acts in
    Brazil, it is far more important to ask a black Brazilian if THEY have
    ever experienced racism or if THEY think racism is strong in Brazil.
    I HAVE asked countless black Brazilians about this issue. I have yet
    to meet a black Brazilian who says that racism in Brazil isn’t a powerful
    force.

    In
    comparison, whose opinion is more likely to be true? The outsider or
    the insider? If a white person and a black person get the same job and
    have the same credentials and experience, but the white person is paid
    more money and the only difference between the two people is race, is
    this also a class issue? Since most people don’t talk about their
    income, how would you know if racism was at work or not? While on this
    subject, I would like to mention that while black Brazilians may be
    able to give a more accurate view or personal experience of/with racism,
    this is not to say white Brazilians or Americans don’t see how much
    racism is intertwined in our everyday interactions.

    For
    those Brazilians who still believe that black Brazilian activists continue
    to complain about a problem that doesn’t exist, or at least as in America,
    I encourage you to read the work of Antonio Sérgio Alfredo Guimarães
    (associate professor of Sociology at the University of São Paulo),
    Nelson do Valle Silva and Carlos Alfredo Hasenbalg (both of IUPERJ/Rio
    de Janeiro). They are all white Brazilian sociologists who have written
    extensively on how race determines one’s success in Brazil. I think
    the title of one of do Valle Silva’s essays says it all: The Cost
    of Not Being White in Brazil.

    Before
    anyone wants to debate about this issue of race and racism in Brazil,
    I ask that you take the time and read some of the works of these scholars.

    Now,
    let us consider for a moment that the sayings and proverbs of a society
    reflect its views to a certain degree. With that point in mind, is anyone
    familiar with these sayings?

     

    "Branca
    for marriage, mulata for sex, preta for work"

    "If
    a negro doesn’t shit on his way in, he shits on his way out"

    "A
    good negro is born dead"

    "He
    is black, but he has the soul of a white"

    "The
    negro does not eat, he gulps"

    "The
    negro is like a bad chamber pot, it does not break"

    Well,
    as much as Brazilians like to claim American society is far more racist
    than that of Brazil, all of these sayings come from Brazil!

    And
    once again, Mr.Cristaldo, these sayings have nothing to do with social
    class!

    The
    Black Stigma

    With
    such proverbs, is it any wonder why so many Brazilians don’t want to
    be associated with being black? Ask yourself, if racism isn’t as strong
    in Brazil as it is in other countries, why do so many black people not
    want to be or be called black? Where did they get this attitude from?
    I have experienced subtle and extreme forms of racism in my own life
    and many of these situations are exactly the same as those I hear about
    as told by black Brazilians.

     

    7.
    "In Brazil we never had any laws denying blacks any rights."

    This
    argument is also flat. Official laws and signs saying "no blacks
    allowed" are not necessary if the rules are socially enforced,
    which is what happened in Brazil during America’s infamous "Jim
    Crow" years. I have read as well as heard from several black Brazilians
    who remember when they were denied entrance into certain establishments
    because they were black. There were no signs on the door, yet they were
    not allowed to enter.

    In
    several books about Brazil, it has been reported that Afro-Brazilians
    were barred from entering prestigious social clubs even when they had
    the money for the special membership fees. In the Frances Twine book,
    we find that black people were often times not allowed to walk on certain
    sides of the street! Again, no signs, but it was it a socially accepted
    and enforced custom.

    Question:
    If one man is shot in the head six times and dies immediately and another
    man dies slowly from smoke inhalation, is the end result any different?

    The
    point here is, both American and Brazilian systems of race-based discrimination
    achieved similar means in different ways, but with the same result.
    As a matter of fact, American style racism seems to have learned a few
    tricks from its Brazilian counterpart in the past 40 years or so! This
    doesn’t mean that Brazil hasn’t had a history of violence against its
    black citizens as past police repression of capoeira performances
    and Candomblé rituals have proven.

    Afro-Brazilians
    were frequently beaten, thrown in jail and their artifacts confiscated
    during police raids. Hmmm…Sounds suspiciously like America of the
    1950s and 60s.The difference here seems to be that the Brazilian elite
    was smart enough not to broadcast these images to the rest of the world
    on television thus keeping their racist practices hidden.

     

    8.
    "In Florida, marriage between whites and blacks was forbidden…"

    Inter-racial
    unions in the US were forbidden by many states but that didn’t mean
    that they didn’t occur. Even after slavery, white men continued their
    sexual abuse of black women and right into the 1970s continued to exploit
    black women who worked in their homes as domestic servants by threatening
    them with dismissal unless they gave in to their (white male) sexual
    desires.

    Also,
    quiet as its kept, there have been illicit sexual affairs between blacks
    and whites, men and women in America’s "closet". There are
    stories of white women who voluntarily gave up their status as "respectable"
    white women in order to marry and raise families with black men. I agree
    that race mixing was and continues to be more prevalent in Brazil, but
    that doesn’t mean that it is accepted as much as it suggests tolerance.

    Actor/singer
    Tony Tornado revealed how the Brazilian media banned mixed race couples
    from being shown on television. While inter-racial marriage may have
    never been outlawed in Brazil, sociologist Florestan Fernandez, in his
    classic study of Brazilian race relations, The Negro in Brazilian
    Society, collected statistics that showed that 85-90 percent of
    white Brazilians disagreed with the marriage of one of their family
    members with a preto/a or pardo/a.

    Another
    of Brazil’s best kept secrets is that there have been incidents of black
    people being killed because they married someone white. Brazil also
    has a similar history of the sexual exploitation of black women. Young
    , white Brazilians boys were expected to have their first sexual experiences
    with black girls/women who worked in the homes of whites as domestic
    servants.

    That
    doesn’t sound like the good ol’ US of A now does it?

     

    9.
    "Blacks and whites inter-marry, drink and eat in the same restaurants,
    work and make friends in the same classrooms. If there are less blacks
    than whites at the universities, this is due to economic, but never
    juridical factors."

    Like
    in America today, people don’t always reveal their true feelings. If
    a person doesn’t mind being around a certain type of people because
    in his/her mind he feels that he is "above" or "better"
    than them, does this mean that they do not harbor racist feelings? In
    John Burdick’s book Blessed Anastacia, he writes of how some
    white girls in a Rio de Janeiro church could not understand how a particular
    attractive, successful white guy could possibly marry a preta.

    In
    other words, how could he marry that ugly preta when so many
    beautiful brancas are available? Burdick also reveals how many
    black girls at dances in Rio would keep to themselves because of the
    fear of humiliation at the hands of white and even black guys (who would
    viciously criticize their dark skin or kinky hair) as well as the fact
    that none of these boys would ask them to dance.

    As
    far as economic factors influencing college entrance, this is true.
    But you failed to mention how these economic differences are related
    to race. Let me explain, it’s actually quite simple. Let’s imagine that
    we both reply to the same job ad. Let us keep in mind the famous Brazilian
    job requirement of "boa aparência" (good appearance,
    good looking), which is code talk for "no blacks allowed".
    Now on the one hand, you, the white guy gets the job and I don’t or
    on the other hand, we both get hired but you are paid significantly
    more than me for doing the same work.

    This
    is a common occurance in Brazil as well as in America (See A cor
    da desigualdade: desigualdades raciais no mercado de trabalho e ação
    afirmativa no Brasil by Rosana Heringer). These studies prove that
    as hard as it is for Afro-Brazilians to get into college, often times
    when they DO graduate, they are usually paid less money and promoted
    to higher employment positions slower and less frequently than their
    white counterparts of similar educational background.

    Getting
    back to my example, whether I get the job earning less money than you
    or don’t get the job and must settle for some sort of menial labor,
    you are now in a better economic position. Better economic position
    leads to better social position. Let’s suppose you are paid R$800
    per month and I end up in a job where I earn between $R250 and R$350
    per month. Let’s also imagine that you get promoted and earn higher
    salary raises than I. After 15-20 years on the job you can see how our
    social situations could vary.

    You
    may marry someone, most likely a white woman, who earns about R$550
    per month while I would most likely marry a black woman who faces the
    same type of discrimination as I, and earns R$200 per month. Your family
    income could be as high as R$900 more than my family income. We both
    have kids, but while you earn enough money that your child doesn’t have
    to work and thus can attend school and get an education (and eventually
    get a good-paying job), my child must leave school before completing
    5 years, and get a job in order to bring home some form of income.

    Now
    imagine this cycle is passed on over and over for several generations
    and you can now understand why the middle class stays predominantly
    white while the lower class stays predominately black. Capitalism is
    a system that functions on inequality; men over women, white over black
    and young over old. Thus, the practice of racism, sexism and age discrimination
    actively promote social inequality. Just because you cannot see it or
    it hasn’t happened to you doesn’t mean that it doesn’t happen!

    Brazil
    managed to develop a socially unequal society according to race without
    implementing the legally sanctioned racism of the US or South Africa.
    Black and white people eating, dancing or even having sex together are
    not the applicable factors that determine whether racism is an active
    ingredient in multiracial societies. When we study the factors that
    do (health, socioeconomic status, education), we find that race and
    racism factor prominently in explaining persistent inequalities in life.

    Edward
    Telles is yet another sociologist whose studies of racism in Brazil
    prove that many inequalities that persist in Brazil today cannot be
    simply explained away as a result of social inequalities. If race was
    not a decisive factor in most facets of Brazilian life, you would have
    a more even distribution of blacks and whites in MOST facets of Brazilian
    society. Instead, Brazilian politics, media and business are all dominated
    almost exclusively by brancos.

    How
    to Gage Racism

    For
    women who believe that racism doesn’t exist in Brazil, ask yourself
    this question: If men and women socialize together in society, get married
    and have children together, does this mean that sexism doesn’t exist?
    Because men and women interact everyday does this mean that it’s not
    possible for a man to earn more money for doing the same job simply
    because he is a man?

    While
    questioning the influence of race, we must also realize that Brazilian
    society, like American society, is dominated by white MEN. If one is
    able to clearly see the existence of sexism, the same thought process
    must be applied to the complexities of racism.

     

    10.
    "Poor whites—and there are legions of them—have the
    same difficulty to access upper level education that poor blacks have.
    Rich blacks—and they also exist—have the same easiness of
    access that rich whites have. There is no reason, though, for this
    hatred to be exported to Brazil. In this country, from the legal point
    of view, blacks were never discriminated."

    Although
    I know that there are millions of poor white Brazilians, statistically,
    two-thirds of people living in poverty in Brazil are black. And there
    is no need to import hatred to Brazil because racial discrimination
    is a matter of fact in the daily lives of millions of Brazilians. Once
    again, legal discrimination does not matter if everyone chooses to socially
    honor a racial hierarchy that places whites first and blacks last.

    Remember
    one thing. If a black man and a white man both start off in the same
    socio-economic position and both go to college and improve their lives,
    the white man will forever be able to disassociate himself (or even
    forget) from his poor beginnings because his skin color will give people
    the idea that he was always successful. On the other hand, like in the
    example of Ronaldo’s family, the black man will still have to consistently
    prove that he is successful because his skin color is associated with
    failure and lower class life.

     

    11.
    "The word `racism’, not very frequent in the Brazilian press
    of past decades, now deluges the pages of newspapers."

    Again,
    read your history! The reason why racism wasn’t discussed as much in
    the past was because during the Brazilian military dictatorship years,
    to raise the issue of racism was considered a crime! Black militants
    who spoke out against racism were in danger of imprisonment, torture
    or even death under this regime, particularly during the hardline years
    after 1968. Several black activists chose to go into exile during this
    period, the most prominent being Abdias do Nascimento.

    In
    the years following the end of slavery, there were several Afro-Brazilian
    organizations that were formed to fight racism, the Frente Negra
    Brasileira (Brazilian Black Front) being the most prominent along
    with Nascimento’s Teatro Experimental Negro. There were also
    countless Afro-Brazilian newspapers that spoke directly to people of
    African descent concerning the condition of black Brazilians.

    The
    FNB was forced to shut down by the Vargas regime in the 1930s
    and black organizations didn’t really have another chance to organize
    again until the gradual abertura (the reduction of political
    repression) of the dictatorship in the late 1970s. Once again, you may
    not have been aware of these organizations because as a white Brazilian,
    you have never had to deal with issues of racism.

    I repeat,
    just because you cannot see something doesn’t mean that it doesn’t
    exist!

     

    12.
    "How can a poor, white kid face without animosity a black student
    who has taken his place in college only because the latter is black?"

    I have
    a better question. Actually a few. Why did the Brazilian elite choose
    to bring in millions of Europeans at the beginning of the 20th century
    and not Africans? In the 1970s, why did your Brazilian government consistently
    vote in favor of a racist apartheid regime in South Africa as well as
    voting in favor of Portuguese domination over its African colonies when
    casting its vote with the United Nations?

    Why
    is it that some Portuguese slave owners set their barns full of black
    slaves on fire after learning of the abolition of slavery? How is it
    that after 500 years of white privilege, power and advantage you can
    even use your fingers to ask something that ridiculous? Why is it that
    you can so easily see when a program is set up to benefit someone black
    but cannot see the overwhelming benefit of white Brazilians since the
    Portuguese stole the land that came to be known as Brazil? With all
    of the evidence I have presented in this paper, I should be able to
    rest my case. When you do the research and learn that everything that
    I have written is true, feel free to write and say, "Oh! I’m sorry,
    I didn’t know!"

    I DO
    agree that quotas in universities is not the answer to erasing racism
    and inequality in Brazil, but with illiteracy levels in places like
    Bahia being anywhere from 50-75 percent, in order for TRUE change to
    be made, the entire educational system needs to be destroyed and reconstructed.
    Right now, with the average black Brazilian averaging only about five
    years of school, there aren’t enough of them to take advantage of the
    quotas anyway. I think the government just wanted to show that they
    were willing to do something after so many years of doing nothing.

     

    13.
    "When federal judge Bernard Friedman established the policy of
    affirmative action in the Law School of the University of Michigan,
    Americans began to realize that the quota policy was a wretched idea."

    Again,
    in America, blacks have only really been free since 1965, so how can
    people begin to complain about something that has existed for less than
    40 years when the previous 346 years promoted nothing but white privilege?
    The last I checked, 98 percent of all businesses in the US were still
    white-owned, thus the power structure hasn’t been shaken.

    Bush
    and Affirmative Action

    So
    why are people so alarmed about Affirmative Action? If it weren’t for
    Affirmative Action (white privilege), George W. wouldn’t have made it
    through school! If it weren’t for white privilege, there would be huge
    vacancies at schools like Yale, Princeton and Harvard. If it weren’t
    for white privilege, most whites would not have been able to attain
    the wealth they enjoy today, which helps to keep our society racially
    divided with their communities enjoying unlimited prosperity and their
    being able to pass on this privilege to the next generation. Please
    don’t start commenting about American problems when you are so uninformed
    about Brazilian problems!

     

    14.
    "…not a few whites claimed to be blacks in the last UERJ vestibular/one-drop
    rule"

    That
    may be true, but if entrance were to be judged according to birth certificate
    racial classification and according to those who actually see the applicants,
    this problem could actually be solved. Again, I am not saying that quotas
    are the answers to the low attendance of black Brazilians in colleges
    and universities, but if its going to work certain guidelines must be
    followed.

    Socially,
    a person who is half black, but clearly has a European phenotype, like
    blonde dancer Carla Perez, in my view would not suffer from racial discrimination
    as a person who looks like actress Adriana Lessa would. In my view,
    the infamous one-drop rule is ridiculous. I remember having a
    white college professor who had a black grandfather although you would
    never know it from his appearance.

    The
    one-drop rule would obviously not work in a country such as Brazil
    where race-mixing has been going for so long. In many ways, physical
    appearance matters more in Brazil but as I stated in my essay "Where
    Did All the Blacks Go?", Brazilians will occasionally disqualify
    someone from being white if they knew that there were pretos
    in that person’s family. Also from that article, I stated that while:

    "Brazil
    never legally adopted the infamous "one drop" of black blood
    rule as in the US, in the book Negroes in Brazil, author
    Donald Pierson discovered a popular saying in Brazil that said "quem
    escapa de branco, negro é" ("who can’t be a white
    man is a negro")."

     

    15.
    "Absurd laws are created under the pretext of fighting racism,
    but they end up stimulating it. Today, in Brazil, if you insult a
    black person, you incur in a heinous crime, with firm arrest and no
    bail allowed. But if you kill a black person, the law is more lenient."

    Hmmm,
    this is interesting indeed! I’ll tell you what. Do some research and
    find some names of black Brazilians who have successfully sued white
    Brazilians for racism and won in a court of law. Afro-Brazilian journalist
    Joni Anderson wrote that when he had a feature column in a well-known
    São Paulo newspaper, his voicemail was constantly flooded by
    Afro-Brazilians who had experienced acts of racism everyday. How many
    of those people do you think had the financial means to take these complaints
    to a court of law?

    How
    many white Brazilians do you know (and can prove) have been actually
    thrown in jail for racist practices? Most likely NONE! And as far as
    murder, I can relay several stories I have been told in which a black
    Brazilian was killed and absolutely NOTHING was done about it!
    There is a well known story from 1996 about a 19-year old black kid
    named Luciano Soares Ribeiro who was run over while riding his bicycle
    by a white man driving a BMW who assumed that he had stolen the bike.
    The driver left Ribeiro laying in the street and when he was finally
    rushed to hospital, he died from his injuries. The boy had his bicycle
    receipt in his pocket. Do you know where this incident happened? In
    your beloved Porto Alegre!

    Sure
    a law may exist against racial discrimination but that law is null and
    void if it is not enforced or the people don’t have access to fair legal
    representation. Thus, in this case, racism bred both violence and social
    inequality, with a life taken in the balance. This is a regular part
    of life if you happen to be black and Brazilian.

     

    16.
    "The history of Africa is the history of tribal warfare and slavery,
    stoning to death for adulterers, physical mutilation as punishment
    and sexual mutilation as custom. Democracy, human rights, freedom
    of the press and female emancipation are unknown institutions in that
    continent.

    That
    Africa may be a tender remembrance of an immemorial past, that’s all
    right. Today, though, it has no lesson to teach to the West. When Africans
    have free elections and democracy, the fundamentals of human rights,
    a press and freedom of the press, women with the same rights as men,
    and when clitoris are no longer mutilated nor women stoned to death,
    we can talk again."

    Now
    Mr. Cristaldo wants to share his biased opinions about Africa and explain
    why African history and culture should not be taught in Brazilian schools
    in order to increase the self-esteem of Afro-Brazilian children while
    improving Brazil’s overall awareness of Africa’s rich history and contribution
    to Brazil’s national identity. History, Mr. Cristaldo, can be told in
    many ways. There is an old African proverb that basically says that
    it is the victor who writes history from his perspective.

    History’s
    Two Sides

    Napoleon
    Bonaparte once asked "What is history but a fable agreed upon?"

    As
    a child attending a Catholic school I once idolized the legendary American
    President Abraham Lincoln. I didn’t learn until years later that in
    reference to the issue of race in America, Mr. Lincoln once said "I,
    as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position
    assigned to the white race." This reminded me of a line American
    rapper Ice Cube once said: "I’m sitting in history learning `bout
    a sucka who didn’t give a f**k about me!"

    History
    must reveal its positive side as well as its negative side and then
    as the children get older they can do even more research and discover
    more truth. How dare you speak of African tribal warfare without speaking
    of Adolph Hitler’s massacre of 6 million people or without speaking
    of King Leopold of Belgium exterminating 10 million people in the Congo
    in the late 19th and early 20th centuries! Let’s talk of how there were
    more than 20 million Natives in the Americas before the arrival of the
    European. Today, after mass European aggression and domination, there
    are probably around 2 million Natives between America and Brazil, the
    two largest countries of the Americas.

    Let’s
    talk about how the Germans exterminated 80 percent of the Herero tribe
    in Namibia in seven years from 1904-1911. Let’s speak of how the French
    and British brought South African woman Saartje Baartman, aka the "Venus
    Hottentott", to Paris and London to parade her body in sideshows
    like a zoo animal because of the size of her huge buttocks! They later
    preserved her genitals and brain and placed them on display at a Parisian
    museum until the 1970s. The body was only returned to South African
    last year!

    Let’s
    speak about the incredible atrocities provoked by the Portuguese in
    Africa! Let’s speak about the millions who have been killed in the European
    spread of Christianity! You want to speak of tribal warfare? Well throughout
    European history you find England vs. France, Spain vs. Portugal, Italy
    vs. Greece, Christians vs. Protestants and too many other invasions,
    wars and episodes of mass extermination to speak of here.

    You
    speak of physical mutilation? Do you know how women were treated
    and viewed during the spread of Christianity? Do the research! On the
    other hand, there have been many African civilizations that were matriarchal
    societies with the children of unions taking their mother’s name and
    tracing their ancestry through the mother’s family line. Sexual mutilation?
    There is still a debate as to whether female circumcision was a purely
    African custom or whether the Arabs introduced it into Africa.

    Africans
    have killed each other, but where did they get the weapons to do so?
    Similar to the way the CIA dumped guns and drugs in African-American
    ghettos, Europeans have been giving Africans weapons for centuries also!
    Angola, for example, was stuck in a Cold War tug of war between America
    and South Africa on the one side and Cuba and Russia on the other. The
    result? African casualties!

    Shall
    I even mention the 1976 Soweto riots in which the South African police
    opened fire and killed hundreds of defenseless black children for the
    crime of protesting against European domination and racism? We cannot
    truly know the history of African people until we separate it from centuries
    of European or Arab domination. Europe or European dominated countries
    are no place to start if we want to teach children about the value of
    human life!

    What
    Democracy?

    You
    say, "Democracy, human rights, freedom of the press and female
    emancipation are unknown institutions in that continent."

    If
    you know anything about Western countries, you know that America and
    particularly Brazil have incredible ideals of machismo! Countless studies
    have shown how Brazilian men have regularly killed Brazilian women who
    were suspected of infidelity while it was accepted norm among men. Democracy
    and human rights? Brazil’s record or human rights atrocities are horrible!
    The mass murder of black people and street children as well as modern
    day slavery in parts of Brazil have been well documented! Where have
    YOU been living? Have you read any past issues of this magazine?

    Have
    you read about the landless movements? Have you read the stat saying
    that less than 20 percent of the Brazilian population owns more than
    80 percent of the land? How can you even speak of democracies when Brazil
    has endured two military dictatorships in the 20th century and an "apartheid-era
    South Africa" type government that is still in power in Bahia?
    Have you read about the horrible methods of torture and numbers of people
    who disappeared during the 1964-1985 dictatorship? Have you read about
    the mass prison exterminations? Are you sure you are Brazilian? You
    could have fooled me!

    You
    speak of free elections? Are you aware of the stolen elections of John
    Kennedy and George W.? Apparently not. Political corruption is a worldwide
    thing, not just African. And as far as democracy is concerned, former
    Brazilian president Fernando Henrique Cardoso himself has said that
    Brazilians are only now beginning to learn what democracy really is.

    Freedom
    of press? Only to a limited degree. Whenever people raise their voice
    against the government, they are oppressed or shut down. Why do you
    think Martin Luther King, Jr. was REALLY killed? Why were the Black
    Panthers really infiltrated and broken apart? Why did so many people
    die during the Brazilian dictatorship of ’64-85? Why have so many Brazilian
    politicians been killed in the past 10 years? Why were protestors against
    the WTO, IMF and World Bank repressed in Seattle a few years ago? Why
    have the (music group) Dixie Chicks been banned from American radio?

     

    17.
    "That Africa may be a tender remembrance of an immemorial past,
    that’s all right. Today, though, it has no lesson to teach to the
    West."

    Whether
    you know it or not, the Egyptian influence on Western society is incredible!
    Need a small reminder? Ever seen the back of an American Dollar Bill?
    It has Egyptian symbolism all over it! Without the contributions of
    ancient Egyptians, many of today’s technological advances would not
    have been possible! That is PRE-ARABIC EGYPT! You don’t read
    much history do you?

    There
    are two main points to recognize here:

    1)
    History has recorded that the European has been the perpetrator of the
    greatest and most horrific crimes against humanity! Ever heard of Vietnam?
    How about the Spanish Inquisition? The Atlantic Slave Trade? World Wars
    I and II? That’s just the tip of the iceberg! Want current proof? Ever
    heard of Iraq?

    If
    you are going to tell the history of the African and highlight the negative,
    you would spend 20 times more time highlighting that of the European!

     

    18.
    "It wouldn’t be likely for Portugal, a good Christian country,
    to fail to perpetuate biblical tradition"

    A good
    Christian country? Again, are you aware of the Portuguese human rights
    atrocities in colonial era Africa? How about the Estado Novo military
    dictatorship that was as brutal as that of Brazil’s? How about the recent
    hate crimes against recent African immigrants? Let’s get out of fantasy
    and recognize reality!

     

    19.
    "From Dhakar, one reader sends me references about Cheikh Anta
    Diop, a Senegalese man of letters who defends the idea that ancient
    Egypt is part of black Africa. It may be. But such a thesis is far
    from constituting unanimity among historians. Even if it were so,
    the argument is worthless. If a hypothetically black Egypt ever had
    a glorious trajectory, it is over now. The trajectory was interrupted
    somewhere along the way and today Egypt lives the hour of Islam—nothing
    glorious there. Besides everything else, ancient Egypt was slavocrat—just
    ask the Hebrews!—and this doesn’t help the argument in favor
    of Africa either."

    Hmmm,
    let me see…First of all, Egypt IS in Africa, right? Second, before
    the Arab invasion of the 8th century, what color do YOU think the Egyptians
    were? Roman and Greek writers of ancient times described them as being
    black. The Egyptian population of today, like that of America and Brazil
    of today, is not of the same racial composition that it was before subsequent
    foreign invasions. The facial characteristics of the vast majority of
    Egyptian statues look like the people whom we would call black today.

    Years
    before he died, Cheikh Anta Diop participated in a UN meeting
    of the world’s most respected Egyptologists to determine, among other
    things, the racial identity of the ancient Egyptians. With skin fold
    deposits that he extracted from mummies, Diop proved that the melanin
    content in these mummies could have only been people classified by today’s
    terms as black. When asked for rebuttals, none of the other Egyptologists
    could refute this evidence. Why is it so hard for so many people to
    fathom that the ancient Egyptians could have been black? Thoughts like
    these are inherently racist in themselves!

    Rewriting
    History

    Also,
    unanimity among historians does not prove fact or fiction. Political
    agendas are often times behind the recording of history. For example,
    in 1916, a well respected archaeologist named James Henry Breasted described
    the ancient Egyptians in a high school textbook as a race of "brown-skinned
    men…with dark hair". But after receiving valuable financial assistance
    from people such as John Rockefeller (who granted him $1.5 million),
    among others, in order to further his studies of the ancient world,
    his revised book referred to these same peoples as "members of
    a great race of white men".

    One
    notices between the two books, the great lengths that Breasted took
    to suddenly disassociate Egypt from black Africa. Why? It’s simple.
    In order to secure Rockefeller’s generous donation, he had to change
    the racial classification of the ancient Egyptians. A financial reward
    in exchange for an alteration that benefits someone else. I know, that’s
    IMPOSSIBLE, right?

    Black
    historians and anthropologists have been recording history for many
    years although their work is often disregarded by the white academic
    establishment. But upon closer examination, the establishment must come
    to terms with the discoveries of these great men. Its not about raising
    the position of black people in history while lowering that of white
    people. It’s about learning truth.

    My
    question is, if more and more discoveries confirm the contributions
    of African descent people in world history, will non-black people be
    able to accept these facts? If they cannot, they must come to terms
    with their own biased attitudes! The Lemba people of southern Africa
    have for centuries claimed that they were Jews. The establishment refused
    to believe them. After DNA tests were taken, the claims of the Lemba
    people proved that they were indeed Jews.

    Black
    scholars and historians have long claimed that Africans arrived in the
    Americas long before the European, but again, the establishment disregarded
    them. Well, in 1975, Brazilian archaeologists discovered the oldest
    known fossil found to date in the country. They called her "Luzia"
    and when they reconstructed her face they determined that the woman
    had all of the physical characteristics of an African.

     

    20.
    "For the time being, I repeat, Africa leans more towards Idi
    Amin Dada than towards Mozart."

    Idi
    Amin was definitely a cruel tyrant. But in a world economic system driven
    by greed and domination even the most honest people become devious.
    Before you start pulling people like Idi Amin out of Africa’s history,
    you need to look into the crimes of Cecil Rhodes and King Leopold in
    Africa. They were definitely more Hitler than they were Desmond Tutu.
    I won’t even start on the corruption of Brazilian politicians! That’s
    another 100 page paper! But I will mention a state deputy of São
    Paulo named Afanásio Jazadji who stated on his popular radio
    program his total agreement with the assassinations of Brazil’s street
    children!

    Clean
    your own house before you start judging someone else’s!

    African
    descent people have had to view the world from the European perspective
    for many centuries. If the tables were turned in the opposite direction,
    could peoples of primarily European descent view the world from an African
    perspective? I cannot answer this question for you. This is a question
    that people must ponder for themselves. One can succeed in fooling someone
    else but can that person fool themselves? I read Mr. Cristaldo’s own
    comments that "some form of racism we all have, or we would not
    be human" and then I read on as he attempted to deny the most overt
    and covert forms of racism that has existed since the Portuguese arrived
    in Africa in the late 15th century and later on with the colonization
    of Brazil.

    I’m
    sure that there are some of you who are reading this piece who will
    continue to deny the influence of race in the daily lives of millions
    of people of African and Native descent in our world. But my question
    to you is, if your phenotype does not prominently display your African
    ancestry and you haven’t done any research about how race factors into
    one’s chances of living a prosperous, healthy life, how can you continue
    to deny the existence of something that you know nothing about?

    I also
    wish to affirm that I DO NOT view all people as racists! To the contrary,
    I have met many people who look nothing like me whom I am convinced
    have not a trace of racist tendencies in their bodies. But I am also
    aware of the famous Brazilian (and American, for that matter) "prejudice
    against being prejudiced". The question is this: If you as a man
    or woman, black, white or other, Christian or Muslim, knew for a
    fact
    that you received benefits that others didn’t receive simply
    because of your race, sex or religious beliefs, would you stand up and
    denounce these inequalities or would you keep your mouth shut and enjoy
    the benefits?

    In
    an unequal society, I really couldn’t blame you if you DID take advantage
    of these unearned benefits, all I ask is that you can at least acknowledge
    it! Maybe then one day you WILL be ready to denounce it. Let’s face
    facts about the true society that we live in, people. As powerful, rich
    countries continue to exploit the poorer nations and disastrous levels
    of poverty continue to affect the lives of the world’s majority of people,
    something as openly obvious as the existence of racism should not deter
    us from seeing the entire picture which is more important: WE ARE ALL
    PEOPLE WHO DESERVE TO BE TREATED AS PEOPLE.

    With
    the wealth of resources available on this planet, there is no excuse
    for the way that some of us are forced to live. The rich minority who
    control who eats and who doesn’t continues to exploit these divisions
    among us, the people of the majority. They have placed obstacles such
    as racism, sexism and inequality before us and watched as these practices
    keep us arguing amongst ourselves as we fight amongst ourselves for
    the leftover resources that the rich haven’t already claimed.

    It
    is obvious that Mr. Cristaldo is another believer of these fabrications
    that our so-called leaders have formulated while they continue to reap
    the benefits that they create. In conclusion, I hope that the bulk of
    this paper gives a clearer view of the ways that racism continues to
    function in our society. Feel free to write to me with your comments,
    but before you start flooding my e-mail box with reactionary responses,
    please do some research on your own. You just might start to understand
    what I’m talking about!

     

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Futebol:
    The Brazilian Way of Life, by Alex Bellos

    Nile
    Valley Contributions to Civilization by Anthony Browder

    Neither
    Black nor White: Slavery and Race Relations in Brazil and the United
    States by Carl Degler

    The
    Mystery of Samba : Popular Music and National Identity in Brazil
    by Hermano Vianna

    Tropical
    Multiculturalism: A Comparative History of Race in Brazilian Cinema
    and Culture by Robert Stam

    Racial
    Politics in Contemporary Brazil by Michael Hanchard

    Bossa
    Nova: The Story of the Brazilian Music That Seduced the World
    by Ruy Castro

    Racism
    in a Racial Democracy: The Maintenance of White Supremacy in Brazil
    by France Winddance Twine

    "How
    the Germans Got the Land", New African. March 2003, pgs.42-47.

    "Pale
    Perfection: White Women in Pursuit of an Aryan Ideal", M. Wilson.
    [online] http://condor.depaul.edu/~mwilson/multicult/white.html
    . (available) April 6, 2003.

    "O
    fim do mito", Carla Gullo Rita Moraes. Isto É.
    [online] http://www.terra.com.br/istoe/capa/140506.htm 
    (available) April 6, 2003.

    "Brazil
    Grappling With Racism". Peter Muello. Department of English,
    University of California. [online] http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/docs/muello1.html 
    (available) April 6, 2003.

    "Bola
    discrimina negros, afirma estudo". Folha On line. [online]
    http://www.sapesp.com.br/noticias/outubro/racismo.html 
    (available) April 5, 2003

    "Luzia
    – A Primeira Brasileira". Veja. [online] http://veja.abril.com.br/250899/p_009.html.
    (available) April 6, 2003.

    Konopothanatus
    brasiliensis. [online] http://www.inventabrasil.hpg.ig.com.br/jblacer.htm 
    (available) April 3, 2003.

    DJ
    Cliffy Presents Black Rio Brazil Soul Power 1971-1980 (compact disc).
    STRUT CD/LP 015

     

    Mark
    Wells is an Anthropology major at the University of Michigan and
    has a deep interest in Brazil and the African Diaspora. He can be
    reached at: Quilombhoje72@yahoo.com

     

     

    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    LETTERS

    For long considered a patrimony of Brazilian music, Francisco Buarque de Hollanda, better known ...

    One of the ambulances sold by the Ambulances Mafia in Brazil

    Ambulances, Prostitutes, Kickbacks… Here Comes the Latest Brazilian Scandal

    The latest affair to rock the Brazilian republic, involving more than 100 congressmen charged ...

    O Rio! ("A Sweet Lightheartedness")

    Brazilians’ black and white and brown bodies interlock in volleyball games, in wrestling, in ...

    37 Countries Discuss in Brazil Terror and Mafia

    Representatives of Customs Departments of 37 countries of the Americas and Caribe will discuss ...

    Brazil and Mercosur Snub the US and Back Venezuela for UN Seat

    Mercosur full members expressed on Friday, July 21, support for Venezuela to occupy the ...

    Veja magazine cover

    Brazilian President Wants to Jail Journalists Who Use Wiretaps

    The IAPA (Inter American Press Association) is voicing concern at a bill introduced to ...

    Some Lessons from Brazil to Fight World Poverty

    Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva announced that, during his visit to New ...

    Brazil Fears High Interest Rates Only Won’t Halt Inflation

    Latin American markets were mixed to higher today, as Mexico and Argentina benefited from ...

    FIFA and the World Cup

    Delays, Deaths and Preparations on FIFA’s Agenda for Brazil’s World Cup

    All the trouble involving Brazil’s 2014 World Cup preparations and concerns about human rights ...

    COVER STORY

    Nevermore? Eleven years after Brazil’s military handed power back to civilians and returned to ...