Fooling the British, the Brazilian Way

    Fooling the British, the Brazilian 
Way

    While the British wanted
    slavery abolished in Brazil, Brazilians
    with an economy dominated by sugar, depended on slave
    labour. Brazilians knew, however, they would not be left alone
    if they didn’t do something. So was born the image of seeming
    to do something while not doing very much at all.
    by: Guy
    Burton

    Brazzil
Picture

    I’ve been writing my blog for a month now. I had originally set it both to
    chronicle my activities as a candidate ahead of the London elections in June
    and to explore subjects about Brazil. But I’ve also found it useful to pontificate
    more generally; essentially it’s my little corner of the World Wide Web which
    is my soap box—and mine alone.

    I racked my brains, trying
    to think of a title. I thought about what I was writing: it would be general
    stuff; thoughts and observations about life, politics and society; maybe even
    a book review or two. Window dressing, in other words. But `Window dressing
    for the soul’ didn’t have quite the right ring to it; in fact it seemed rather
    pretentious.

    As I thought about what
    I might call it, I was copied into an email from a reader who had forwarded
    my article on military service in Brazil from a couple of months ago to his
    friends. "Do you have to do this?" he asked them, several of whom
    were like me: British, but with Brazilian passports.

    "He’s exaggerating,"
    was one of the responses. "It used to be like that, but not anymore.
    Had he got hold of a particular form when he turned 18 he would have been
    spared the annual trip to the consulate. He’s stirring, trying to make an
    impression: para inglês ver."

    Para inglês ver.
    I thought about it. Yes, it had a ring to it. I liked its sound and what it
    hinted at. Making an impression; stirring. Yes, that would do. And given what
    I wanted to write about would involve observations about Brazilian politics,
    culture and society, it would help. A few days later when it came to fill
    out the name on the heading of my blog, Para Ingles Ver it was.

    But what does it mean?
    Well, it’s originally Brazilian and literally means `for the English to see’.
    At its most basic it is used to describe when something should be done—and
    to all intents and purposes on the surface it is—while underneath nothing
    happens, nothing changes. In the case above, my readers believed I was making
    a big song and dance about military service in Brazil when the reality today
    is that few people do it.

    Where did this expression
    come from? For that you have to cast your mind back to nearly 200 years ago,
    when Brazil first became independent. Unlike the other South American countries
    where liberty came at the cost of blood and war, Brazil’s experience was relatively
    more peaceful.

    The Portuguese king, João
    VI, had returned to his homeland after a decade spent in exile from Napoleon
    Bonaparte’s forces in Rio de Janeiro. He left his son, Pedro. But tensions
    grew between the colonial power and its colony, resulting in Pedro’s cry of
    independence in 1822.

    At the birth of independent
    Brazil was the midwife: Britain. An ally of the Portuguese crown, it also
    saw commercial advantage in a free Brazil. But those benefits would only be
    achieved through peace and compromise between Portugal and Brazil. London
    therefore brought the two sides together to thrash out an agreement, including
    outstanding issues such as compensation to Portugal for the loss of its former
    colony.

    However, the negotiations
    took longer than expected; and there was irritation on both sides. By 1825,
    progress was going slower than expected and Britain decided to take charge
    of matters. An agreement was signed between the two in August, leaving the
    British diplomat, Sir Charles Stuart, to begin the next stage: drawing up
    a treaty between Britain and Brazil.

    Slavery

    At the time Britain was
    a world power, a leading commercial nation. Economically it was one of the
    most dynamic in Europe and was on the verge of the Industrial Revolution.
    Like all nations, it pressed for advantageous terms for itself, which included
    preferential trading rights and the abolition of the Brazilian slave trade.

    Unlike Brazil, Britain
    had already abolished slavery both at home and in its colonies. But to the
    United States—who also had a large slave population and an economy (mainly
    in the South) dependent on their labour—Britain’s moves were seen in
    a less than philanthropic light.

    Indeed, as one US minister
    at Rio repeatedly sent in his despatches to Washington during the 1840s, "the
    impelling irritation that disgusts Brazil with Great Britain, is her conduct
    in regard to the slave trade and slavery…

    "The scheme of self-interest
    attributed to Great Britain is her design of monopolizing or controlling the
    markets of colonial produce, and making the free labour of her own colonies
    in the East and West Indies the sole suppliers of these articles, to the destruction
    of Brazil, of Cuba, and the slave states of the United States…"

    But Brazil was weak, economically
    and militarily compared to Britain. So when in November 1826 the two countries
    finally reached an agreement, the treaty specified the slave trade as a form
    of piracy and gave the British the right to search ships flying the Brazilian
    flag for slaves.

    Despite Britain’s power,
    slaves continued to be shipped across the Atlantic from Africa, to arrive
    on Brazilian shores. The British government became convinced the Brazilians
    were not doing enough to stop the trade, which they had agreed to. As a result,
    in 1831, the authorities at Rio introduced an enactment, which laid out penalties
    for involvement in the trade.

    But despite the instigation
    of this new law, there was little political will in Brazil to enforce it;
    an alliance of planters, merchants and politicians saw to that. Between 1831
    and the late 1840s it is estimated that more than 700,000 slaves were illegally
    transferred into Brazil.

    In 1845, the provisions
    which gave British warships the right to search Brazilian ships came to an
    end. Understandably, the Brazilians saw no merit in renewing them. But they
    hadn’t counted on British public opinion, which had developed into a missionary
    zeal to bring an end to the slave trade and ultimately slavery itself. And
    the response was not long in coming.

    In February of that year,
    the US minister in Brazil wrote to his Secretary of State that the former
    American consul in Rio, Mr Slacum, had been invited by a British diplomat,
    Mr Samo, to read some correspondence which had come from London:

    "Mr Slacum found
    in a late letter… a most significant remark to this effect:- `The Govt
    of H.M. is now fully convinced of the bad faith of the Impl Govt in respect
    to its treaty obligations upon the African slave-trade, and is determined
    to fulfil the terms and stipulations of the treaty with Brazil for its suppression,
    independently by its own means and in its own way.’

    …Mr Slacum was struck
    by the sentence, and, reading it aloud in the hearing of Mr Samo, that gentlemen,
    as if about to reveal something and suddenly checking himself, said:- `Will
    you be here in April?’ `Why?’ said Mr Slacum. `If you are here then, you
    will see some fun.’"

    The `fun’ to which the
    diplomat referred was the application of what became known as the Aberdeen
    Act. The Royal Navy began boarding Brazilian ships in search of illegal slaves
    and treated them as if they were pirates. Indeed, given the unilateral approach
    of the British and the lack of an agreement with the Brazilians, the burden
    of proof was pitched much lower—but still the trade continued.

    The problem persisted
    because despite the lack of political will to deal with the trade, Brazilian
    politics was in a state of chaos. Four Liberal governments followed each other
    in quick succession between 1844 and 1848, all troubled by factional splits
    within.

    Eventually in May 1848,
    as news of the revolutions which were sweeping across Europe arrived in Rio,
    a new head of government was announced: Francisco de Paula Sousa e Melo.

    Riots and Chaos

    The main priority of the
    new administration was to bring to an end the tension with the British. That
    could only be done by tackling the slave trade. A bill was passed which repealed
    the 1831 law which had made the slave trade illegal.

    But it also meant that
    retrospective action could be taken against those traders since that date.
    The result was uproar and anger, resulting in riots and the collapse of public
    order. The government quickly decided to shelve its planned law and resigned.

    From London this seemed
    to be the final straw: the Brazilians couldn’t be trusted to effectively halt
    the slave trade. British warships stepped up their activity, but it didn’t
    seem to be delivering any results. Still the number of illegal slaves entering
    Brazil continued.

    As if matters couldn’t
    get any more extreme, in 1850 the British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston decided
    to step up efforts. No longer would the Royal Navy be limited to searching
    Brazilian vessels in international waters: from now on they would be free
    to pursue slave traders into Brazilian territorial waters, driving them onto
    the shore or dragging them out of port. On one occasion there was an exchange
    of fire between the HMS Cormorant and the military installations which guarded
    the coastal town of Paranaguá.

    Power in Brazil had by
    now transferred to the Conservatives, who recognised the extreme British measures
    showed up the military weakness of the Brazilians. Despite having close associations
    with the political alliance in favour of slavery and its trade, they realised
    Britain’s actions wouldn’t let up until something was done.

    A few months later the
    Brazilians waved the white flag of surrender by passing a law which maintained
    the previous provisions lain out in the 1831 bill, stating that the trade
    was illegal and giving the government greater powers to deal with it. Just
    over a year after this bill was put into effect even the British had to admit
    that the slave trade was now destroyed.

    Sugar and Slave
    Labour

    During this period of
    external pressure between 1826 and 1852, the Brazilians were seen by the British
    as unwilling participants on the matter of abolition. They became increasingly
    exasperated by the failure of successive governments to stop the trade, even
    though they recognised it was illegal.

    For the Brazilians though,
    there was a lack of enthusiasm: the nature of the economy, dominated as it
    was by sugar, depended to a great degree on slave labour. Halting the trade
    would dry up the supply of that labour, not least because of the low life
    expectancy of slaves.

    However, they recognised
    they would not be left alone by the British if they didn’t appear to be doing
    something. And so was born the image of acting, of seeming to do something
    about the slave trade, while not doing very much at all. These new laws will
    stop the trade, Brazilians would tell the British, while saying to each other,
    para inglês ver: it’s only for the English to see and believe
    we’re doing something.

    By the 1850s the trade
    was stopped. But still the practice of slavery continued. For the next thirty
    years the matter would rise up the political agenda. As Brazil developed economically,
    the importance of slave labour became weaker. The economic pole shifted from
    the sugar fields of Bahia and the north to the coffee plantations in São
    Paulo and the south.

    Rather than slaves, European
    immigrants were seen as a better source of labour; industrialisation and urbanisation
    slowly broke down the consensus. Several efforts were made to abolish slavery,
    but they floundered: questions of compensation to the former owners and the
    prospect of a gradual emancipation over a generation created heat and tension
    between slavery’s proponents and abolitionists. One after another a bill was
    proposed or floated, only to collapse. Para inglês ver, thought
    many abolitionists: there’s no will or commitment to bring it to an end.

    When it did come it was
    different to the previous attempts. There was no gradual process proposed,
    no conditions attached. In May 1888 the Princess Regent, Dona Isabel, who
    was acting for her father the Emperor away in Europe at the time, finally
    signed the law which would bring an end to slavery. And it wasn’t only para
    inglês ver.


    Guy Burton was born in Brazil and now lives in London where he is a candidate
    for the Liberal Democrats in the London elections next month. He began in
    blog in March as a way of recounting his campaign experiences and to explore
    various subjects he’s interested in. It can be found at http://guyburton.blogspot.com
    and he can be contacted at gjsburton@hotmail.com

    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Brazil Gets 633,000 New Jobs in One Year

    Brazilian government statistical bureau (IBGE) reports that over the last twelve months a total ...

    Prowling in Rio

    Those women dressed in tight clothes are now sambaing, vigorously. The whole place has ...

    A chicken ranch in Brazil

    Despite Sales Increase Brazil’s Chicken Exporters Are Losing Money

    Brazilian chicken exports yielded US$ 2.145 billion in the first half of this year, ...

    Dialogue Is Dead, Say Brazilian Indians

    Sluggish, aligned with contrary interests, and marked by inaction. These were some of the ...

    Tradings of Brazil

    Trading Companies Finally Get Some Respect in Brazil

    Trading companies from Brazil posted revenues of US$ 20.7 billion from exports last year. ...

    IDB Has Money for Brazil and Neighbors to Fund Joint Projects

    The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) has opened institutions to finance projects aimed at finding ...

    Damascus Fair Draws Brazil’s Small Businesses Attention

    São José do Rio Preto, city in the interior of the Brazilian southeastern state ...

    Brazil Says FTAA Talks Are Still On

    The creation of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) depends on negotiations ...

    Brazil-Venezula Oil Venture Will Add 200,000 Barrels a Day and 230,000 Jobs

    The decision by Petrobras to join Venezuela’s state-run petroleum company, PDVSA, in building a ...