The Making of Lula of Brazil

Making of Lula of Brazil

    new book on Lula explores the Brazilian President’s private
    and emotional life in detail and even draws explicitly on
    psychoanalytic concepts to probe his unconscious mind. Lula’s
    saga is Brazil’s version of a Horatio Alger story. He channeled
    his anger into a struggle to do better than his father.
    Ted Goertzel

    Lula: o filho
    do Brasil (Lula: Brazil’s Son) by Denise Paraná. São
    Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2002.

    Brazilians are not
    accustomed to books that reveal intimate details of the lives of their
    political leaders. This is too bad because Brazilian political history
    is full of colorful personalities and dramatic events that cry out for
    psychological interpretation. Luis Carlos Prestes’ quixotic march into
    the jungle at the head of a column of Communist revolutionaries inspired
    a generation of would-be revolutionaries, but no psychobiographer has
    probed his martyr complex.

    Nor have depth psychologists
    dissected Jânio Quadros’ surprise resignation from the Presidency
    in 1961 or the bizarre family conflicts that sabotaged the Collor de Mello
    administration in the early 1990s. Although he is a psychiatrist, Eduardo
    Mascarenhas managed to write 125 pages about former President Getúlio
    Vargas without analyzing his personality or exploring the reasons for
    his suicide.

    Denise Paraná’s
    study of Brazil’s new President, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, may
    shatter the Brazilian proscription against serious biographical inquiry.
    Written originally as a doctoral dissertation at the University of São
    Paulo, it had modest impact when it was first published by Xamã
    in 1996. But Lula has been elected president and a new edition is prominently
    displayed in all the bookstores.

    In it, Paraná
    explores Lula’s private and emotional life in detail and even draws explicitly
    on psychoanalytic concepts to probe his unconscious mind. Paraná
    is well prepared for the task, having done post-graduate study at Cambridge
    University in England after her doctoral work in Brazil. She draws widely
    on American and European psychological and anthropological theories.

    Lula: Brazil’s
    Son is modeled on Oscar Lewis’s classic The Children of Sanchez:
    Autobiography of a Mexican Family. It could have been titled Dona
    Lindu’s Children: Autobiography of a Brazilian Family. It qualifies
    as autobiography because much of the book consists of transcriptions of
    interviews with Lula and several of his siblings. The leading figure in
    the family is Dona Lindu, Lula’s mother, not his father, who abandoned
    the family soon after Lula was born. Denise Paraná conducted extensive
    interviews in early 1990s, and Lula and his family were very cooperative
    because Paraná had served as an advisor in Lula’s political campaigns.

    Oscar Lewis’s concept
    of the culture of poverty has been criticized by American scholars for
    "blaming the victim," but Paraná found that it fit the
    Silva family well. The Silvas lived in terrible poverty in the Brazilian
    northeast, buying rice only when they were too sick to digest manioc flour,
    walking to the river to wash their clothes, having no shoes, electricity
    or household appliances other than a wood stove. Lula’s father had eight
    children with his mother, then ran off to São Paulo to start another
    large family with his wife’s cousin.

    The Brazilian poor
    know that Lula understands them because he was one of them. They are inspired
    by the fact that he overcame terrible obstacles to become the leader of
    the nation. Although Lula is the leader of a leftist party that focuses
    on the social forces that oppress the poor, his life story is that of
    a self-made man who rose above poverty through individual initiative.
    His saga is Brazil’s version of a Horatio Alger story.


    This tension between
    individual achievement and social change is an important theme of Denise
    Paraná’s remarkable book. To solve it, she develops the concept
    of the culture of transformation as the alternative to the culture
    of poverty. The culture of poverty is characterized by fatalism and
    hopelessness, by a focus on immediate gratification instead of on plans
    for the future, by a profound feeling of alienation from society. Growing
    up impoverished in the northeast, Lula’s family experienced all of these
    feelings. But they were able to transform their alienation into a struggle
    for personal improvement and social change. That is what makes Lula’s
    presidency so inspiring.

    Lula’s escape from
    poverty began when his mother made a courageous decision to sell her meager
    belongings, load her children on the back of a truck, and move from the
    impoverished northeast to the southern state of São Paulo. The
    13 day journey was an adventure for Lula and the other children, but a
    daring plunge into the unknown for a mother with limited education and
    almost no resources. Lula’s father was already is São Paulo, but
    she knew he was living with her cousin and a new family. Working as a
    longshoreman, he had barely enough income to help both families. All of
    the children had to work.

    São Paulo beckoned
    because Brazilian capitalism was booming there and workers could get much
    higher wages than in the northeast. By working very hard, Lula could afford
    to go to school and get trained as a lathe mechanic. This got him skilled
    jobs in the auto industry, an industry that had been built by multinational
    corporations. Skilled labor was scarce, and the multinationals preferred
    to negotiate with the labor unions rather than asking the military government
    to repress their own workers. Lula succeeded as a labor leader because
    he put aside leftist ideology, which he knew well from an older brother
    who was a Communist Party militant. Instead, Lula focused on bread-and-butter
    unionism, an approach that the establishment in São Paulo was willing
    to accept.

    The growth of Brazilian
    capitalism gave Lula the opportunity to break from the culture of poverty.
    But how did he get the psychological strength? Here is where Denise Paraná
    turns to psychoanalytical theory. She does so apologetically, repeatedly
    warning the reader that her psychohistorical speculations are just hypotheses
    that cannot be proven. This may be true, but no more so than any other
    psychohistorical analyses. Indeed, hers are better grounded than many
    because of her extensive interviews with Lula and his family. Often different
    family members tell the same stories, but with variations in emphasis
    and interpretation that provide insight into their psychological meaning.

    When Lula was five,
    his father returned to the northeast for a brief reconciliation with his
    mother, a visit that left her pregnant once again. Lula and his brothers
    remember an incident when the father was beating one of Lula’s older brothers,
    as he frequently did. He then started to beat Lula, the baby of the family,
    but Lula’s mother intervened to protect him. Shortly thereafter, his mother
    moved out taking the children with her. This greatly aggravated the father
    who stalked the neighborhood around the new house.

    In Lula’s recollection,
    his mother left in order to protect him. He felt that he was the most
    favored, most loved of his mother’s children, if only because he was the
    smallest. From a Freudian perspective, Paraná observes, he triumphed
    in the Oedipal struggle with his father for his mother’s love. This, she
    observes, might account for the remarkable self-esteem that enabled him
    to triumph over the culture of poverty.

    This may be true in
    Lula’s case, although there are certainly other and better ways for a
    boy to develop self-esteem. At least the story serves to reassure mothers
    that their boys may do well even if it is necessary to leave an abusive
    father. Perhaps more interesting are Paraná’s observations about
    Lula’s ways of coping with the situation. He denies having any anger or
    resentment against his father for mistreating him or his siblings or for
    abandoning the family. Paraná is understandably skeptical, how
    could a boy not resent such treatment? Lula concedes he is angry at his
    father, but for his ignorance, not for his treatment of the family. His
    father’s illiteracy was his Achilles Heel. He bought a newspaper every
    day to "read" on the way to work, sometimes attracting attention
    by holding it upside down.

    Lula channeled his
    anger into a struggle to do better than his father. He resolved never
    to fall into the "well of ignorance" that his father represented.
    He admired his father for his physical strength, his sexual prowess, and
    his ability to earn enough to support two families and various girlfriends
    (albeit inadequately). Challenging his father in these areas would have
    been difficult, and disloyal to his mother. So Lula threw himself into
    studying, something that his father had always opposed.

    His father insisted
    that all his children work as early and as much as possible. He apparently
    feared that his authority would be undermined if his children learned
    to read while he could not. He also humiliated Lula and his siblings,
    in comparison to his other children. In an anecdote that several mention,
    he refused to buy them ice cream when he bought it for their half-siblings
    because, he said, they didn’t know how to lick it.

    Lula channeled his
    rage into a drive to prove himself more successful than his father in
    the area where his father was weakest: education. Paraná conjectures
    that denying that he was angry at his father, other than for his ignorance,
    was part an important part of this process.

    Idealized Past

    Another use of denial,
    she observes, was common among emigrants from the northeast. Instead of
    complaining about the conditions they left, and giving thanks for their
    new opportunities, they idealized the past. They remembered the positive
    values of life in the rural northeast, minimizing the hardships. This
    idealization, Paraná observes, helped them be more assertive in
    demanding better wages and working conditions in São Paulo. They
    were not mere supplicants grateful for the crumbs offered them, they were
    proud sons and daughters of the northeast who had sacrificed much to help
    build a new Brazil.

    Although Paraná
    does not make this point, it can be argued that Lula’s use of socialist
    ideology is a similar idealization. Because they are socialists, he and
    his supporters are not mere supplicants seeking a larger slice of the
    capitalist pie. No, they are partisans of a much purer, more noble ideal.
    Theirs is a vision of a world where human need, not capitalist greed,
    reigns supreme. This vision has important psychological functions, it
    raises the self esteem of its adherents and gives meaning to their suffering.
    But it has absolutely nothing to do with the real world economic policies
    that they advocate.

    This psychological
    use of ideology may explain the odd ideological composition of the coalition
    that elected Lula president. His supporters included not only his own
    Workers Party (itself a coalition of conflicting ideological tendencies),
    but also the Liberal Party and one of Brazil’s Communist Parties. His
    vice presidential running mate was a Liberal.

    Brazilians use the
    term "liberal" in its classic European sense, as a belief in
    free markets, not in its American sense. Therefore, if ideologies were
    taken literally, Liberalism (free markets) and Communism (command economics)
    would be opposites and could never be on the same ticket. But this doesn’t
    matter if everyone (except a few true believers) realizes that they are
    idealizations not to be taken at face value.

    Oddly, in Brazil,
    "neoliberalism" is the whipping boy of the Left, but "liberalism"
    per se, without the "neo," is perfectly acceptable. Lula
    could never take a "neoliberal" running mate, but a "liberal"
    was just fine. The objection is not to liberal economic ideas, but to
    the alleged insensitivity of the "neoliberals" to the feelings
    and aspirations of the poor. As president, Lula’s economic and social
    policies are virtually indistinguishable from those of his predecessor,
    Fernando Henrique Cardoso.

    When Cardoso followed
    these policies Lula denounced them as "neoliberal," yet he feels
    no apparent embarrassment in adopting them as the core of his program
    to build a world without hunger or poverty. This socialist vision may
    help him build a stronger Brazilian capitalism, just as the vision of
    the idyllic northeast helped build a stronger urban industrial labor movement.

    If Lula’s leadership
    succeeds it will be more for who he is than for any new ideas or programs.
    His life is a just-so story of how a culture of poverty can be replaced
    with a culture of transformation. Anti-globalization rhetoric and socialist
    visions may play a useful psychological role in Brazil’s transition to
    mature capitalism, so long as they are kept quite separate from the actual
    economic policies.

    Ted Goertzel,
    Ph.D. is Professor of Sociology at Rutgers University in Camden, NJ.
    He is the author of a biography of Fernando Henrique Cardoso, available
    in English and in Portuguese. He can be contacted at
    and his WEB page can be found at


    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


    You May Also Like

    81% of Brazilian Industries Are Investing in R&D This Year

    Brazilian companies are expanding investment in innovation. This year, 81.2% of industries intend to ...

    Brazilian contractor group Odebrecht

    Brazil’s Big Contractors Looking for a Bigger Slice of Belo Monte’s Action

    A sweetheart deal? Maybe. After all, the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) will ante up ...

    José Serra

    Brazil Opposition’s Presidential Candidate Calls Mercosur Farce and Barrier

    José Serra, Brazil’s leading presidential candidate described Mercosur as a “farce” and a “barrier” ...

    Brazil and Ronaldinho from Big Hope to Big Flop

    Zinedine Zidane rediscovered his game in Germany, while Ronaldinho left his in Barcelona. Fans ...

    Reforestation Is a Growth Business in Brazil: 19% More in 2005

    Brazil is presently in seventh place in the world ranking of planted forests area. ...

    Brazil Gets an A for Scientific Information Access

    Representatives of Brazil, Spain, Portugal, Chile and the United States are meeting today in ...

    Production line in Brazil

    No Other Businessman Beats the Brazilian in Optimism

    To believe a survey conducted by international consultancy firm KPMG, Brazilian businessmen are the ...

    Sustainable Development Creator Scolds Brazil

    The author of the concept of sustainable development, Gro Harlem Brundtland, ex-prime minister of ...

    1 Million Linux- and Crank-Powered US$ 100 Laptops Coming to Brazil

    The US$ 100 laptop that is a brainchild of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ...

    Brazil Ends Law Compelling Parties to Have Same Allies at Federal and Local Levels

    Brazil’s House of Representatives approved, in a first vote, a proposed constitutional amendment that ...