Can God Save Rio?

     Can 
God Save Rio?

    Under
    a new restrained, conservative conception of democracy,
     religion has slid into the equation. Apart from Israel and the US,

    religion has also become the measure of accountability in the state
    of Rio de Janeiro. Rio’s state government is experimenting
    with its own version of the national security state.
    by:
    Norman Madarasz

    Security—public
    and national—is now the buzzword in democratic social policies throughout
    most of the world. After Israel, the United States through the Patriotic
    Acts has implemented the severest restrictions on civil liberties in decades,
    all in the name of national security. France, under the conservative governance
    of Nicolas Sarkozy, has rhymed the fears of a social slump with ethnic-related
    crimes. Muscovites crumble under the fear of the Chechen terrorist specter
    in retaliation for having had their homeland plundered to a pulp. And
    in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, public security beholds the hopes raised from
    years of inept and corrupt policing. Organized crime has exploded statewide,
    garnering comparisons to a Colombia in the making.

    As a policy obsession,
    `security’ is traditionally slotted on the right of the political spectrum.
    Israel, the US, France and Russia have all been under the governance of
    conservatives unprecedented in their belief that the use of force is a
    legitimate means to pre-empting terrorist attacks. At the same time, each
    country has used the same idea of force to curb dissent at home. Despite
    the banners and sound bites on protecting democracy, each of these countries
    has ever so subtly withdrawn the rights of the democratic opposition.
    Under this restrained, conservative conception of democracy, religion
    has slid into the equation. Apart from Israel and the US, to not have
    to speak of absolutist theocracies like Saudi Arabia, religion has also
    become the measure of accountability in the state of Rio de Janeiro.

    Little can express
    the indignation of the educated middle class Cariocas, Rio’s own
    citizens, as they face current events wreaking havoc in the state. Neither
    wealthy enough to shield themselves from armed assault in guarded houses
    and armored cars, nor poor enough to be tempted by the free for-all crime
    wave bleeding the city, the large educated middle class has had to bite
    the bullet of its powerlessness. In that regard, it differs little from
    middle classes worldwide who have boisterously watched political leadership
    betray them over Iraq. Most peculiar is that while Brazil as a whole is
    embarking on important reforms under the leadership of President Lula
    da Silva, Rio’s state government is experimenting with its own version
    of the national security state.

    The current tale is
    one of a state government that has all but lost its grip on power. Yet
    it is also one that only months ago embraced power in a landslide victory.
    No mere fiction, it is the inner lining of a governor’s dream, Mrs. Roseangela
    Matheus. Also known as `Rosinha’, she spent the first weeks of her term
    shielded behind sunglasses for tears flowed day into night over her subjects’
    refusal to recognize her as a born-again Evita. They stubbornly rejected
    her profession of faith to spread the word of God to those for whom only
    divinity is left as a hope for redemption. Meanwhile political corruption
    has run rampant at the highest level, stripping the state of the funds
    so urgently needed for security purposes, to say nothing of operating
    the civil service.

    The story is a pathetic
    one, too. Denial has reigned supreme regarding the "mysterious"
    disappearance of public funds, made accountable to the management of the
    former Vice-Governor—a black federal senator—Mrs Benedita da
    Silva. From April to December 2002, she served out the remaining months
    of the gubernatorial term after her boss, Rosinha’s husband, Anthony Garotinho,
    left the seat of government at the Palácio Guanabara to pursue
    his presidential ambitions.

    There is no Karl Rove
    in this story, only a slew of Jerry Falwells. This doesn’t mean that Mr.
    and Mrs. Garotinho, both born-again Christians, differ in their self-serving
    use of the religious infrastructure in their rise to power. Both Presbyterians,
    their power treadmill nonetheless remains the massive, cultish organizations
    of the Igreja Universal do Reino de Deus (Universal Church of the Kingdom
    of God) and the Assembléia de Deus (Assembly of God). Public administration
    has been perverted in their trail. Separation of State from Church, which
    has long shaped Brazil’s democratic political history, has been explicitly
    curtailed.

    ÈsMeanwhile,
    organized crime has assumed unprecedented power. For years, drug lords
    have operated out of Rio’s favelas, a shuttle point for the Colombian
    trade. Teenage gangs bring them the heavily armed support and commando
    tactics needed to spread fear in the population. But the wealthy North’s
    desire for cocaine has stayed unabated despite the millions sunk into
    the US’s War on Drugs—yet another ineffective and costly conservative
    `security’ policy.

    What’s different now
    is that Carioca drug lords are attacking state institutions, orchestrating
    fake road blocks, threatening and murdering innocent civilians, destroying
    state and private assets, and target practicing on Rio’s Military Police.
    On Monday, May 5, gangs even attacked a university in retaliation for
    a leader’s death in a weekend raid. One student was seriously wounded,
    while hundreds more have sunk into fear. Every year, 7 percent of Rio’s
    population is violently assaulted.

    MR. AND MRS. GOVERNOR

    On April 23, in the
    midst of this rising chaos, Governor Matheus dismissed Colonel Josias
    Quintal from his position as Secretary of Public Security. For months
    he had struggled with an underfunded policing sector, stunted additionally
    by the intestine war he was led to wage against the head of police, Alvaro
    Lins. Systematically rejecting pleas for reform issued by Lula’s federal
    government, Rosinha failed—some say refused—to deal with the
    matter. It is nobody’s secret that Rio’s police are among the country’s
    most corrupt while also most underpaid. During her husband’s term as governor
    from 1998-2002, Anthony had preferred to fire his security secretary instead
    of oust the "rotten gang" spreading terror in the squad.

    The new twist for
    law enforcers is to watch with deflating egos as their men are decimated
    by gangsters. Sixteen officers have been murdered only this year. Along
    with them lay the charred framework of over 200 city buses, and the fear
    of merchants in Rio’s most prosperous commercial zones, sporadically shut
    down on order from narco-commanders. In Josias Quintal’s stead, Governor
    Matheus named the man she "most trusts: [her] own husband",
    former governor Anthony Garotinho.

    The move has only
    confirmed suspicions over the Executive’s operating mode. Only four months
    after taking office, the Governor of Rio de Janeiro State is tittering
    on the edge of collapse. `Rosinha’ has proved unable to administer, let
    alone govern, the state. Since taking power on January 1st,
    she has leapt from one crisis to another, facing major public sector strikes
    along the way for failing to cover bonuses and vacation pay. She was swept
    to power in a landslide victory in the very first round of last October’s
    election in a staged ploy that only paranoiacs would fail to believe.

    In the closing months
    of his term as governor, Anthony Garotinho left office to run as presidential
    candidate for his party, the PSB (Brazilian Socialist Party). His Vice-Governor,
    Benedita da Silva of the coalition PT (Workers’ Party) took office. For
    the nine months of her term, she fought daily against a barrage of violence
    from drug lords matched only by the Garotinho’s vociferous accusations
    of mismanagement.

    In hindsight, their
    shots were nothing but pre-emptive strikes. Behind the appearance of populist
    prim, the Garotinhos left a financially stripped state machine. Where
    that money had fled to would soon be revealed in that God-awful Latin
    American scourge: corruption. Perhaps Rosinha was not the racist she appeared
    to be when disinfecting the Palácio das Laranjeiras from governor
    Benedita’s residency. There must have other bugs to exterminate.

    Only weeks into her
    governance, the top staff of her tax inspection team was arrested and
    charged with embezzling public funds and laundering money deposited into
    Swiss bank accounts. The tally is a handsome one, some 30 million American
    dollars. This group of fifteen may still grow as the trial begins. At
    this point, though, they have yet to lose their jobs as the State Parliamentary
    Inquiry Commission organizes the evidence and trial. Among Anthony Garotinho’s
    executive civil servants, they were re-hired by Rosinha until their fateful
    time came in February. Funds were extorted from many of Rio’s most prosperous
    companies in exchange for lessened or forgotten tax-evasion penalties.

    Tax evasion is a bounty
    for punishment anywhere in the world. When a national security state is
    implemented, auditing is one of the first `social’ programs to bite the
    dust. Overdue taxes then get mixed up with personal services. With leadership
    of this kind, is it any wonder organized crime feels empowered to threaten
    the government’s control over parts of the state? Is it really astonishing
    that drug lords dare to choose the language of revolution and guerrilla
    warfare to justify their trade?

    The national capital
    until 1960, Rio de Janeiro was once the hotbed of revolt and seat to the
    sporadic democratic governments that alone have brought Brazil its promised
    prosperity. Today, its residents wonder what has led to the spate of poor
    governance afflicting them term after term. This is not to say that most
    Brazilians aren’t asking themselves what could have led the Cariocas
    to vote for born-again Rosinha in the first place. After all, Rio de Janeiro
    is an intellectual center, home to some of the country’s best universities.
    Why seek evangelical diversion then?

    The current federal
    government’s economic team comes from the city’s celebrated PUC University.
    The federal university is home to the prestigious COPPE engineering research
    institute. One of the country’s leading economic think tanks, the Fundação
    Getúlio Vargas, has its headquarters in Botafogo, across the creek
    from Sugar Loaf Mountain. Rio still houses the National Library, and its
    historic center is populated with museums and galleries. Brazil’s largest
    media conglomerate, Globo, still keeps its headquarters in Rio. Why the
    evangelical illusions when having access to education and information
    of international standards?

    The condition of the
    rest of the state before its fusion with Guanabara (basically the former
    federal zone around the city of Rio de Janeiro) in 1975 is another story.
    Some of the country’s poorest areas are found in the state, whereas the
    Baixada Fluminense, the greater Rio de Janeiro city outskirts, is infamous
    for its vigilante justice and state-specific lawlessness. The state population
    tally at 13.5 million contrasts significantly with the municipality’s
    estimated 6 million. State statistics hasten to point out that Rio’s consumer
    market is equal to that of Chile and greater than those of Paraguay and
    Uruguay put together.

    Per capita income
    would be 60 percent higher than the national average—over US$ 8 thousand
    a year. Yet lacking accurate Purchasing Power Parity figures, that average
    attests especially to great concentration of wealth. In the outskirts,
    apart from the stunning natural beauty, much of the economic relief comes
    from religion. It is rare sight for office high-rises and luxury hotels
    to dot the interior landscape. But rising above the hot breeze, the Christian
    cross is a landmark to trade as well temples.

    Throughout centuries
    of exploration and exploitation, there has been no dearth of comparisons
    likening Brazil’s remarkable beauty to Paradise. Yet the positivist philosophy
    that shaped the country’s democratic republican movement in the late nineteenth
    century set God on his temple pedestal and left Him there—banished
    from affecting the world of human administration. Nowadays though separation
    of religion and state is a thing of the past in Rio de Janeiro. The confusion
    having arisen in its wake should be a lesson for all North Americans who
    see anything redeeming about uttering the name of God in the context of
    a political speech.

    AUTHORITARIAN DEMOCRACY

    Garotinho’s power
    breeds from this background. His appointment as head of Public Security
    is telling of his role. During the whole inquiry into the tax inspection
    fraud he has led a low media profile. But his stealth sojourn was far
    from inactive. As his wife slid ever closer to losing control of the state,
    he is said to have played more than a homemaker husband’s role to the
    couple’s half-dozen kids. Newspaper reports had him sitting in on a state-federal
    meeting during which the feds decided to dispatch the army to the streets
    of Rio for the Carnaval festivities. A few days earlier, drug lords had
    forced shops to close down in Copacabana and Ipanema.

    In her solitary weeks
    at the helm, organized crime was only a secondary issue. Rosinha inherited
    a government with empty coffers. Her predecessor, Benedita, also had.
    Once `Bené’ took office, she covered herself by informing the media
    that Anthony had left nothing for his successor. Her audit of state coffers
    was confirmed by numerous independent sources, including Rio mayor César
    Maia. In failing to pass on the buck, Garotinho bore a poisoned pill to
    his wife. As news of the extent of the financial damage began angering
    the population, his wife’s impetuous behavior turned from her subjects
    toward colleagues at the state and federal level in their bid at passing
    social security reform. In the meantime, Rosinha’s hysterical Rio was
    becoming the laughing stock of the nation. Most people would have kept
    laughing were it not for the increasingly common sound of gunfights puncturing
    the horizon.

    This mixture of pathos
    and perversion explains why the press received Garotinho’s appointment
    with relief. For weeks the pitch had been pounding in the direction of
    a premature change in government. Garotinho’s presence, far from the saving
    grace he has touted it to be, primarily precipitated a cease-fire with
    the press. That no editorial from any major newspaper has thus far decried
    the fall in democratic standards implicated in his appointment is indicative
    of the damage. Even before tackling that issue, one can pause to raise
    a simple doubt. If Garotinho is so central a figure to the government,
    how could he have not known about the tax inspection corruption? If he
    didn’t know about it, how could someone so incompetent be the political
    leader?

    As for how democratic
    the move is, the public security, family and religious catch phrases came
    buzzing when it wasn’t idiomatic populism. Interviewed by the Federal
    District correspondent, Carlos de Lannoy of Globo Cable-TV’s very respected
    "News at Ten", Garotinho first silenced any concerns about the
    Security Secretary Josias de Quintal having been fired. De Lannoy then
    followed up with a hard-hitting question. "Given that de Quintal’s
    dismissal was conceivable, in case of ineffective policies Garotinho’s
    own sacking is unimaginable; how would he react to the accusations of
    nepotism that would surely ensue?", asked de Lannoy. True to form,
    the new Secretary of Public Security completely skirted the issue.

    Whether he continues
    to play the big-mouthed populist, Garotinho will be watched scrupulously.
    Behind the press’s silence, it expects him to adopt President Lula’s policy
    on a single, concerted security action plan. Federal Justice Minister,
    Marcio Thomaz Bastos’s plan calls for complete state-federal partnership
    in pooling information and forces in exchange of hefty increases in federal
    financial assistance.

    Still, Lannoy’s point
    was suggestive. Garotinho evidently needs the press little to build his
    political support. Ministers, `bishops’ and religious peer pressure do
    the job for him. About accountability, most commentators observe that
    Garotinho has dived into an all or nothing risk for his 2004 presidential
    prospects. Either he solves the problem at home and shows himself deserving
    of the top job, or his political career is over.

    Such views hastily
    omits two observable issues. Lannoy alone poked at accountability. Good
    governance without public accountability, which means transparent accounts,
    is impossible to achieve. As Garotinho’s tax inspectors stand trial, he
    has offered no apologies for his or his wife’s accusations of the interim
    government’s complicity over disappeared funds. Nor has he even alluded
    to any critical comments on his gubernatorial term. After all, the `Rio
    War’ didn’t start during the nine months he was out office.

    Instead, the populism
    chants away. On May 3rd, during his weekly Saturday radio show,
    he resumed accusations of Benedita da Silva’s interim government. "The
    PT government in Rio was not good. It has to admit this. It collapsed.
    The governor was weak. I don’t know why Benedita was not prepared or why
    her people weren’t good." He went on to accuse Benedita for mismanaging
    the public funds that she claimed from the outset no longer existed by
    the time of taking office.

    The fact that the
    press has all but eluded Garotinho’s lack of accountability, ecstatically
    reveling in their pastiche of "The New Sheriff’s Come to Town",
    makes then even blinder regarding the second point: predictions over political
    futures. One need only look south to Argentina. Carlos Menem, the former
    president accused of setting up slush funds, is whom most economists consider
    to be the cause of Argentina’s collapse. This did not prevent him from
    winding up in the runoff election, closer to returning to the presidential
    office every week than to the jail cell he deserves.

    Even the Financial
    Times—typically filing social welfare under smart financial jibe,
    never failing to hob-knob with the Third World’s corrupt elite—lamented
    his having to wait another round before returning to the Pink Palace in
    Buenos Aires. At 41 years of age, nothing can count out Garotinho for
    the future—not failure as security secretary, nor possible corruption
    charges. Thinking in such a way would be too logical, too reasonable for
    the political world in which the Garotinhos thrive.

    What will he now do
    that hasn’t already been tried? Mr. Quintal’s comments on April 22 after
    a police van had been ambushed by 20 gunmen in a Rio suburb made it clear
    that the government is using means contrary to its stated intentions.
    Mrs. Matheus has for weeks repeated that her government refuses to negotiate
    with criminals. Yet Mr. Quintal warned that were the twenty assailants
    not found by the following Sunday, he would "be forced to use other
    means at his disposal." Surely he wasn’t referring to Garotinho’s
    appointment.

    Who was Quintal addressing
    this ultimatum to? The assailants or drug lords? If the latter, it’s clear
    the government has been negotiating with them. Only a fool would believe
    that the imprisoned gangster `Fernandinho Beira-Mar’ is orchestrating
    this war alone.

    GOD AND THE STATE
    IN THE SOUTH-NORTH

    The case of Rio de
    Janeiro is a spectacular mix of corruption and the scourge of the underground
    pot and cocaine industry. Administrative transparency has been the case
    now for the fourth consecutive government at the federal level. But Rio’s
    political leadership has only sunk further into secrecy and ineptness.
    Matched with the wealth generated from the cocaine industry, the state
    approaches ever so slowly the national security model of the American
    war on drugs. It is also inheriting its failures.

    For one thing, the
    best way to fight cocaine is to legalize it. The fact that marijuana is
    still illegal in North America should be deemed a crime against reason.
    No amount of money and legal action is going to curb the taste of the
    bad rush that Northern upper middle classes get from snorting the white
    stuff. But Colombia and Brazil would have far less blood spilling in the
    streets were the North to come to terms with their aphrodisiacs. No single
    substance more completely portrays the symbolic and financial capital
    crushing of the poor than cocaine. Where power is most deprived, in ghettoes
    and favelas, the drug is the cheapest—leading to yet another
    generation of youth to burn their lives away by smoking crack.

    The only sensible
    voice on this matter came from the Folha de S. Paulo. In an editorial
    published last January it called for legalization of cocaine as the most
    effective remedy to cut organized crime down. Legalize cocaine must be
    repeated not only through the streets of Rio de Janeiro and São
    Paulo, but also in Miami, L.A. and D.C. Legalize it—by which I mean
    subject it to the tough regulations by which alcohol is let to trace its
    destiny in free market economics.

    Alcohol is far more
    tested an addictive aphrodisiac than is cocaine, let alone pot. Legalize
    cocaine—but barring stimulations to its consumption through commercial
    ads. Legalize it—and ban the bloody arm of narcotics: fire arms,
    i.e. weapons of minority destruction. The blood and repression of the
    poor can no longer be the currency exchanged for the pleasures of the
    American and European rich. It is time to quit pointing to poverty as
    cause for the coke industry. Wealth is no less a cause of moral depravity
    than is disparity.

    But behind the appearances
    of sophisticated discourse and designer clothing, when the `model’ classes
    and societies project only corruption and lawlessness as their real trade,
    what should lead the rest of society and the world to ethical behavior?

    Given that the model
    society projected to Brazil today is the USA, criticism made by its journalists
    and pundits of Latin America often seem gratuitous when lacking full exposure
    of their own country’s flaws and crimes. After all with the world’s highest
    GDP, nearing 10 trillion dollars, the social record of the USA is contemptible.
    Fifteen percent of its population lives below the poverty line. Over any
    given two-year period, roughly one-third of the population spends some
    time without basic medical insurance. The American public education system
    is in shambles, even were we to focus only on science teaching. The production
    of American pop culture, steeped as it is in violence, seeps the general
    population’s meager wealth into a suicidal thrill of increased idiocy.

    This matched with
    the decrease of middle class wealth from its prime in the 1960s makes
    an outside observer wonder in amazement at where the trillions lie and
    how they get recycled into the community—if they do at all. Median
    real wage is only 7 percent higher now than it was in 1979. Whereas top
    income increases since 1970 soared to 500 times that of the average worker’s
    wage. Even Wall Street’s annus horribilis of 2002 still garnered
    median executive pay a 14 percent boost. Citing the US as a model, contrary
    to what many Americans are led by their corporate media to believe, is
    done not to offend alone, but to insist on how that country could be so
    much more.

    Yet the middle classes,
    following decades of disparaging aristocratic-retrograde descriptions
    of intellectual mediocrity and cultural ineptness, are now in a struggle
    to maintain their economic and political power within democracies. This
    point just doesn’t seem to want to take hold. Economic class differences
    are being wiped over by the political tastes of a fabricated "investor
    class", with a supposed disgust of government spending. What do these
    pundits call warfare, international intervention, the IMF and World Bank,
    homeland security and the entire defense industry? Are these sectors of
    the economy supposed to exemplify free market behavior, whereas only education,
    health and culture are to be damned from government spending?

    Regarding southern
    mimicking of the northern model, and its incumbent failures, in the eyes
    of the North the South may just as well be blamed for the problem. Not
    that this is either new or surprising. As Tarik Ali writes, all foreign
    news in the US "is exaggeratedly simplified and reduced to a state
    of preoccupying incomprehensibility." Most dramatic is how the tone
    filing corruption and inequality at the place mat of the South’s door
    alone is present even in the liberal press. Marc Cooper’s recent piece
    on Brazil and the PT in 1The Nation simply fails to address the
    question of the powerlessness of the middle classes to curb violence and
    impose economic reform while the elite’s political will, at home and abroad,
    is more intent on crushing its advances in the legislative realm.

    With a population
    bred on simplifications and reductions, whether in North, Central or South
    America, religion is given a clear path to populate its celestial doctrines.
    The disturbing fact is that few if any governments under religious jurisdiction
    recognize accountability as a primary principle of governance. Many North
    Americans of strong religious persuasions don’t seem to be concerned about
    mingling God with the polity. Right-wing propagandists are all too ready
    to reassure them in their philosophical carelessness.

    Depending on one’s
    faith, God’s actions on human life may be more or less direct. In political
    atheism, it is existent only as a ploy. The Bush government, consisting
    of the wealthiest and most tightly-knit corporate group ever assembled
    in the capital, seems to think that God’s effect is more direct, that
    God is on America’s side. Surely, when curtailing ethical norms and legal
    prescriptions on the most spectacular accumulation of wealth within America’s
    richest and the most spectacular plunge in Wall Street, the middle class—denying
    the pathetic disgust of its own powerlessness—seems to prefer explaining
    the successes of the rich by divine right alone.

    When it comes to being
    accountable for public service, God is not the one to blame for the failings
    of human beings. This is the veil systematically eluding the Religion/State
    cluster clan. Humans may be a fallible species, as with every living being
    destined to die. But we also have the power to establish laws by which
    our actions will be evaluated and judged. This is the philosophy the Enlightenment
    broke into the theocratic political culture of the Western world, and
    which the Church so vehemently fought against. It has also become the
    history lesson our democracies no longer see a point in teaching.

    Certainly it makes
    for boring reading when the history lessons most Americans get come from
    the diatribe of Fox News, or Brazilians from the innumerable novelas
    on Globo. Religions have made inroads to politics worldwide, consolidating
    themselves for generations to come. Today America with its fundamentalist
    minority holding the reigns of power is clearly akin to fundamentalist
    regimes of other stripes. Only the blind would claim that, contrary to
    their fundamentalism, ours is of a good kind.

    No one is arguing
    that secular states are foolproof. We’re merely saying that trying a culprit
    in court, especially when they’re a big fish, is a lot easier when God
    is not in the judge’s seat. Ask your local mafia don what he thinks of
    that as he kneels in prayer to the almighty at the church to which he
    so generously gives tax-free donations. While we do see the honesty of
    wealthy northerners regarding credence displayed over and over, Cariocas
    of all walks of life must ask themselves seriously whether submission
    is part of God’s will, or that of the crooks speaking in His name.

    A researcher
    in philosophy and the social sciences, Norman Madarasz, PhD, writes
    on international relations for Brazzil, CounterPunch,
    IslamOnLine and other publications. He lives in Rio de Janeiro,
    and welcomes comments at nmphdiol@yahoo.ca
     

     

     

    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    National Fashion from Brazil

    Brazil Learns How to Make Money Being Eco-Friendly

    Some of the verbs often used by small businesses in Brazil that invest in ...

    Brazil Decrees Preventive Detention for US Nun Killers

    Three individuals suspected of Saturdays’s, February 12, pistol killing of 76 year-old American missionary, ...

    A Kinder and Gentler Mercosur, Courtesy of Brazil

    Brazil will continue working to eliminate obstacles which have effects on Mercosur junior members, ...

    Ecuador Buys 3 Jets from Brazil’s Embraer

    Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer announced today it firmed the sale of three Embraer 170/190 ...

    Telma, a character in Globo's Paraíso Tropical

    Here’s Brazil’s New Audience Champion: Another Trashy Novela

    Brazil has a new 9 pm novela (soap opera): Paraíso Tropical (Tropical Paradise). You ...

    Lula in Venezuela

    Chavez Compares Brazil’s Lula to Jesus and Sees Venezuela in Mercosur

    There was a love fest this Friday between presidents Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ...

    Mothers of the Plaza Sé

    Mothers of the Plaza Sé in Brazil Want More Action to Find Disappeared Kids

    The Brazilian Association for the Defense of Missing Children (ABCD), known as the Mothers ...

    NYT Reporter Calls Brazilian Air Control Terrible

    Joe Sharkey, the New York Times reporter who was in the small jet that ...

    Brazil’s Gol Airline Flies Another Mile Into Collapsing Varig’s Airspace

    Brazilian airline Gol, one of the fastest growing in the industry, will begin regular ...

    Brazil's Electronics Valley

    How Education and Hard Work Built Up Brazil’s Silicon Valley

    The year was 1959. The place, Santa Rita do Sapucaí, a city in southeastern ...