Brazzil

Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil

Home Articles October 2008 São Paulo Mayoral Election - a Foretaste of the Brazilian Presidential Race?

Search

Custom Search
Members : 6824
Content : 3573
Content View Hits : 24885742

Who's Online

We have 501 guests online

Login Form






São Paulo Mayoral Election - a Foretaste of the Brazilian Presidential Race? PDF Print E-mail
2008 - October 2008
Written by John Fitzpatrick   
Monday, 27 October 2008 20:07

President Lula and governor José Serra The humiliating defeat of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's candidate in the São Paulo mayoral vote is being treated with glee by the anti-Lula media which is painting it as a setback for him. This is wishful thinking as Lula still enjoys massive popular support and the defeat was more of a rejection of the Workers Party (PT) candidate, Marta Suplicy, who is detested by a large section of the electorate.

The real winner was not the incumbent, Gilberto Kassab of the DEMs, but the state governor, José Serra, who backed him against the wishes of a section of his own PSDB party. Kassab's victory paves the way for Serra to target the Planalto Palace after Lula steps down. In fact, the São Paulo contest may well have been a forerunner of the 2010 election with Serra pitted against another woman candidate backed by Lula, Dilma Rousseff.

Another victor may have been the DEM party, which used to call itself the PFL and originated in the ARENA party, which backed the military. When democracy was restored, the PFL tried to position itself as a center-right party which supported free market policies. It failed in ideological terms since there is little appeal for this message in Brazil even among right-wing parties, which are strongly nationalist and in favor of a strong role for the state.

The party was also closely identified with Senator Antonio Carlos Magalhães who died last year and the northeastern state of Bahia, which he dominated for almost 50 years as an old-style autocratic boss. Despite this background, the PFL has always had a good relationship with the PSDB which is a social democratic party. The PFL even provided Fernando Henrique Cardoso's vice president during his two terms in office - a Northeasterner called Marco Maciel.

The DEMs aim to use Kassab's four-year term to build up a power base and become a national force. Whether this will work is doubtful as Kassab is seen in many quarters as being almost a puppet of Serra. Some reports say he even wanted to join the PSDB but agreed to stay put at Serra's command. At the same time, Kassab has little dynamism and if there had been a stronger candidate facing him he might not have won.

His victory was due to a combination of antipathy for Marta Suplicy from voters who blamed her for high taxes and poor services during her administration plus an incompetent campaign by the PT, which tried to insinuate that Kassab was a homosexual. One particularly inept TV slot targeted his background and raised questions such as "Is he married? Does he have children?" as though being unmarried and childless ruled anyone out of politics.

Returning to Serra, he will now have to win over the faction within the PSDB that was annoyed with him for ditching the PSDB candidate, Geraldo Alckmin, for Kassab. This should not be a problem as Serra is now the one of the strongest politicians in São Paulo. A tougher task will be to entice the PMDB, which did well in the elections and (narrowly) won Brazil's second-largest city, Rio de Janeiro, where its candidate, Eduardo Paes, made much of the message of support he received from Lula.

Although the PMDB officially supports Lula's government, it was also a member of Fernando Henrique Cardoso's governments. It is more interested in sitting at the top table than having the presidency itself and if it feels that Serra is a winner then it would not hesitate to ditch the PT and return to a PSDB-led government. The same goes for a number of the smaller parties which back Lula.

In any case, the presidential election is not usually seen as a contest between parties but individuals and much will depend on the PT's choice of candidate. At the moment this looks like being Lula's chief of staff, Dilma Rousseff. Despite being Lula's favorite, Rousseff has no political experience and is unknown among the general public.

The PT may decide that a heavyweight would be a better choice and opt for someone like Jaques Wagner, the governor of Bahia, or the justice minister, Tarso Genro. One long-standing PT member who will not be called up to dispute the presidential election is Marta Suplicy although, who knows, we might see her returning to the federal government as a minister or stand for the state governorship elections in two years' time. 

One final point, there is still a long way to go to 2010 and, given the present financial and economic volatility, it would be unwise for Serra to take anything for granted. Lula might find that the last two years of his presidency will be devoted to coping with the fallout of a world recession which could hammer Brazil and overturn all the benefits of recent years.

This could lead to him throwing caution to the winds and turning his back on the "neo-liberal" policies hated by leftists in the PT and returning to its traditional policies of raising government spending, ignoring inflation and sending Brazil back to the bad old days.

In circumstances like this the next election could become a battle between a social democrat like Serra and a socialist like Rousseff where ideology rather than personality plays a big part. In this case, Serra could face a tougher battle than he might imagine at the moment.

John Fitzpatrick is a Scottish writer and consultant with long experience of Brazil. He is based in São Paulo and runs his own company Celtic Comunicações. This article originally appeared on his site www.brazilpoliticalcomment.com.br. He can be contacted at jf@celt.com.br.

© John Fitzpatrick 2008



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (7)Add Comment
"Pauliceia" demonstrates superior political decision against repugnant labor candidate
written by Augustus, October 28, 2008
Considering the distressing nature of the Brazilian political arena, where the overwhelming majority of elected officials are thoroughly corrupt, particularly the members of the repulsive Labor Party (and its subservient, allied factions), it is scarcely surprising that an exceedingly ignorant populace repeatedly select scoundrels to represent them, in powerful positions at every level of government.

Additional examples of political naïveté can be founds in major urban centers such as the city of Rio de Janeiro, where the obtuse citizenry supported a candidate belonging to a party (PMDB) which pledges political allegiance to the incompetent Brazilian (self-appointed) “ruler”. The disappointing electoral results in Brazil’s second largest Metropolis was particularly distressing, on the personal level, even though I have left Brazil several years ago, because the lovely but unfortunate Rio de Janeiro is “my home-town”…

At the very least the awe-inspiring reports of a significant Labor defeat in Brazil’s wealthiest, most cosmopolitan, and sophisticated city has filled my heart with joy and hope for Brazil’s future…

Consequently, I must congratulate the wise choice made by the citizens of fabulous, vibrant city of Sao Paulo!
...
written by João da Silva, October 28, 2008
At the very least the awe-inspiring reports of a significant Labor defeat in Brazil’s wealthiest, most cosmopolitan, and sophisticated city has filled my heart with joy and hope for Brazil’s future…


Another "cosmopolitan and Sophisticated" city where PT was thrashed even in the First round is Curitiba. smilies/cheesy.gif
....particularly the members of the repulsive Labor Party (and its subservient, allied factions)
written by ch.c., October 29, 2008
It is just question of price not political ideology....in Brazil !

If you go back to the vote buying scandals articles, it is simply amazing the number of politicians moving to another political party !!!!

It becomes a question of rights (straight corruption for vote buying with cash) and budgets allowances for projects which themselves are full of corruption.
Simple example : a year before Lula re-election, HE decided to fill the potholes in several thousands kilometers of roads.
Budget so small that some brazilians experts said...it will just suffice to fill the potholes with sand. And the sand will run away by the next rainy season !
Some photos published and even short videos on TV Globo even showed children filling the potholes with Noooo truck around loaded with sand. They just took soil from the side of the road !!!!!!

After the "work" was done by many local enterprises, the audit showed 73 companies had irregularities in their accounting !
End result : of course....no one was sued or bothered !

And Brazil remains with 5 % of paved roads !
BR 163 from/to Mato Grosso, with tens of promises to be paved by Lula or his predecessors...still not paved after 30 years !
Never seen it ? Here it is
A) the maquetta interativa (smiles)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZdLU2HOBQA

B) the sad daily reality (pay attention to the 6-8 decades old "truck" at the start of the video)
http://mariri.net/rainforest-blog/?p=7

And some statements :
- The rhetoric intensified this year when Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva earmarked about $800 million to pave the entire highway by 2010. So far, work has gone slowly, and Brazilian army engineers said they were paving only 12 miles of road a year.
- “This road is a national shame!” ranted 53-year-old Jorge Luiz Calvacanti, who raises crops and cattle on 494 acres about 115 miles down the road from Santarem. “How could they be so irresponsible as to ignore the country’s main artery that connects its north to its south?”

No doubt...some of the earmarked money...will end up in many pockets...not for paving the roads !!!!!!
In defense of Dilma Rousseff; Explaing the PT-PSDB divide; Poor voters know whats best for them
written by Rosh, October 29, 2008
This analysis is poor and biased. You describe Serra as a social democrat and Rousseff as a socialist. This is rubbish. There is not much of an ideological difference between Serra and Rousseff that I can detect. Indeed, Rousseff has been a driving force behind getting the private sector more involved in infrastructure projects for example, something that is highly controversial even here in the "free-market" United States.

Observing Brazilian politics from a distance, the polarization between the PT and PSDB has long baffled me when you consider that the policies that both parties pursue at the national level are basically identical. I have come to the conclusion that the key factor behind the PT-PSDB polarization is a sort of class identification. The PT represents the electoral expression of the poor and lower-middle class, which provokes an oppositional reaction from the upper-middle class. The greater power of the poor is threatening to the upper-class because in Brazil, gains are seen as zero-sum. If the poor are prospering, the middle class think that their (the poor) prosperity is coming at their expense. This sort of political dynamic reminds me of the American South were I grew up. In the South, Whites and Blacks define themselves in opposition to each other so voting for different political parties is a natural result.

Augustus, describing voters who disagree with your electoral wishes as stupid and naive is elitist and anti-democratic. It was quite predictable that a candidate like Gabeira running on a platform of ethics and honesty would appeal much less to poor and working-class voters than he would to wealthier voters. Poorer voters everywhere in the world are most interested in politicians who will directly improve their lives. An effective government can literally mean life or death for them; therefore, they are most interested in results rather than the process. A politician like Gabeira that fetishizes ethics and not attacking his opponent (in other words, the process of politics) is going to have a much tougher time winning poorer voters than a more practical political. Incidentally, this was Obama's big problem in the Democratic primary against Hillary Clinton and to a lesser extent in the general election before the financial crisis became acute a few weeks ago and thus made the outcome of the election entirely predictable in his favor.

In defense of Dilma Rousseff; Explaing the PT-PSDB divide; Poor voters know whats best for them
written by João da Silva, October 29, 2008
My two cents worth:

Observing Brazilian politics from a distance, the polarization between the PT and PSDB has long baffled me when you consider that the policies that both parties pursue at the national level are basically identical.


It may baffle you since you are a distant observer, but not the honest and well informed Brazilians. There is not much of a difference between PT,PSDB or for that matter PMDB. We call them "Farinha do mesmo saco". I don't know if you are aware that PSDB and PMDB are two rival factions of erstwhile MDB. You are in a way correct when talking about "Class identification". However, I do not think that PT represents the "poor and the lower middle class". It does promote personality cult and populism much better than the rest of the parties, effectively using their propaganda machine. Without its ally PMDB, it will not be able to "Rule", especially after the success of the PMDB in the Municipal elections.That is just a temporary set back, as they are capable of mobilizing the labor unions, the Student Union and MST just in time for the 2010 elections to come out with its own lady candidate (as promised by Lula).

Augustus, describing voters who disagree with your electoral wishes as stupid and naive is elitist and anti-democratic.


Knowing our distinguished blogger Augustus, he was neither elitist not anti-democratic.He was merely complimenting the "Paulistanos" for having elected a Technocrat instead of a demagogue like his fellow Cariocas did. In fact Augustus has to be praised for being blunt.

As for Dilma, she did not really start her political career in PT.The capital of the state where she made her "Career" voted for a candidate of PMDB as the Mayor!! That shows how popular she is in her home base.



Brazillian lawyer kidnaps American child
written by SteveW, November 03, 2008
musica
written by junu, March 16, 2009

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack