Brazzil

Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil

Search

Custom Search

Cheap Mobile Phones
---------------
Members : 2552
Content : 3357
Content View Hits : 20828042

Who's Online

We have 215 guests online

Login Form



Related Items


Pingo
Breaking News from Brazil
From Brazzil Mag news team
Brazzil Magazine


Lula - Brazil's Big Spender PDF Print E-mail
Written by John Fitzpatrick   
Wednesday, 07 June 2006 14:44

Construction in BrazilIt's easy to spend other people's money as you will know if you have ever had an expense account. However, it's a different story when someone else is spending your money. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has been doing a lot of this recently and leaving the taxpayer and future generations to foot the bill.

He has just approved wage increases ranging from 5% to 20% for 160,000 public service workers at an estimated extra cost to the public purse this year of 1.4 billion reais (about US$ 636 million). Lula's generosity may stem from his deep-seated feeling that these workers and pensioners deserve their increases.

On the other hand, it may be connected with the upcoming presidential election and  be nothing more than a massive bribe to win the votes of those who benefit from his generosity at other people's expense.

When Lula makes speeches, he often mentions the days when he was still a metal worker and how he and his wife had to scrape by. They could only buy things when they had saved enough money to do so, he claims. He then says that the country should do the same and spend within its means. This was how Margaret Thatcher, another politician with a simplistic view of the world, used to talk but Thatcher actually put her words into action.

Lula has been not been consistent. On one hand, he has handled the economy responsibly - giving the Central Bank freedom to set interest rates and not meddling in the currency market to check the appreciation of the real - but on the other hand he has done little to check higher spending.

The bill for the latest pay rises will increase even more as various other public employees demand and get their share. The military, for example, is expected to receive a raise of 10% in August, which will cost an additional 1.2 billion reais. One report says the total increase could be as much as 7.6 billion reais.

This move follows the decision to increase the minimum wage from 300 reais a month to 350 reais - an impressive rise of around 16%. This, in turn, will push up the pensions of retired public workers which are linked to the minimum wage.

Other sweeteners include a 20% rise in the Bolsa Família social program which encourages poor families to send their children to school. Over nine million families currently benefit from this program and the government is studying how to add another two million families.

The construction and farm sectors have also benefited from packages worth around 18.7 billion reais and 13.4 billion reais respectively. The government would deny any link with these measures and the election since the law says that increases in spending in an election year must be made until June 30.

Few people would believe this just as few people believe Lula has not yet made up his mind whether to stand. His style of governing is to avoid tough issues and spend his time flying around the country, opening infrastructure projects and addressing public meetings which are almost like election rallies.
 
Day of Reckoning Beckons

The day of reckoning must come. Government spending is rising by around 10% a year. At this rate, it will start becoming more difficult to achieve the target of a primary surplus of 4.25% of GDP. The target seems achievable this year since the main effects of this new spending will only apply to the second semester.

However, if the government is to meet this target in coming years it will either have to cut back on spending or borrow more, since there is no fat left on the taxpayer, individual or corporate. Since most state spending goes to plugging the deficit in the public pensions account, productive areas which desperately need funds, such as infrastructure projects, will have to wait.

This imbalance also affects Brazil's image abroad and means the country is still some way from obtaining investment grade status. I recently attended a conference in São Paulo organized by Moody's Investors Service ratings agency and this was the main point stressed by one of Moody's executives.

He pointed out the great strides Brazil had made in recent years, such as reducing the foreign debt from US$ 235.4 billion in 2003 to US$ 187.9 in 2005, improving the profile of the foreign debt and converging towards peer countries with investment grade such Mexico and South Africa. However, he made it clear that unless the fiscal problem was tackled it would be some time before Brazil received investment grade.

Readers who are not familiar with finance should know that receiving investment grade is not just a pat on the head for good behavior but brings a significant advantage in negotiating interest rates from foreign lenders. A better investment grade means cheaper loans. This is why the progress Brazil has made in cutting its foreign debt is so important.

Endemic Corruption

Finally, another reason for being concerned about public spending in Brazil has nothing to do with financial statistics but efficiency and morality. Vast amounts of money destined for public works are used inefficiently or siphoned off by corruption. Hardly a day goes by without newspapers printing articles on the latest cases of corruption.

Political life in Brasília has been overshadowed by the "bribes for votes" corruption scandal for the last year. The Estado de S. Paulo newspaper recently featured an article based on a report of the body (CGU) which oversees the federal public accounts. An audit by this body identified corrupt practices in 77% of all municipalities in the country.

It mentioned eight states in which every single municipal government showed serious problems involving corruption. In one case it said federal resources destined for flood relief victims had been used to build houses for employees of the municipal government. Much of the extra money big spender Lula is currently doling out will go the same way.           

John Fitzpatrick is a Scottish writer and consultant with long experience of Brazil. He is based in São Paulo and runs his own company Celtic Comunicações. This article originally appeared on his site www.brazilpoliticalcomment.com.br. He can be contacted at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

© John Fitzpatrick 2006

Comments (31)Add Comment
ad nauseam
written by Guest, June 07, 2006
For Christ sakes....here we go again. I say kill the frigging bastard.
...
written by Guest, June 07, 2006
quote:

"The Estado de S. Paulo newspaper recently featured an article based on a report of the body (CGU) which oversees the federal public accounts. An audit by this body identified corrupt practices in 77% of all municipalities in the country."

77%?? I thought it would be closer to 95%!

Still....that's such a horrific number it's no wonder that other serious countries in the world just chuckle when brazilian politicians make statements like, "we'll be the largest energy exporter in the world!"

quote:

"It mentioned eight states in which every single municipal government showed serious problems involving corruption. In one case it said federal resources destined for flood relief victims had been used to build houses for employees of the municipal government. Much of the extra money big spender Lula is currently doling out will go the same way. "

Now that's a great little message for all those that talk s**t and use a hurricane(Katrina) to try and prove something negative about the U.S.

Katrina was a natural disaster, that obviously FEMA was not even close to being prepared for something of that magnitude, BUT...at least the administrators of FEMA aren't taking monies to go to help in the disaster and building homes for themselves!!!!

My god, how low can people go? Don't they worry about their souls?


RE \"we\'ll be the largest energy export
written by Guest, June 07, 2006
Although I would agree with you in most of the things you say about Brazil here in this site, I have to tell you that at this time you can safely bet your ass that Brazil will be one the largest exporter of fuel in the world, easily.

The logic is very simple even for a child. The Brazil is a land of agriculture and huge producer of agricultural goods. Then, in order to become a huge producer of alcohol and biodiesel is basically a question of demand. And the world is already a huge market for biodiesel.

And even if you throw some of the usual cheap arguments about how corrupted is Brazil, the reality is that, in spite of that, Brazil is growing economically.

Some people do propagate myths here or misinterpret statistics or the news to make a very poor elaborated thesis against Brazil’s future.

Let’s face it. You can argue against our government (I will not argue against that and I am with you) and even against the passivity of the MAJORITY of our people (ditto) but you cannot argue against the fact that Brazil is strengthening economically even when in the political arena we are progressing very slowly.
we\'ll be the largest energy export
written by Guest, June 07, 2006
So what man?
You say it is growing? Growing where? To whom it is growing?
How is it that the middle class is disappearing? How come the gap between the poor and the rich is increasing? How come the favelas just do not stop growing? How come public health is still a disgrace? Have you ever been to a brazilian public hospital?
Give me a breack....and please do not talk rubish.
RE: we\'ll be the largest energy export
written by Guest, June 07, 2006
You are a Brazilian and you do not have the courage of admitting that. What a shame!

You are the one talking rubbish and propagating myths.

You have nothing but news collected here and there and misinterpreted through your undereducated mind.

I am a Brazilian and I do openly let people know about that and you ask me to give you a break. How pathetic!

Go read more and learn!
Question:
written by Guest, June 07, 2006
Can anyone provide quasi-real numbers that support the idea of Brazil being a major energy exporter? The numbers would have to be staggering in order for Brazil to satisfy its local energy market, deal with internal economic growth, and have enough left over to be a major exporter.

To get an idea, the biofuel energy equivalent of 1,000,000 barrels of oil production per day would be about 220,000,000 liters of biofuel per day. How much land would it take to produce the desired result, and is there enough of the right kind, in the right climate? Is there enough labor available? Would the cost still be reasonable if production was expanded? What other kinds of fuel could Brazil produce? These are some initial questions, but there are many, many more.

To put this in perspective, I think that I read recently that the current world output of oil is about 85,000,000 barrels per day.

It's not a good idea to make judgements one way or the other about a thing like this without working the numbers to see if it's possible.


Fala Serio!
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
well, I for one can tell you its not possible, and certainly not by the time Lula claimed brazil would be the #1 energy exporter, I believe he said by 2012.....that's five and a half years from now folks...how much energy(oil, biofuels) is brazil currently exporting?

First of all, the World Energy Resources Program estimates that there are 1,000 gigabarrels of "known" oil reserves that exist on the planet today and they will be exhausted in 50 years. The Middle East has HALF of these known reserves. As far as oil reserves are concerned, here is a list of countries and their reserves in gigabarrels.

Country/Region Lowest estimate Highest estimate

North America 40.9 214.8
Canada 4.7 178.8
United States 21.3 29.3
Mexico 12.9 14.8
Central & South America 76 101.1
Venezuela 52.4 77.2
Brazil 10.6 11.2
Western Europe 16.2 17.3
Eastern Europe & Former USSR 79.2 121.9
Russia 60 72.3
Kazakhstan 9 39.6
Middle East 708.3 733.9
Iran 125.8 130.8
Iraq 115 115
Kuwait 99 101.5
Qatar 15.2 20
Saudi Arabia 261.9 262.7
UAE 69.9 97.8
Africa 100.8 112.4
Algeria 11.4 15.3
Libya 33.6 39.1
Nigeria 35.3 36.6
Asia and Oceania 36.2 41.1
China 15.4 18.3
Australia 1.5 4
India 4.9 5.6
Indonesia 4.7 5.3
World total 1082 1277

As you can see, as far as oil is concerned, Brazil doesn't come close to have a large quantity of reserves. The U.S. has twice as much, Mexico has more, Venezuela has 5 times as much, Russia 6, Iraq has 11 times as much, Iran 12, Kuwait 10 times, and Saudi Arabia 26 times more oil reserves than brazil. So as far as energy being exported, brazil doesn't hold a candle to the world leaders in oil reserves.

So where is this energy going to come from? Biofuels or alcohol or you say?

Firstly, biofuels are not a cheap and efficient method of energy. And, they are not being considered to be used as stand-alone products, they are being used, and being considered to be used as a "mixture" with gasoline, not as a substitute. Also, the amount of land needed to produce sugar cane, soy, etc., to produce the amount of energy needed, let's say for a country like the United States, would be staggering, larger than the entire country of brazil!

Here are some facts about biodiesel, and keep in mind, when a country talks about being a "world leader" in energy exportation, his primary market IS the United States, as they use more energy than the entire rest of the world combined.

Biodiesel:

"Use of biodiesel results in increased levels of harmful nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions when used in diesel engines, although not usually in residential heating equipment. Also, in and of itself biodiesel releases the same amount of hydrocarbon (or soluble carbon) emissions when burned as regular diesel. Furthermore, pure biodiesel has a high "clouding" point, meaning that liquid biodiesel begins to thicken into a solid at low temperatures. Because of its higher clouding point, biodiesel is more difficult to store and transport in cold climates, which adds to its cost."

Ethanol:

"Depending on the ethanol/gasoline blend, ethanol may raise levels of nitrogen oxides produced as gasoline emissions. Because of its lower energy content relative to gasoline, ethanol also reduces mileage per gallon. Corn-based ethanol production is energy intensive, and in some instances uses nearly as much energy to produce (including the energy needed for farming and making fertilizers) than it supplies, although new technologies are improving the efficiency of production."


To make a claim that Brazil is going to be the worlds leading energy exporter, in ANY time period, yet alone in the next five and a half years is LUDICROUS.

First of all, it's just not feasible, and EVEN if it was, it would take a hurculean task in management, efficiency, and organization....and I'm sorry y'all, but those just aren't brazilian characteristics. Not mentioning a word about the epidemic-like numbers in corruption that would throw everything into a tail-spin.




Brasil: world\'s largest exporter of ene
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
I hope Lula can do it, or Brasil might look like a laughingstock? Is that the word? America has so much agriculture stuffs to export but it farms different. It uses huge mechanized farms. I think it will be many years until Brasil can be as big. Also America admits what such farming is doing to its land. Huge areas of American soils are now leached and require lots fertilizer to even grow. But who knows? I say give Lula a chance.
...
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
wouldn't you think you would use the land to feed your people before you use it to make biofuels to export?
A Chance
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
We've already given him lots of chances, and, what happened? Three days ago MST group (Landless Workers Movement), attached our Congress, and also securities guys who WERE there to protect innocent people. Other point is that the movement leader is friend of our president. I was never as ashamed of being Brazilian as now, and it’s so easy for those who do NOT live in here to say to give another chance to our ‘president’. Please... I am really sick of that.
Very Disturbing
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
Unfortunately, I got this in Portuguese and I don't have time to translate. For those Brazilians and foreigners able to read Portuguese. From a lady called Catherine (not her real name for obvious reasons since Brazil is not a truly democratic country)

This happened on 04/30/2006:

"Estava almoçando com meu pai, por volta das 14:00 hs no restaurante Famiglia Mancini, aqui em São Paulo, quando constatei a presença, em uma mesa próxima, do parlamentar do PT Professor Luizinho - aquele que "só pegou vinte mil do valerioduto" e por isso foi absolvido. Estava o dito sujeito acompanhado de mais dois homens e três mulheres, bem mais jovens que eles, todos almoçando regados a vinho de muitíssima boa qualidade, em meio a piadinhas e comentários impróprios entre os homens e as mulheres da mesa. Próximo à mesa deles estava um senhor com a família, de umas 6 ou 7 pessoas, estavam comemorando o seu aniversário junto ao que - acredito eu - eram seus filhos e respectivas companheiras. Foi pedido ao pianista que anima o local que tocasse "Parabéns a Você" e, tão logo o pedido foi atendido, o parlamentar começou a reclamar, visto que se encontrava ao celular e aparentemente não conseguia ouvir o que seu interlocutor falava. Muito embora a comemoração tenha ido até o fim, percebi que as pessoas na mesa do aniversariante ficaram um pouco incomodadas com os reclamos, de forma que, após pagarem a conta e se retirarem, um dos rapazes falou bem alto "esse é o tipo de gente que governa o nosso país". Só isso. Virou-se e saiu com os demais. Meu pai e eu já havíamos pagado a conta também e acabamos por sair juntos. O que presenciamos na porta do restaurante só pode ser adjetivado de "grotesco". O tal Professor Luizinho, junto com seus outros dois acompanhantes - numa lição de democracia petista - saíram atrás do sujeito que havia ousado lhes repudiar a atitude deselegante, e passaram a proferir ofensas de baixo calão na porta do restaurante, na presença de mulheres e crianças. Como o sujeito já se encontrava dentro de seu carro - uma Ford Ecosport preta - ele baixou um pouco o vidro e, respondendo às provocações do parlamentar e seus acompanhantes, que o incitavam a sair do carro para resolver a pendenga no braço, falou "ao invés de eu sair, entrem aqui vocês e a gente vai na imprensa relatar isso tudo". Ao ouvir isso, um dos asseclas do tal parlamentar passou a desferir chutes violentos na porta do veículo do cidadão e a mandá-lo descer - tudo com o incentivo e participação do professor Luizinho. Só pararam diante dos apelos de uma senhora que ali estava também e pediu para que parassem com aquela confusão. O "grand finalle" veio com a frase proferida pelo Professor Luizinho enquanto o veículo se afastava: "Seu bobão. A minha conta quem pagou foi você. Seu bobão". Confesso que só não achei que estava ouvindo demais porque estava a menos de um metro do sujeito. Esse ato de prepotência e violência descabida precisa ser informado à sociedade. Esse tipo de indivíduo pode ter sido absolvido por seus pares - talvez porque tenham o rabo preso, ou talvez por simples despreparo político - mas esse tipo de atitude tem que ser divulgada de forma ampla para que o povo possa ter o poder de bani-lo para sempre da vida pública do país. Estou enojada e confesso que quase parti também para as vias de fato com esse indivíduo pois, ao chamar de "bobão" um cidadão que só fez a "bobagem" de expressar a sua opinião, chamou a mim também pela mesma alcunha, já que eu também pago impostos e fui responsável também - segundo o raciocínio do "professor Luizinho" - pelo pagamento de sua conta no restaurante. Meu Deus. Só fico pensando se ninguém nesse país vai tomar uma atitude para tirar essa quadrilha do poder"
É DEPRIMENTE.
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
Precisamos ( eu, você, outros) armar uma estratégia para expulsar essa gente. Enquanto não houver organização para tal, nada feito. Foi bom você ter exposto o fato. Parabéns. É pena que essa roupa suja fique exposta a estranhos ao Brasil. Que fazer...?
...
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
you guys need to find some Lee Havey Oswalds, John Wilkes Booths, and Sirhan Sirhans. Guarantee ya that'll shake 'em up a helluva lot more than that little chair-breaking escpade in brasilia the other day!
Fertilizers ?????
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
You seem not to be aware that Brazil/Amazon land is quite poor, thus needing far more fertilizers than in America !

Concerning Lula and his promises, they are not worth 1 centavo !
I guess he was drunk as usual.
Eventually he will change the Brazilian National Alcohol from Cachaça to Ethanol !
He already is making the tests himself by drinking a gallon every day !
Lula is not a big spender !
written by Guest, June 08, 2006


He is a big BUYER !
VOTE BUYER OF COURSE !

And it is not even his money....but yours !
So why should he care ??????
largest energy export
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
"You are a Brazilian and you do not have the courage of admitting that. What a shame!"

Hey MORON: answer the questions and do not come with your condescending remarks. Do you know what condescending is? I will bet you will run to the dictionary.
You must be a LULA voter or an idiot that believes the brazilian government propaganda.
An American
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
As long as there has been govenment there have been corrupt politicians. Brazil certainly does not have a monoply on corruption.
I am an American and we do have corrupt politicians in the USA. No sooner does one United States Congressmen get thrown in jail, than another one gets caught. On Tuesday, there was a special election to fill a vacant seat in the US congress, because that congresseman, Randy Duke Cunningham was convicted of taking bribes. Now our federal law enforcement officers say they have a video tape of a United States Congressman from Louianna taking a 100,000 dollar bribe.
I am not shocked when I hear of corrupt Brazilian politicians. We certainly have corrupt politicians in the United States of America. Can anyone tell me of a Country that has never had any corrupt politicians?
Corrupt politicians!
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
Every country has corrupt politicians. But in America, you like to throw them in prison!
re: An American
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
the above post says it all. In the U.S. we don't have a policy of impunity!!

They do in brazil!! There are no consequences of people stealing HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS!!

When these brazilian politicians see american politicians being thrown in jail, and losing their positions over something like a measley 100K, they must roll on the floor laughing!
Re: Do you know what condescending is?
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
Quote

"Hey MORON: answer the questions and do not come with your condescending remarks. Do you know what condescending is? I will bet you will run to the dictionary.
You must be a LULA voter or an idiot that believes the brazilian government propaganda."

Is that the best argument you can produce?

Behold, now you foreigners visiting this site know why Brazil is having so much problems with an undereducated population besides corrupted politicians. Here is the ultimate example of a mediocre person and deficient Brazilian compatriot, the type that pervades our society!
Biodiesel
written by Guest, June 08, 2006
Of course, Brazil will never be able to produce ALL the biodiesel that the world needs but definitely Brazil is a good candidate to become the world greatest producer.

Although Lula and PT is a gang of idiots, Brazil does have many capable managers and good private entrepreneurship. The Brazilian government is our greatest obstacle but I still believe that we can make it in spite of our politicians.

Even the Americans and other foreigners have more confidence in Brazil than we do.
Correction
written by Guest, June 09, 2006
The article (which was unfortunately removed from this site) said that Brazil would be the biggest energy exporter in the world (and talked about OPEC as well), not the that Brazil would be the worlds biggest producer of biofuels.

I agree with you that Brazil has the potential to be one of the biggest producers of biofuels. It's already the biggest exporter of biofuels. Right now Brazil leads the world in production and export of ethanol for fuel.

The rest of the world is just starting on this process.
What is the difference?
written by Guest, June 09, 2006
I'm confused by the previous post.
...
written by Guest, June 09, 2006
many of the previous statements are in response to an article that was posted here on this site, that quoted Lula as saying that brazil would soon be a member of OPEC, and, if I'm not mistaken, but the year 2012 be the largest energy exporter in the world. (roll eyes)

He must've been dipping in the ethanol when he made that one!
...
written by Guest, June 09, 2006
some of these articles posted do have a tendency to "disappear" after a matter of hours on the site.

There was also an article a couple of days ago that stated the results for a study made by a federal organization that oversees accounting for brazil, if I'm not mistaken, that stated 77% of ALL municipalities in brazil participate in some form or another of corruption....where do these article go?
missing articles
written by Guest, June 09, 2006
"where do these article go?"

Try looking for them on www.brazzilmag.com.

That's where the news articles are posted.
Lula o Apedeuta ataca novamente
written by Guest, June 09, 2006
Começou a Copa da Alemanha: o golaço de Ronaldo
Por Reinaldo Azevedo
No dia da estréia da Copa do Mundo de 2006, Ronaldo Nazário, o dito “Fenômeno”, marca o gol mais importante do evento. Eu já o admirava antes de ele desmoralizar Lula (alguém no país precisa fazê-lo, já que a oposição não o faz). Não só por sua habilidade com a bola, mas também por seu caráter: fala pouco — o que é sempre prudente quando se é jogador de futebol, cineasta, cantor de MPB e, eventualmente, professor da USP —, tem um temperamento lhano e cordato e expressa-se com correção. Para citar Musil (vocês ainda não leram?), exibe certa “aristocracia espiritual” e não é do tipo que se subordina a “donos de cavalos, campos e tradições”. Tem o charme da independência.

A imprensa vive atrás de seus casamentos e namoradas. O vulgo precisa se divertir e sonhar. Já foi mais pobre do que Lula e chegou ao topo do mundo. Não lhe escapa da boca um só perdigoto de demagogia, daquela com que Lula costuma encharcar a política, encantando a “elite branca” de Cláudio Lembo com baba autocomplacente e juros estratosféricos.

A resposta de Ronaldo a Lula é um poema de João Cabral de Melo Neto, ali, a palo seco. Nada falta e nada excede. Ao lembrar que não estava presente à teleconferência em que o Apedeuta indagou Parreira sobre o seu peso, evidencia a covardia intelectual e política do cara. A pergunta, se bem notaram, foi feita de chefe para chefe. A suposta ou real “gordura” em Ronaldo é um problema profissional e remete diretamente à sua imagem, à sua carreira, a seu desempenho. Não pode servir de trampolim político para desocupados.

Em passado recente, o Apedeuta usou o mesmo Ronaldo, só que como bode exultório: comparou a sua trajetória à do jogador, que enfrentou o diabo, foi dado como acabado, mas sobreviveu e brilhou na Copa de 2002. O “Fenômeno” estava por cima. E Lula o usou como escada. Agora, Ronaldo é alvo da especulação sobre suas condições físicas. Lula, o oportunista, pisa-lhe no pescoço. Atenção: assim ele fez carreira; assim se comportou a vida inteira; é um traço do seu caráter. Nunca precisou se esforçar. À diferença de Ronaldo, sempre dependeu da boa vontade de estranhos e sempre lhes deu as costas em seguida. Até abocanhar o poder.

Ronaldo foi ainda mais preciso: depois de lembrar que não estava presente à teleconferência, o que evidencia a covardia circunstancial, informou que os jogadores foram proibidos de fazer perguntas a Lula, o que denota a covardia planejada. O presidente da República pode meter o nariz no futebol, o que não lhe cabe, mas os jogadores, brasileiros que são, não têm o direito de indagar o presidente, o que lhes cabe. A CBF, uma corporação com sotaque fascistóide, proíbe. É bom lembrar que, nas poucas entrevistas coletivas concedidas por Lula, os jornalistas não podiam fazer réplicas. Em um dos casos, era proibido até gravar as respostas. Ninguém reclamou.

Ronaldo é mais corajoso do que a maioria dos oposicionistas e do que a maioria da imprensa. À diferença dos dois grupos, pode dar uma banana pra Lula, que isso lhe é irrelevante. Não precisa ter medo de chefe, de anunciante estatal ou de Daniel Dantas.

E cravou o punhal: seria tão verdadeiro o seu excesso de peso como a fama que o presidente tem de ser chegado a uma cachaça. Lula já tentou expulsar do país um jornalista americano que relatou a sua intimidade com a “marvada”. É um assunto de que ele não gosta. Prefere Black Label. Segundo César Benjamin, ex-dirigente petista, desde 1989 ao menos, o Apedeuta sorve bem as talagadas, antes fornecidas por Dona Zelite. Agora, suponho, ele pode dispensar a generosidade da comunhão de classes para financiar esse hábito social.

Ronaldo dá alguns dribles lógicos. Numa leitura convencional, pode-se dizer que infere que nem Lula é chegado a uma cana nem ele está gordo. As duas coisas seriam falsas. Ou verdadeiras. Há certo consenso de que o jogador está um pouco acima do peso — o que, entendo, não compromete o seu futebol. Se a outra ilação dependente desta for igualmente consensual, é claro que um dos jogadores está com problema, e não é Ronaldo: uma coisa é a pátria de chuteiras estar um tanto gordota; outra, diferente, é a pátria com a faixa presidencial estar de queixo mole.


Hey John
written by Guest, June 15, 2006
Is world cup time man, you not gonna get your easy records of over 100 comments..bad and good ones..
te truth
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
in my country i have alcohol,womens,carnaval,footbal,beaches,sun,food,(i work for this) i have a girl 19 years old,1.65 54kg shes wonderful,if i am, american one woman like tath will cost too much i have to work so much to give her all shee need.by the way in brazil with 400 or 500 dolars per month i can haver a beatufil see BEAUTIL women a house and i have 3 months per years to enjoy the life ,i have vacations,i have a lot of free days on year i make so much sex i i have guarana , açai e others estimulantes why i concern aboput enrgi i think the americans need so much energy to do this things..and for the moron ,brazil have larges reserver of nuclear combustible and then we will be exporter of electricity generated by niobio reactors]
...
written by Guest, June 30, 2006
Prefiro um dirigente que bebe umas talagadas a um que espalha desgraças a torto e a direito.
Miami
written by hoyos, June 18, 2007
Well I quess people don't have anything better to do, but speak rubish. Travel and enjoy life, do whats right. I am from Miami, Florida and will be traveling to Brazil.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack
Xbox Mod Chip | Personal Injury Attorney Los Angeles | Debt Consolidation | Free Credit Report | Bankruptcy