Amazon Rivers Running Dry As Droughts Worsen, They Pave Roads and Deforestation Goes On

Behind a narrow border of trees, a crop duster sprays clouds of agrochemicals onto the vast soy fields stretching out on both sides of the BR-319 highway that cuts deep into Brazil’s Amazon rainforest.

As the road’s asphalt wears thin further north, timber trucks zig-zag to avoid the many potholes along the key transport artery, which spans 885 km (550 miles) and has come to symbolize the tension between infrastructure projects and environmental protection in the world’s largest rainforest.

Linking Manaus, the capital of Amazonas state, and Porto Velho, Rondônia’s state capital, the road has lost most of its paving since it was built in the 1970s – meaning many sections are reduced to a muddy quagmire during the six-month wet season.

Now, as a series of droughts linked to climate change complicate river transport in the region, President Luís Inácio Lula da Silva’s government has vowed to repave the BR-319.

Amazon researchers fear repairing the road could trigger a surge in deforestation in Amazonas state, home to most of Brazil’s best-preserved rainforest, potentially threatening Lula’s progress on stemming forest loss to fight climate change.

But calls for rebuilding the road are growing louder.

Reading the ruins of Amazon fires, scientists see crisis ahead
During a record drought last year, farmers and residents had to rely on the BR-319 as the normally busy Amazon waterways sank to their lowest levels, making it almost impossible for shipping to navigate them.

Back in 2013, maintenance work resumed on the dirt portion of the road that runs through the district of Realidade, in Humaitá municipality, dramatically reducing the time it takes to reach the main city, and beyond. Paving work has not yet begun.

Humaitá mayor Dedei Lobo is happy – he expects an even harsher drought from May this year, so the road will be needed, especially as rivers are still below average levels.

Asked about environmental concerns over the road repairs, Lobo dismissed them as “a fad launched by NGOs financed by First World countries that have trains, subways, trams etc” while treating Amazon residents as “living in an altar”.

Environmental reserves already established around the BR-319 should halt deforestation, as long as the federal government reactivates abandoned enforcement checkpoints, he added.

But the Transdisciplinary Network of the Amazon (RETA), a collection of grassroots environmental groups from the area around the road, has said the work carried out on the BR-319 near Realidade is already driving up land prices.

This is fueling land-grabbing and deforestation, said Dionéia Ferreira, a RETA coordinator.

Environmentalists also fear that highway development leads loggers, farmers and land-grabbers to extend unauthorized side roads deeper into the forest in a pattern known as “fish bones” because of how the side roads look from space.

According to a 2023 analysis from the BR-319 Observatory, 5,092 km (3,100 miles) of illegal side roads have been built along the highway.

Vicious circle?

When he returned to power in 2023, Lula vowed to protect the Amazon but he also accepted a key demand of Brazil’s powerful farming lobby and many locals by promising to pave the BR-319 – at an estimated cost of some 2 billion reais ($385 million).

In December, the lower house of Congress approved a bill to relax environmental rules so that the BR-319 could be paved.

The draft law, which still needs Senate approval, authorizes the use of conservation funds donated to Brazil to finance the project, such as the $1.3 billion Amazon Fund backed by the U.S. and European allies.

The government plans to pave the road’s 406-km (250-mile) middle section by 2027, and in late April it launched a bidding process to pave a 20-km (12-mile) northern segment of the road, which has already obtained environmental licences.

Some analysts fear expanding roads in the fragile Amazon region could exacerbate the very problems that created the need for more land-based transport connections in the first place.

“Paving the road … also has effects on deforestation, which may elevate the risk of droughts,” said Carlos Souza Jr. from the Imazon environmental institute.

Road density in the Amazon increased 51% between 2012 and 2020, with roads now disturbing 55% of the forest’s area, according to a study from the Amazon Georeferenced Socio-Environmental Information Network (RAISG), a transnational consortium of Amazon environmental organizations.

In places like Realidade, not everyone thinks more deforestation would necessarily be a bad thing.

Sitting at a bus station beside the BR-319 in the district’s main village, coffee grower Norberto Lauret said deforestation “brings the daily bread in, and avoids people having to go live in big cities”, though he said forest clearance must be done in accordance with the law.

The process is well underway. Between 2012 and 2022, there was a 20-fold jump in annual deforestation in Humaitá, according to Brazil’s Institute for Space Research, consolidating the status of southern Amazonas state as a new frontier for agribusiness and forest loss.

Drawing farmers, Realidade attained district status in 2019 and now boasts small restaurants, farm shops, markets and evangelical churches.

Side roads and Satellite dishes

Advocates for repaving the BR-319 deny that the road has prompted deforestation.

“The road has been open for 50 years… and there has been no deforestation” in its unpaved central portion, congressman Coronel Chrisóstomo said at his office in Porto Velho, flanked by life-size cardboard cut-outs of himself and former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.

Many of those most harmed by deforestation also see benefits in the paving of the BR-319, as side roads make remote areas more accessible.

They include the Linha 17, a side road that pushed out from Realidade in 2016, extending through traditional forest communities and, according to Ferreira from RETA, bringing loggers, land-grabbers and cattle ranchers into the interior.

As nut and açaí fruit groves were destroyed and erosion from deforestation muddied fishing grounds, the riverside Pirapitinga community saw its traditional sources of income decline, driving some to mine illegally for gold in the river.

Although uncontrolled deforestation is frowned upon, many in the community approve of Linha 17, which was used by the government to electrify the area last year.

“You can now get to Realidade with a motorcycle and shop in no time,” said forest collector and peasant farmer Cimião Alves, as he pointed to his satellite dish and an electric pump pulling water from the nearby river.

Despite the vote in Congress to allocate funds for the road paving project, questions remain over whether it will get the go-ahead from the Environment Ministry.

Last year, Environment Minister Marina Silva told Congress the road’s environmental and economic rationale has not yet been proven.

After selling properties elsewhere in the Amazon, farmer José Antônio de Freitas resettled in Realidade in 2010, attracted by larger plots in the new frontier.

He is confident that Lula will be able to push through the project, citing his past record on contentious Amazon infrastructure projects.

“Opponents do not think about growth and development,” he said. “If I pay taxes for a truck … then you have to give me the (road) conditions to drive it.”

Andre Cabette Fabio is Climate and Nature Correspondent for the Thomson Reuters Foundation based in Rio de Janeiro.

This article was produced by the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Visit them at https://www.context.news/

Tags:

You May Also Like

After Having Been World’s 8th Largest Economy Brazil Is Celebrating a 14th Place

Brazil gained one position in the ranking of world economies. In the opinion of ...

US$ 1.2 Billion for Brazil’s Environment

The World Bank will lend Brazil US$ 1.2 billion over the course of four ...

While Others Might Struggle Brazil Is Ready to Thrive in a Greener Planet

The world leaders have confirmed the prisoner’s dilemma; unfortunately the entire world will face ...

It seems the future never arrives in Brazil What Lies Ahead in Brazil? Brazil Has No Exemplary Past or Present. But What Lies Ahead for the Country? Europeans, US, developed country, developing country. Bolsonaro, future B. Michael Rubin For years, experts have debated what separates a developing country from a developed one. The GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of a country is one simple way to measure its economic development. Another way to measure a country's progress is the extent of public education, e.g. how many citizens complete high school. A country's health may be measured by the effectiveness of its healthcare system, for example, life expectancy and infant mortality. With these measurement tools, it's easier to gauge the difference between a country like Brazil and one like the U.S. What's not easy to gauge is how these two countries developed so differently when they were both "discovered" at the same time. In 1492 and 1500 respectively, the U.S. and Brazil fell under the spell of white Europeans for the first time. While the British and Portuguese had the same modus operandi, namely, to exploit their discoveries for whatever they had to offer, not to mention extinguishing the native Americans already living there if they got in the way, the end result turned out significantly different in the U.S. than in Brazil. There are several theories on how/why the U.S. developed at a faster pace than Brazil. The theories originate via contrasting perspectives – from psychology to economics to geography. One of the most popular theories suggests the divergence between the two countries is linked to politics, i.e. the U.S. established a democratic government in 1776, while Brazil's democracy it could be said began only in earnest in the 1980s. This theory states that the Portuguese monarchy, as well as the 19th and 20th century oligarchies that followed it, had no motivation to invest in industrial development or education of the masses. Rather, Brazil was prized for its cheap and plentiful labor to mine the rich soil of its vast land. There is another theory based on collective psychology that says the first U.S. colonizers from England were workaholic Puritans, who avoided dancing and music in place of work and religious devotion. They labored six days a week then spent all of Sunday in church. Meanwhile, the white settlers in Brazil were unambitious criminals who had been freed from prison in Portugal in exchange for settling in Brazil. The Marxist interpretation of why Brazil lags behind the U.S. was best summarized by Eduardo Galeano, the Uruguayan writer, in 1970. Galeano said five hundred years ago the U.S. had the good fortune of bad fortune. What he meant was the natural riches of Brazil – gold, silver, and diamonds – made it ripe for exploitation by western Europe. Whereas in the U.S., lacking such riches, the thirteen colonies were economically insignificant to the British. Instead, U.S. industrialization had official encouragement from England, resulting in early diversification of its exports and rapid development of manufacturing. II Leaving this debate to the historians, let us turn our focus to the future. According to global projections by several economic strategists, what lies ahead for Brazil, the U.S., and the rest of the world is startling. Projections forecast that based on GDP growth, in 2050 the world's largest economy will be China, not the U.S. In third place will be India, and in fourth – Brazil. With the ascendency of three-fourths of the BRIC countries over the next decades, it will be important to reevaluate the terms developed and developing. In thirty years, it may no longer be necessary to accept the label characterized by Nelson Rodrigues's famous phrase "complexo de vira-lata," for Brazil's national inferiority complex. For Brazilians, this future scenario presents glistening hope. A country with stronger economic power would mean the government has greater wealth to expend on infrastructure, crime control, education, healthcare, etc. What many Brazilians are not cognizant of are the pitfalls of economic prosperity. While Brazilians today may be envious of their wealthier northern neighbors, there are some aspects of a developed country's profile that are not worth envying. For example, the U.S. today far exceeds Brazil in the number of suicides, prescription drug overdoses, and mass shootings. GDP growth and economic projections depend on multiple variables, chief among them the global economic situation and worldwide political stability. A war in the Middle East, for example, can affect oil production and have global ramifications. Political stability within a country is also essential to its economic health. Elected presidents play a crucial role in a country's progress, especially as presidents may differ radically in their worldview. The political paths of the U.S. and Brazil are parallel today. In both countries, we've seen a left-wing regime (Obama/PT) followed by a far-right populist one (Trump/Bolsonaro), surprising many outside observers, and in the U.S. contradicting every political pollster, all of whom predicted a Trump loss to Hillary Clinton in 2016. In Brazil, although Bolsonaro was elected by a clear majority, his triumph has created a powerful emotional polarization in the country similar to what is happening in the U.S. Families, friends, and colleagues have split in a love/hate relationship toward the current presidents in the U.S. and Brazil, leaving broken friendships and family ties. Both presidents face enormous challenges to keep their campaign promises. In Brazil, a sluggish economy just recovering from a recession shows no signs of robust GDP growth for at least the next two years. High unemployment continues to devastate the consumer confidence index in Brazil, and Bolsonaro is suffering under his campaign boasts that his Economy Minister, Paulo Guedes, has all the answers to fix Brazil's slump. Additionally, there is no end to the destruction caused by corruption in Brazil. Some experts believe corruption to be the main reason why Brazil has one of the world's largest wealth inequality gaps. Political corruption robs government coffers of desperately needed funds for education and infrastructure, in addition to creating an atmosphere that encourages everyday citizens to underreport income and engage in the shadow economy, thereby sidestepping tax collectors and regulators. "Why should I be honest about reporting my income when nobody else is? The politicians are only going to steal the tax money anyway," one Brazilian doctor told me. While Bolsonaro has promised a housecleaning of corrupt officials, this is a cry Brazilians have heard from every previous administration. In only the first half-year of his presidency, he has made several missteps, such as nominating one of his sons to be the new ambassador to the U.S., despite the congressman's lack of diplomatic credentials. A June poll found that 51 percent of Brazilians now lack confidence in Bolsonaro's leadership. Just this week, Brazil issued regulations that open a fast-track to deport foreigners who are dangerous or have violated the constitution. The rules published on July 26 by Justice Minister Sérgio Moro define a dangerous person as anyone associated with terrorism or organized crime, in addition to football fans with a violent history. Journalists noted that this new regulation had coincidental timing for an American journalist who has come under fire from Moro for publishing private communications of Moro's. Nevertheless, despite overselling his leadership skills, Bolsonaro has made some economic progress. With the help of congressional leader Rodrigo Maia, a bill is moving forward in congress for the restructuring of Brazil's generous pension system. Most Brazilians recognize the long-term value of such a change, which can save the government billions of dollars over the next decade. At merely the possibility of pension reform, outside investors have responded positively, and the São Paulo stock exchange has performed brilliantly, reaching an all-time high earlier this month. In efforts to boost the economy, Bolsonaro and Paulo Guedes have taken the short-term approach advocated by the Chicago school of economics championed by Milton Friedman, who claimed the key to boosting a slugging economy was to cut government spending. Unfortunately many economists, such as Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman, disagree with this approach. They believe the most effective way to revive a slow economy is exactly the opposite, to spend more money not less. They say the government should be investing money in education and infrastructure projects, which can help put people back to work. Bolsonaro/Guedes have also talked about reducing business bureaucracy and revising the absurdly complex Brazilian tax system, which inhibits foreign and domestic business investment. It remains to be seen whether Bolsonaro has the political acumen to tackle this Godzilla-sized issue. Should Bolsonaro find a way to reform the tax system, the pension system, and curb the most egregious villains of political bribery and kickbacks – a tall order – his efforts could indeed show strong economic results in time for the next election in 2022. Meanwhile, some prominent leaders have already lost faith in Bolsonaro's efforts. The veteran of political/economic affairs, Joaquim Levy, has parted company with the president after being appointed head of the government's powerful development bank, BNDES. Levy and Bolsonaro butted heads over an appointment Levy made of a former employee of Lula's. When neither man refused to back down, Levy resigned his position at BNDES. Many observers believe Bolsonaro's biggest misstep has been his short-term approach to fixing the economy by loosening the laws protecting the Amazon rainforest. He and Guedes believe that by opening up more of the Amazon to logging, mining, and farming, we will see immediate economic stimulation. On July 28, the lead article of The New York Times detailed the vastly increased deforestation in the Amazon taking place under Bolsonaro's leadership. Environmental experts argue that the economic benefits of increased logging and mining in the Amazon are microscopic compared to the long-term damage to the environment. After pressure from European leaders at the recent G-20 meeting to do more to protect the world's largest rainforest, Bolsonaro echoed a patriotic response demanding that no one has the right to an opinion about the Amazon except Brazilians. In retaliation to worldwide criticism, Bolsonaro threatened to follow Trump's example and pull out of the Paris climate accord; however, Bolsonaro was persuaded by cooler heads to retract his threat. To prove who was in control of Brazil's Amazon region, he appointed a federal police officer with strong ties to agribusiness as head of FUNAI, the country's indigenous agency. In a further insult to the world's environmental leaders, not to mention common sense, Paulo Guedes held a news conference on July 25 in Manaus, the largest city in the rainforest, where he declared that since the Amazon forest is known for being the "lungs" of the world, Brazil should charge other countries for all the oxygen the forest produces. Bolsonaro/Guedes also have promised to finish paving BR-319, a controversial highway that cuts through the Amazon forest, linking Manaus to the state of Rondônia and the rest of the country. Inaugurated in 1976, BR-319 was abandoned by federal governments in the 1980s and again in the 1990s as far too costly and risky. Environmentalists believe the highway's completion will seal a death knoll on many indigenous populations by vastly facilitating the growth of the logging and mining industries. Several dozen heavily armed miners dressed in military fatigues invaded a Wajãpi village recently in the state of Amapá near the border of French Guiana and fatally stabbed one of the community's leaders. While Brazil's environmental protection policies are desperately lacking these days, not all the news here was bad. On the opening day of the 2019 Pan America Games in Lima, Peru, Brazilian Luisa Baptista, swam, biked, and ran her way to the gold medal in the women's triathlon. The silver medal went to Vittoria Lopes, another Brazilian. B. Michael Rubin is an American writer living in Brazil.

Brazil Has No Exemplary Past or Present. But What Lies Ahead for the Country?

For years, experts have debated what separates a developing country from a developed one. ...

Led by Industry Economy Grows 5.4% in Brazil

The Brazilian economy grew by 5.4% in the second quarter compared with the same ...

Getting ready to work

Moody’s Lowers Brazil’s Credit Rating, But Doesn’t Anticipate a Double-Dip Recession

Brazil’s economy is clearly growing again after a severe recession and will be shielded ...

Cattle raising in the Amazon is responsible for 65% of the forest destruction

Eating Less Beef Seems to Be the Only Way to End Amazonian Deforestation

Beef production has become a major driver of tropical deforestation, responsible for as much ...

Lula talks to the crowd at Avenida Paulista - Ricardo Stuckert/Instituto Lula

Despite Street Protests Brazil President Goes Ahead with Pension Reform

  Brazil’s president Michel Temer and senior lawmakers are still unwavering in their support ...

Floating Exchange Rate Is Here to Stay, Says Brazilian President

Nelson Barbosa, the executive secretary of Brazil’s Ministry of Finances, speaking at a seminar ...

A worker seen in a coffee farm during operation to identify slave workers in Minas Gerais state. REUTERS/Adriano Machado

Slave Workers Rescued in Brazil Were as Young as Nine

A large Brazilian tobacco exporter has been charged with using slave labor in the ...

WordPress database error: [Table './brazzil3_live/wp_wfHits' is marked as crashed and last (automatic?) repair failed]
SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM `wp_wfHits`