Brazil’s New Anti-Corruption Law Scares Politicians and Jurists

    TSE, Federal Election Board in Brazil

    TSE, Federal Election Board in Brazil Brazil’s Clean Criminal Record (Ficha Limpa) aims to moralize Brazilian politics, establishing some ethical standards. The idea is simple: candidates with criminal records will be ineligible to run for office.

    But what exactly is a criminal record? After much debate, the Brazilian Congress decided, because there are a lot of rogue judges out there, that it would have to be a case that has been decided by more than one judge; in other words, by a group of judges.

    However, in a series of rulings, the Supreme Court has consistently said that a politician can only be barred from running for office because of criminal charges after the case has exhausted all appeals and reached a final decision. That is a hard call in Brazil where the appeal process seems to be endless and can drag for years on end.

    It turns out that politicians are not the only people worried about the new law. Now, judges are complaining that Ficha Limpa cases could overwhelm them. Today, Monday, July 5, at 7:00 pm, is the final deadline for registering candidates.

    Presidential candidates are registered at the TSE (Federal Election Board), but all other candidates are registered at regional electoral courts (TREs). If a registration is challenged, the case should go the TSE. But the TSE examines such cases only on two days each week, Tuesday and Thursday, at evening sessions.

    Two judges on the TSE (Marcelo Ribeiro and Ricardo Lewandowski) have optimistically said that any controversial points not resolved by regional courts should go to the TSE to be resolved on a case-by-case basis.

    That does seem optimistic in light of the fact that the site www.congressoemfoco.uol.br says that around 250 members of the Congress have legal problems that could make them ineligible under Ficha Limpa. And in the state of Rio de Janeiro, 37 out of 70 deputies in the legislative assembly have the same problem.

    Luis Salata, president of the Electoral Studies Commission of the São Paulo Bar Association (OAB-SP) says he believes there will be a backlog in the registration phase making it difficult for the courts to meet deadlines.

    One possible solution would be for the calendar to remain in effect, candidates whose registration is challenged would be allowed to continue campaigning and then have the case decided after the election – that happens now, and often the decision is long (years) after the election.

    Justice (Supreme Court) Marco Aurélio says cases should go as quickly as possible to the Supreme Court. He says that will head off congestion and possible injustice. “The Supreme Court will decide what prevails in this case: the Constitution or the Law.”

    This is a reference to the fact that the constitution says one thing and the Ficha Limpa law says something else: the constitution says that any changes in electoral law must be made a year before elections (“annuality principle”), and that a retroactive law can never be detrimental to defendants (“the law cannot be retroactive to harm”).

    In both cases the Ficha Limpa law does the opposite: having been signed into law only on June 4, it will be operational for this year’s October elections. And it is retroactive, barring politicians with convictions before June 4.

    “Dirty” Candidates

    The ruling by the Federal Election Board that the Ficha Limpa law is in fact retroactive and does make politicians with convictions in the past ineligible is going to have consequences at the political party level. Parties will be forced to review their own ethical standards and be more rigorous selecting candidates.

    Deputy Antonio Carlos Junior (DEM, Bahia state) says that parties will be more careful about who they select to run for office, although it will not be an easy task. Parties will have to reeducate members and draw up ethical codes, he said.

    Senator Álvaro Dias (PSDB, Paraná), the vice leader of the party, said the changes were going to be a “natural consequence” of the new law. “Parties will have to be more rigid or their candidates will be rejected by the TREs. Candidates that were possible have suddenly become ineligible,” he pointed out.

    Senator Pedro Simon (PMDB, Rio Grande do Sul) said he saw the law as a step toward ending impunity in Brazil and proof that the idea that “nothing ever changes in Brazil,” is wrong. Simon pointed out that the law was the result of popular pressure (it arrived at the Congress in the form of a petition with over 1.6 million signatures).

    However, deputy Cândido Vacarezza (PT, São Paulo), leader of the government in the Chamber of Deputies, said he saw serious problems with the legislation.

    “I question the legal basis of Ficha Limpa. There is the principle which requires a law changing the rules of an election to be put in place at least a year before the election. Then there is the retroactive aspect that is detrimental to defendants, something that runs counter to a fundamental part of our jurisprudence.”

    ABr

    Tags:

    • Show Comments (0)

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    comment *

    • name *

    • email *

    • website *

    Ads

    You May Also Like

    Candomblé

    Intolerance in Brazil: The Hard Life of Those Who Believe in African Gods

    In the beginning of May, the Report on the Human Right to Education investigative ...

    Boeing 777-300ER

    Brazil’s TAM Gets First of Eight Boeings 777

    Brazilian leading airline TAM has just received from the manufacturing plant in Seattle, USA, ...

    Boeing imported by TAM

    The Lowdown on Brazil: Country Gets First Trade Deficit Since 2001

    January brought Brazil its first monthly trade deficit in almost eight years as exports ...

    Finance Minister Warns: Brazil Will Stay the Course

    "I am certain that economic policy will not change in direction, because it is ...

    Tear Down the Wall!

    Perhaps the most powerful argument for eliminating visa requirements is that they’re simply a ...

    Brazil, the Original Leader of the Americas – Part I

    In November 1807, when Napoleon’s army invaded Portugal, the day before the French forces ...

    Kirchner, Morales, Lula, Chávez at Venezuela's Margarita summit

    Brazil-Venezuela Ethanol Dispute to Dominate South American Energy Summit

    Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is at odds with Brazilian counterpart Luiz Inácio Lula da ...

    Iron ore Brazil

    Ability to Export Raw Material Helps Brazil’s Faster Recovery, Says IMF

    Brazil and other emerging economies should recover more rapidly than developing nations from the ...

    English for Brazucas

    Of the kitchen appliances, one is—or used to be—more popular in Brazil than in ...

    Damascus/Sí£o Paulo (Brazil) Direct, Courtesy of Syria

    Syria is planning to offer a flight between the city of São Paulo, in ...